Thiên lệch hành vi và ra quyết định trong giáo dục: Góc nhìn từ kinh tế học hành vi

Các tác giả

  • Nguyễn Lê Hà Trường Đại học Quy Nhơn

Tóm tắt

This paper applies a behavioral economics perspective to analyze behavioral biases that influence decision-making processes in education and proposes intervention strategies to enhance the quality of educational decisions. The study employs a systematic literature review combined with theoretical analysis, drawing upon seminal works in behavioral economics and educational research. The findings indicate that the decisions of learners, teachers, parents, and educational administrators are affected by various cognitive biases, including present bias, status quo bias, confirmation bias, framing effect, anchoring effect, herding behavior, and overconfidence bias. These biases shape decisions related to educational and career choices, learning strategies, instructional innovation, and educational management practices. Based on these findings, the study proposes a behavioral framework for education consisting of four interconnected components: behavioral biases - educational decisions - consequences - behavioral interventions (nudges). The paper also suggests the application of behavioral nudges as a means of supporting educational stakeholders in making more effective decisions in the context of educational reform and digital transformation.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Damgaard, M. T., & Nielsen, H. S. (2018). Nudging in education. Economics of Education Review, 64, 313-342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.03.008

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast and Slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

Lavecchia, A. M., Liu, H., & Oreopoulos, P. (2020). Behavioral economics and nudging in education: Evidence from the field. In B. Bradley & C. Green (Eds.), The Economics of Education (2nd ed., pp. 21-35). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815391-8.00002-1

Mayer, S. E., Kalil, A., Oreopoulos, P., & Gallegos, S. (2018). How behavioral science can empower parents to improve children’s educational outcomes. Behavioral Science & Policy, 4(2), 52-67. https://doi.org/10.1353/bsp.2018.0018

Samek, A. S., & List, J. A. (2018). Field experiments in education: The role of behavioral economics. In A. V. Banerjee & E. Duflo (Eds.), Handbook of Field Experiments (Vol. 2, pp. 463-493). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.hefe.2018.08.003

Thaler, R. H. (2016). Behavioral economics: Past, present, and future. American Economic Review, 106(7), 1577-1600. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.106.7.1577

Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press.

Weijers, R. J., de Koning, B. B., & Paas, F. (2021). Nudging in education: From theory towards guidelines for successful implementation. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(4), 883-902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00495-0

Đã Xuất bản

20.06.2026

Cách trích dẫn

Nguyễn Lê Hà. (2026). Thiên lệch hành vi và ra quyết định trong giáo dục: Góc nhìn từ kinh tế học hành vi. Tạp Chí Giáo dục, 26(đặc biệt 6), 243–249. Truy vấn từ https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/5019

Số

Chuyên mục

Các bài báo