Đề xuất mô hình dạy học kĩ năng nói tiếng Anh cho học sinh trung học cơ sở: Trường hợp tích hợp hoạt động thủ công - mĩ thuật theo mô hình “Lớp học đảo ngược”

Các tác giả

  • Nguyễn Thị Kim Loan Trường THCS Lê Văn Tâm, xã Tam Mỹ, Thành phố Đà Nẵng; Học viên cao học Trường Đại học Ngoại ngữ - Đại học Huế
  • Phan Thị Thanh Thảo Trường Đại học Ngoại ngữ - Đại học Huế

Tóm tắt

Currently, in secondary schools, especially in rural areas, developing students' speaking skills still faces many significant challenges. Students often experience anxiety when speaking, lack confidence, and have limited opportunities to communicate. This paper proposes the “Make-and-Speak” pedagogical model, which integrates Arts and Crafts activities into English speaking instruction for lower secondary students through a flipped classroom approach. Grounded in Kolb’s experiential learning theory, Vygotsky’s sociocultural perspective, and Ryan & Deci’s self-determination theory, the study elucidates how physical artistic products serve as “scaffolding” to lower the affective filter and alleviate speaking anxiety. Distinct from isolated teaching techniques, the model is structured as a strategic instructional framework implemented across thematic units. It divides the pedagogical process into two core stages: MAKE (tangible product creation at home) and SPEAK (interactive language production in class). Drawing on evidence from a pilot implementation, the paper analyzes the transition from physical creation to the establishment of product ownership, thereby confirming the model’s feasibility and effectiveness in boosting intrinsic motivation for students in resource-limited rural contexts.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ahmad, T., Shahzada, G., Ali, N., & Khan, A. B. (2024). Participation in arts and crafts activities impact the academic achievement of students at secondary school level. Qlantic Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 100-109. https://doi.org/10.55737/qjss.112197588

Bashori, M., Van Hout, R., Strik, H., & Cucchiarini, C. (2021). Effects of ASR-based websites on EFL learners' vocabulary, speaking anxiety, and language enjoyment. System, 99, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102496

Becker, C., & Roos, J. (2016). An approach to creative speaking activities in the young learners’ classroom. Education Inquiry, 7(1), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.3402/edui.v7.27613

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.

Bộ GD-ĐT (2018). Chương trình giáo dục phổ thông - Chương trình môn Tiếng Anh (Ban hành kèm theo Thông tư số 32/2018/TT-BGDĐT ngày 26/12/2018 của Bộ trưởng Bộ GD-ĐT).

Bộ GD-ĐT (2021). Thông tư số 22/2021/TT-BGDĐT ngày 20/07/2021 ban hành Quy định về đánh giá học sinh trung học cơ sở và học sinh trung học phổ thông.

Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/I.1.1

Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.

Farokhi, M., & Hashemi, M. (2012). The impact/s of using art in English language learning classes. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 923-926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.170

Harmer, J. (2007). How to teach English (2nd ed.). Pearson Longman.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon.

Maley, A., & Peachey, N. (Eds.). (2015). Creativity in the English language classroom. British Council. https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/Creativity.pdf

Nguyen, C., Le, D., & Ngo, H. (2022). EFL teachers’ perceptions of the individualized learning model: A case at an English language center. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 437-456. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2022.15125a

Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298-310. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4378028

Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., & Dirks, K. T. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: Integrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 84-107. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/1089-2680.7.1.84

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860.

Shiobara, F. (2021). Craft and project work for young language learners: Setting up projects to maximize language learning. In C. N. Giannikas (Ed.), Teaching practices and equitable learning in children’s language education (pp. 213-229). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-6487-5.ch011

Shiobara, F. J., & Niboshi, R. (2022). Encouraging language development in young learners through craft activities. In P. Ferguson & R. Derrah (Eds.), Reflections and new perspectives (pp. 1-10). JALT.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (Vol. 86). Harvard university press.

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x

Tải xuống

Đã Xuất bản

05.06.2026

Cách trích dẫn

Nguyễn Thị Kim Loan, N. T. K. L., & Phan Thị Thanh Thảo, P. T. T. T. (2026). Đề xuất mô hình dạy học kĩ năng nói tiếng Anh cho học sinh trung học cơ sở: Trường hợp tích hợp hoạt động thủ công - mĩ thuật theo mô hình “Lớp học đảo ngược”. Tạp Chí Giáo dục, 26(11), 93–99. Truy vấn từ https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/6166

Số

Chuyên mục

Các bài báo