Các công cụ trí tuệ nhân tạo trong giáo dục: Ứng dụng, lợi ích và thách thức đối với nhà quản lí

Các tác giả

  • Nguyễn Mạnh Trọng Master Learning Hub Academy

Tóm tắt

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) is reshaping educational systems worldwide, particularly in the domains of teaching practices and educational management. This study employs a scoping review approach to analyse 113 scholarly publications published between 2015 and 2025, with the aim of mapping major AI tools and examining their implications for educational leaders and managers. Four main categories of AI tools were identified: adaptive learning systems; assessment and administrative management tools; generative AI tools for content creation; and tools supporting learners with special educational needs. The findings suggest that AI may provide strategic and operational benefits, including data-driven decision-making, resource optimization, and large-scale personalization. However, its implementation also poses substantial challenges related to workforce competence, data ethics and governance, digital inequality, and regulatory uncertainty. Based on these findings, the study proposes three key pillars for effective AI integration in education: strengthening AI literacy among educators and leaders, establishing ethical and data governance frameworks, and ensuring strategic investment in digital infrastructure.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Arksey, H., & O’Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/1364557032000119616

Arnold, K. E., & Pistilli, M. D. (2012). Course signals at Purdue: Using learning analytics to increase student success. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, 267-270. https://doi.org/10.1145/2330601.2330666

Benavides, L. M. C., Tamayo Arias, J. A., Arango Serna, M. D., Branch Bedoya, J. W., & Burgos, D. (2020). Digital transformation in higher education institutions: A systematic literature review. Sensors, 20(11), 3291. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20113291

Bhutoria, A. (2022). Personalized education and artificial intelligence in the United States, China, and India: A systematic review using a human-in-the-loop model. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100068. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100068

Bộ GD-ĐT (2025). Quyết định ban hành Khung nội dung thí điểm giáo dục trí tuệ nhân tạo cho học sinh phổ thông (Quyết định số 3439/QĐ-BGDĐT ngày 15/12/2025). Bộ Giáo dục và Đào tạo. https://moet.gov.vn/van-ban/van-ban-chi-dao-dieu-hanh/quyet-dinh-ban-hanh-khung-noi-dung-thi-diem-giao-duc-tri-tue-nhan-tao-cho-hoc-sinh-pho-thong.html

Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255-284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Hwang, G. J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/

j.caeai.2020.100001

Ifenthaler, D., & Yau, J. Y. K. (2020). Utilising learning analytics to support study success in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(4), 1961-1990. https://doi.org/10.

/s11423-020-09788-z

Kalniņa, D., Nīmante, D., & Baranova, S. (2024). Artificial intelligence for higher education: Benefits and challenges for pre-service teachers. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1501819. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.

1501819

Kulik, J. A., & Fletcher, J. D. (2016). Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 42-78. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315581420

Levac, D., Colquhoun, H., & O'Brien, K. K. (2010). Scoping studies: Advancing the methodology. Implementation Science, 5, 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-5-69

Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. The International Journal of Management Education, 21(2), 100790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790

Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1145/

3376727

Munn, Z., Peters, M. D. J., Stern, C., Tufanaru, C., McArthur, A., & Aromataris, E. (2018). Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 18, 143. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0611-x

Ocen, S., Elasu, J., Aarakit, S. M., & Olupot, C. (2025). Artificial intelligence in higher education institutions: Review of innovations, opportunities and challenges. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1530247. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1530247

OECD (2019). Artificial intelligence in society. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eedfee77-en

O’Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown.

Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2017). Ethics and learning analytics: Charting the (un)charted. In C. Lang, G. Siemens, A. Wise, & D. Gašević (Eds.), Handbook of learning analytics (pp. 49-57). Society for Learning Analytics Research. https://doi.org/10.18608/hla17

Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46(5), 30-40. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2011/9/penetrating-the-fog-analytics-in-learning-and-education

Thủ tướng Chính phủ (2022). Quyết định số 131/QĐ-TTg ngày 25/01/2022 phê duyệt Đề án “Tăng cường ứng dụng công nghệ thông tin và chuyển đổi số trong giáo dục và đào tạo giai đoạn 2022-2025, định hướng đến năm 2030”.

UNESCO (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-and-education-guidance-policy-makers

VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369

Yim, I. H. Y., & Su, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence (AI) learning tools in K-12 education: A scoping review. Journal of Computers in Education, 12, 93-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00304-9

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education - Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Tải xuống

Đã Xuất bản

05.06.2026

Cách trích dẫn

Nguyễn Mạnh Trọng, N. M. T. (2026). Các công cụ trí tuệ nhân tạo trong giáo dục: Ứng dụng, lợi ích và thách thức đối với nhà quản lí. Tạp Chí Giáo dục, 26(11), 22–28. Truy vấn từ https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/6153

Số

Chuyên mục

Các bài báo