Khuynh hướng tư duy sáng tạo của sinh viên: Một nghiên cứu khám phá bằng phân tích hồ sơ tiềm ẩn
Tóm tắt
Creative thinking dispositions play a crucial role in encouraging students to apply their creative thinking skills actively and sustainably. However, the expression of these dispositions varies considerably depending on individual experiences and specific learning contexts. Using latent profile analysis, this study explores students’ creative thinking disposition profiles across six dimensions: curiosity, innovation seeking, self-discipline, courage, doubt, and flexibility. Data were collected from 574 students at six universities in Vietnam, utilizing the Marmara Creative Thinking Tendency Scale. The results revealed three distinct latent profiles: balanced, less-developed, and flexible creative thinking dispositions. Multinomial logistic regression analysis showed that gender and year in school significantly influence students’ likelihood of belonging to each profile. These findings highlight the heterogeneity of creative thinking dispositions among university students and suggest the need for differentiated educational strategies to foster creativity based on students’ individual profiles.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abraham, A. (2016). Gender and creativity: An overview of psychological and neuroscientific literature. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 10, 609-618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11682-015-9410-8
Alabbasi, A. M. A., Thompson, T. L., Runco, M. A., Alansari, L. A., & Ayoub, A. E. A. (2025). Gender differences in creative potential: A meta-analysis of mean differences and variability. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 19(1), 87-100. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000506
Ayyildiz, P., & Yilmaz, A. (2021). ‘Moving the Kaleidoscope’ to see the effect of creative personality traits on creative thinking dispositions of preservice teachers: The mediating effect of creative learning environments and teachers’ creativity fostering behavior. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 41, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100879
Batey, M. (2012). The measurement of creativity: From definitional consensus to the introduction of a new heuristic framework. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 55-65. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.649181
Beghetto, R. A. (2010). Creativity in the classroom. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 10-30). Cambridge University Press.
Camilleri, D., Munro, J., & Glăveanu, V. P. (2024). Examining disengagement and fostering creativity: A relational perspective on high-ability students in formal education. Gifted Child Today, 47(4), 286-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/10762175241259819
Castillo-Vergara, M., Barrios Galleguillos, N., Jofré Cuello, L., Alvarez-Marin, A., & Acuña-Opazo, C. (2018). Does socioeconomic status influence student creativity? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 29, 142-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.07.005
Darcie, I., Gray, R., & Vander Kloet, M. (2024). Sustaining critical minds: How classroom learning cultures shape student thinking dispositions and practices. Active Learning in Higher Education, 26, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874241303508
Fan, M., & Cai, W. (2022). How does a creative learning environment foster student creativity? An examination on multiple explanatory mechanisms. Current Psychology, 41, 4667-4676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00974-z
Geiser, C. (2013). Data analysis with MPlus. Guilford Press.
Gu, X., Ritter, S. M., Koksma, J., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2021). The influence of school type and perceived teaching style on students’ creativity. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 71, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101084
He, W., & Wong, W. (2011). Gender differences in creative thinking revisited: Findings from analysis of variability. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(7), 807-811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.027
Hwang, J., Hand, B., & French, B. F. (2023). Critical thinking skills and science achievement: A latent profile analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 49, 101349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2023.101349
Jung, T., & Wickrama, K. A. S. (2008). Latent class analysis and growth mixture models. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 2(1), 302-317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00054.x
Kaufman, J. C., Niu, W., Sexton, J. D., & Cole, J. C. (2010). In the eye of the beholder: Differences across ethnicity and gender in evaluating creative work. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(2), 496-511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00584.x
Krumm, G., Lemos, V., & Filippetti, V. A. (2014). Factor structure of the Torrance tests of creative thinking figural form B in Spanish-speaking children: Measurement invariance across gender. Creativity Research Journal, 26(1), 72-81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2013.843908
Lee, Y., & Yoo, S. (2020). Individual profiles and team classes of the climate for creativity: A multilevel latent profile analysis. Creativity and Innovation Management, 29(3), 438-452. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12371
Lucas, B., Claxton, G., & Spencer, E. (2013). Progression in student creativity in school: First steps towards new forms of formative assessments. OECD Education Working Papers, 86, 1-46. https://doi.org/10.1787/19939019
Nakano, T. de C., Oliveira, K. da S., & Zaia, P. (2021). Gender differences in creativity: A systematic literature review. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa, 37, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102.3772e372116
Nasution, E. Y. P., Yulia, P., Anggraini, R. S., & Sari, R. P. and M. (2021). Correlation between mathematical creative thinking ability and mathematical creative thinking disposition in geometry. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1778, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1778/1/012001
Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535-569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396
Özgenel, M. (2018). Modeling the relationships between school administrators’ creative and critical thinking dispositions with decision making styles and problem solving skills. Educational Sciences-Theory & Practice, 18(3), 673-700. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.3.0068
Özgenel, M., & Çetin, M. (2017). Development of the Marmara creative thinking tendencies scale: Validity and reliability study. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 46, 113-132. https://doi.org/10.15285/maruaebd.335087
Paek, S. H., & Runco, M. A. (2018). A latent profile analysis of the criterion-related validity of a divergent thinking test. Creativity Research Journal, 30(2), 212-223. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2018.1446751
Piaw, C. Y. (2014). Effects of gender and thinking style on student’s creative thinking ability. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 5135-5139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1087
Rabello-Mestre, A., & Otondo, F. (2021). Creative dispositions: Teaching for creativity in engineering education. International Journal of Engineering Education, 37(4), 915-924.
Robinson, K. (2012). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. Wiley.
Runco, M. A., Cramond, B., & Pagnani, A. R. (2010). Gender and creativity. In J. Chrisler & D. McCreary (Eds.), Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology (pp. 343-357). Springer.
Soh, K. (2017). Fostering student creativity through teacher behaviors. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 23, 58-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2016.11.002
Tải xuống
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Bản quyền (c) 2026 Tạp chí Giáo dục
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .
