Hành vi tự chăm sóc sức khỏe tâm thần của công nhân: Tổng quan nghiên cứu và định hướng tiếp cận trong bối cảnh Việt Nam
Tóm tắt
Workers’ mental health has become an increasingly important concern as adverse working conditions and psychosocial risks continue to grow. However, research on mental health self-care behaviour among workers in Vietnam remains limited. This study presents a narrative review of the literature to clarify the conceptualization of workers’ mental health self-care behaviour, identify its influencing factors, and examine research gaps in the Vietnamese context. Literature was retrieved from Google Scholar, PubMed, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Taylor & Francis Online, and World Health Organization and International Labour Organization sources. Priority was given to publications from 2014 to 2026, while selected seminal studies published before 2014 were included to establish the theoretical foundation. The review identified four main findings. First, workers, particularly migrant workers and those with limited support resources, are at high risk of mental health problems and face barriers to accessing formal mental health services. Second, mental health self-care behaviour should be understood as a psychological and behavioural process involving mental health awareness, emotional regulation, stress management, recovery from work, maintenance of social support, and help-seeking when needed. Third, this behaviour is shaped by both individual resources and organizational and workplace factors. Fourth, research in Vietnam has paid limited attention to the conceptual structure, measurement, influencing factors, and interventions related to workers’ mental health self-care behaviour. The findings suggest that future research and interventions should integrate the strengthening of workers’ self-care capacity with organizational strategies to reduce psychosocial risks and improve access to mental health support.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands-resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273-285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 310-357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Geurts, S. A. E., & Taris, T. W. (2009). Daily recovery from work-related effort during non-work time. In S. Sonnentag, P. L. Perrewé, & D. C. Ganster (Eds.), Current perspectives on job-stress recovery (pp. 85-123). Emerald.
Dimoff, J. K., & Kelloway, E. K. (2019). With a little help from my boss: The impact of workplace mental health training on leader behaviors and employee resource utilization. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 24(1), 4-19. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000126
Do, H. N., Nguyen, A. T., Nguyen, H. Q. T., Bui, T. P., Nguyen, Q. V., Tran, N. T. T., Nguyen, L. H., Pham, H. Q., Ha, G. H., Hoang, C. L., Tran, B. X., Latkin, C. A., Ho, R. C. M., & Ho, C. S. H. (2020). Depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, and mental health service use of industrial workers: Evidence from Vietnam. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(8), Article 2929. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082929
Kelloway, E. K., Dimoff, J. K., & Gilbert, S. (2023). Mental health in the workplace. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10, 363-387. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-050527
Kinnunen, U., Feldt, T., Siltaloppi, M., & Sonnentag, S. (2011). Job demands-resources model in the context of recovery: Testing recovery experiences as mediators. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 20(6), 805-832. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2010.524411
LaMontagne, A. D., Martin, A., Page, K. M., Reavley, N. J., Noblet, A. J., Milner, A. J., Keegel, T., & Smith, P. M. (2014). Workplace mental health: Developing an integrated intervention approach. BMC Psychiatry, 14, Article 131. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-244X-14-131
Nielsen, K., Nielsen, M. B., Ogbonnaya, C., Känsälä, M., Saari, E., & Isaksson, K. (2017). Workplace resources to improve both employee well-being and performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Work & Stress, 31(2), 101-120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2017.1304463
Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2007). The recovery experience questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12(3), 204-221. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204
Tran, B. X., Vu, G. T., Pham, K. T. H., Vuong, Q.-H., Ho, M.-T., Vuong, T.-T., Nguyen, H.-K. T., Nguyen, C. T., Latkin, C. A., Ho, C. S. H., & Ho, R. C. M. (2019). Depressive symptoms among industrial workers in Vietnam and correlated factors: A multi-site survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(9), Article 1642. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16091642
World Health Organization (2022a). WHO guideline on self-care interventions for health and well-being, 2022 revision.
World Health Organization (2022b). WHO guidelines on mental health at work.
World Health Organization (WHO), & International Labour Organization (ILO). (2022). Mental health at work: Policy brief. World Health Organization.
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Bản quyền (c) 2026 Tạp chí Giáo dục
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .









