Đánh giá xác thực trong giáo dục: Một nghiên cứu tổng quan
- Từ khóa:
- Overview
- authentic assessment
- education
Tóm tắt
Authentic assessment is one of the assessment methods that helps improve the effectiveness of competence-based assessment, meeting the requirements of assessment innovation. This study uses a literature review method through content analysis combined with thematic synthesis, comparing and contrasting studies on the origins, methods, and tools of authentic assessment, and its application in teaching practice. The literature review results show a lack of research on the application of authentic assessment in teaching subjects at secondary schools in Vietnam. The research results emphasize the urgent need to research and apply authentic assessment in competence-based teaching to improve student learning outcomes in the context of educational reform.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Airasian, P., & Russell, M. (2007). Classroom assessment: Concepts and applications. McGraw Hill.
Archbald, D. A., & Newmann, F. M. (1988). Beyond standardized testing: Assessing authentic academic achievement in the secondary school. National Association of Secondary School Principals.
Arnold, L., & Croxford, J. (2025). Is it time to stop talking about authentic assessment?. Teaching in Higher Education, 30(3), 735-743.
Asante, G. (2023). Knowledge and practices of authentic assessment in junior high schools. Open Access Library Journal, 10(5), 1-14.
Azim, S., & Khan, M. (2012). Authentic assessment: An instructional tool to enhance students learning. Academic Research International, 2(3), 314.
Baartman, L. K., Prins, F. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Van Der Vleuten, C. P. (2007). Determining the quality of competence assessment programs: A self-evaluation procedure. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 33(3-4), 258-281.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21, 5-31.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
Cumming, J., & Maxwell, G. S. (1999). Contextualising authentic assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 6(2), 177-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695949992865
Charles, M., & Boyle, B. (2014). In M. Lagrange (Ed.), Formative assessment for teaching and learning. SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific.
Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5-6), 523-545.
Darling-Hammond, L., Adamson, F., & Abedi, J. (2010). Beyond basic skills: The role of performance assessment in achieving 21st century standards of learning (p. 52). Stanford Center for Opportunity Pollcy in Education.
Đoàn Quang Trung (2019). Đánh giá thực trong đánh giá năng lực tiếng Anh giao tiếp của sinh viên đại học ngành Ngôn ngữ Anh. Luận án tiến sĩ Khoa học giáo dục, Viện Khoa học Giáo dục Việt Nam.
Fook, C. Y., & Sidhu, G. K. (2010). Authentic assessment and pedagogical strategies in higher education. Journal of Social Sciences, 6(2), 153-161.
Gulikers, J. T., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67-86.
Hernán, B., López-Pastor, E. J., Lorente-Catalán, V. M., & Kirk, E. D. (2023). Challenges with using formative and authentic assessment in physical education teaching from experienced teachers’ perspectives. Curriculum Studies in Health and Physical Education, 14(2), 109-126.
Inayah, N., Komariah, E., & Nasir, A. (2019). The practice of authentic assessment in an EFL speaking classroom. Studies in English Language and Education, 6(1), 152-162. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v6i1.13069
Kerka, S. (1995). Techniques for authentic assessment. ERIC Clearinghouse. http://ericacve.org/docs/auth-pab.htm
Kiều Thu Linh (2022). Đánh giá xác thực và áp dụng trong môn Toán cấp Trung học cơ sở. Tạp chí Khoa học Giáo dục Việt Nam, 18(2), 29-33
Koh, K. H. (2011). Improving teachers’ assessment literacy through professional development. Teaching Education, 22(3), 255-276.
Meyer, C. A. (1992). What's the difference between...? Educational Leadership, 49(8), 39-40.
Moon, T. R., Brighton, C. M., Callahan, C. M., & Robinson, A. (2005). Development of authentic assessments for the middle school classroom. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(2-3), 119-133.
Morris, R. V. (2001). Drama and authentic assessment in a social studies classroom. The Social Studies, 92(1), 41-44.
Mueller, J. (2005). The authentic assessment toolbox: Enhancing student learning through online faculty development. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 1-7.
Newmann, F., Brandt, R., & Wiggins, G. (1998). Research news and comment: An exchange of views on “Semantics, psychometrics, and assessment reform: A close look at ‘authentic’ assessments”. Educational Researcher, 27(6), 20-22. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X027006020A
Nguyễn Thanh Nhân (2012). Tổ chức dạy học đại học thông qua các nhiệm vụ học tập dưới góc nhìn của quan điểm đánh giá thực. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 289, 58-61.
Nguyễn Thị Thu Hằng (2022). Xây dựng bộ công cụ đánh giá xác thực trong dạy học Vật lí đại cương. Luận án tiến sĩ Khoa học Giáo dục, Trường Đại học Sư phạm - Đại học Thái Nguyên.
Nguyễn Thị Thu Trang (2023). Quy trình thiết kế đánh giá xác thực trong dạy học môn Toán theo hướng phát triển năng lực cho học sinh tiểu học. Tạp chí Khoa học Giáo dục Việt Nam, 19(04), 22-26
Palm, T. (2008). Performance assessment and authentic assessment: A conceptual analysis of the literature. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 13(1), 1-11.
Prestidge, L. K., & Williams, G. C. H. (2000). Authentic assessment: Employing appropriate tools for evaluating students' work in 21st-century classrooms. Intervention in School and Clinic, 35(3), 178-182.
Romberg, T. A. (1995). Reform in school mathematics and authentic assessment. State University of New York Press.
Scott, J. (2000). Authentic assessment tools. In Using authentic assessment in vocational education. ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education.
Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4-14.
Sotiriadou, P., Logan, D., Daly, A., & Guest, R. (2020). The role of authentic assessment to preserve academic integrity and promote skill development and employability. Studies in Higher Education, 45(11), 2132-2148.
Su, F., O'Dea, M., Wood, M., & Seidl, E. (2026). Embracing a new world: Authentic assessment designs in an age of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI). Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 1-12.
Supinah, R. (2021). Development of authentic assessment to improve students’ mathematical problem solving ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1), 012061.
Terwilliger, J. S. (1998). Rejoinder: Response to Wiggins and Newmann. Educational Researcher, 27(6), 22-23.
Tombari, M. L., & Borich, G. D. (1999). Authentic assessment in the classroom: Applications and practice. Prentice Hall/Merrill (ERIC).
Trần Thái Phương Linh (2025). Thiết kế và sử dụng Đánh giá xác thực trong dạy học chủ đề Hình đồng dạng trong môn Toán lớp 8 theo hướng phát triển năng lực giải quyết vấn đề cho học sinh. Tạp chí Khoa học, Trường Đại học Đồng Tháp, 14(Số đặc biệt 03), 108-122.
Webb, D. C. (2009). Designing professional development for assessment. Educational Designer, 1(2), 1-26.
Wiggins, G. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 2(1), 2.
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Bản quyền (c) 2026 Tạp chí Giáo dục
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .
