Phát triển năng lực thiết kế kế hoạch bài dạy theo mô hình 5E tích hợp tam giác Johnstone cho sinh viên Sư phạm Hóa học theo tiếp cận PBTE: Nghiên cứu trường hợp tại Trường Đại học Sư phạm Hà Nội
Tóm tắt
Lesson plan design competence is one of the core professional competencies of teachers, especially in the context of implementing the 2018 General Education Program with a competency-based approach. This study aims to propose a process for developing lesson plan design competence based on the 5E model integrated with the Johnstone triangle using a PBTE approach and to verify the effectiveness of the process on Pre-service Chemistry Teachers at Hanoi National University of Education. Through a theoretical analysis method combined with a semi-experimental approach using pre- and post-design on a group of 49 Chemistry Education students at Hanoi National University of Education, the results show that the proposed process significantly improves students’ lesson plan design competence (p < 0.001), with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 0.954). Improvements were observed in all five phases of the 5E model, with more pronounced increases in the Engage, Explore, and Evaluate phases. Lower scores are achieved in the Explain and Elaborate phases due to the requirement for the ability to switch between levels of chemical representation. The research results provide preliminary empirical evidence for the effectiveness of integrating the Johnstone’s triangle into the 5E model in chemistry teacher training using the PBTE approach.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ali, Z., Ullah, H., Ahmad, S., & Ahmed, S. (2025). Effect of 5E instructional model on students learning outcomes in the subject of chemistry. Social Science Review Archives, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.70670/sra.v3i1.560
American Chemical Society (2025). ACS guidelines and recommendations for teaching middle and high school chemistry. American Chemical Society. https://www.acs.org/education/policies/middle-and-high-school-chemistry.html
Bộ GD-ĐT (2018). Chương trình giáo dục phổ thông môn Hóa học (ban hành kèm theo Thông tư số 32/2018/TT-BGDĐT ngày 26/12/2018 của Bộ trưởng Bộ GD-ĐT).
Bui, L. T. N., & Khuu, V. T. (2020). Inquiry-based learning: An effective approach to teaching science aiming to develop students’ competencies. Vietnam Journal of Education, 4(1), 61-68. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2020.9
Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Van Scotter, P., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins, effectiveness, and applications. BSCS.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Duran, L. B., & Duran, E. (2004). The 5E instructional model: A learning cycle approach for inquiry-based science teaching. The Science Education Review, 3(2), 49-58.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Forzani, F. M. (2014). Understanding “core practices” and “practice-based” teacher education: Learning from the past. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 357-368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114533800
Gabel, D. (1999). Improving teaching and learning through chemistry education research: A look to the future. Journal of Chemical Education, 76(4), 548-554. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed076p548
Gkitzia, V., Salta, K., & Tzougraki, C. (2020). Students’ competence in translating between different types of chemical representations. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 21(1), 307-330. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00301G
Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600902875340
Gwet, K. L. (2014). Handbook of inter-rater reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among raters (4th ed.). Advanced Analytics, LLC.
Jao, L., Wiseman, D., Kobiela, M., Gonsalves, A., & Savard, A. (2018). Practice-based pedagogy in mathematics and science teaching methods: Challenges and adaptations in context. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 18(2), 177-186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-018-0009-0
Johnstone, A. H. (1982). Macro- and micro-chemistry. School Science Review, 64(227), 377-379.
Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7(2), 75-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.1991.tb00230.x
Johnstone, A. H. (2000). Teaching of chemistry - logical or psychological? Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 1(1), 9-15. https://doi.org/10.1039/A9RP90001B
Johnstone, A. H. (2010). You can’t get there from here. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(1), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed800026d
König, J., Bremerich-Vos, A., Buchholtz, C., Fladung, I., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Pre-service teachers’ generic and subject-specific lesson-planning skills: On learning adaptive teaching during initial teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(2), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2019.1679115
König, J., Krepf, M., Bremerich-Vos, A., & Buchholtz, C. (2021). Meeting cognitive demands of lesson planning: Introducing the CODE-PLAN model to describe and analyze teachers’ planning competence. The Teacher Educator, 56(4), 466-487. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2021.1938324
Li, W. S. S., & Arshad, M. Y. (2014). Application of multiple representation levels in redox reactions among tenth grade chemistry teachers. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 11(3), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10117a
Matsumoto-Royo, K., & Ramírez-Montoya, M. S. (2021). Core practices in practice-based teacher education: A systematic literature review of its teaching and assessment process. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, Article 101047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101047
McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., & Kavanagh, S. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378-386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113493807
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Polanin, J. R., Austin, M., Taylor, J. A., Steingut, R. R., Rodgers, M. A., & Williams, R. (2024). Effects of the 5E instructional model: A systematic review and meta-analysis. AERA Open, 10. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584241269866
Phạm Thị Bình, Đỗ Thị Hồng (2021). Vận dụng mô hình 5E và thí nghiệm ảo trong dạy học chủ đề “Tốc độ phản ứng” - Hóa học lớp 10 nhằm phát triển năng lực tìm hiểu tự nhiên dưới góc độ hóa học. Tạp chí Khoa học, Trường Đại học Sư phạm Hà Nội, 66(4E), 95-107.
Pham, T. B., & Nguyen, T. H. (2025). Teaching the topic “Acid-Base-pH-Oxides-Salts” in grade 8 natural science using the 5E model to develop students’ scientific inquiry competence. HNUE Journal of Science: Educational Sciences, 70(1A), 91-104. https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1075.2025-0023
Røneid, K. N., & Børte, K. (2026). Learning to plan lessons: How feedback supports pre-service teachers’ lesson planning. Frontiers in Education, 11, Article 1812418. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1812418
Sotáková, I., & Ganajová, M. (2023). The effect of the 5E instructional model on students’ cognitive processes and their attitudes towards chemistry as a subject. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(9), Article em2317. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13469
Taber, K. S. (2013). Revisiting the chemistry triplet: Drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and the psychology of learning to inform chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(2), 156-168. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3RP00012E
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Talanquer, V. (2011). Macro, submicro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry “triplet”. International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), 179-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903386435
Turan, S. (2021). Pre-service teacher experiences of the 5E instructional model: A systematic review of qualitative studies. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(8), Article em1994. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11102
Treagust, D. F., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. L. (2003). The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1353-1368. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070306
Vũ Phương Liên, Trần Thị Thu Phương (2022). Dạy học phần “Hợp chất chứa nitrogen” - Hóa học 12 theo mô hình 5E nhằm phát triển năng lực tìm hiểu thế giới tự nhiên dưới góc độ hóa học cho học sinh. Tạp chí Khoa học Giáo dục Việt Nam, 18(12), 42-48.
Tải xuống
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Bản quyền (c) 2026 Tạp chí Giáo dục
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .
