Thực trạng ứng dụng AI trong học tập và nghiên cứu của học viên sau đại học: Nghiên cứu trường hợp tại Học viện Y - Dược học cổ truyền Việt Nam
Tóm tắt
In the context of the increasingly widespread application of artificial intelligence in medical education and academic research, this study aimed to assess the current status of AI use in learning and research among postgraduate students at Viet Nam University of Traditional Medicine. The study employed a cross-sectional descriptive design with an analytical component, collecting data through an online survey of 505 postgraduate students, including Specialist Level I, Specialist Level II, resident physicians, and master’s students, during the 2025-2026 academic year. The results showed that 98.6% of the students had used AI, with ChatGPT being the most commonly used tool; AI was mainly used for searching medical literature, supporting thesis/article writing, and summarizing lessons; most students perceived AI as useful but trusted it only to a moderate extent, while optimism, innovativeness, and attitudes toward AI were positively associated with students’ perceptions and intention to continue using AI. The study indicates the need for official guidelines, skills training, and regulations to promote the safe and responsible use of AI in medical education.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bhullar, P. S., Joshi, M., & Chugh, R. (2024). ChatGPT in higher education - a synthesis of the literature and a future research agenda. Education and Information Technologies, 29(16), 21501-21522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12723-x
Bjelobaba, S., Waddington, L., Perkins, M., Foltýnek, T., Bhattacharyya, S., & Weber-Wulff, D. (2024). Research integrity and GenAI: A systematic analysis of ethical challenges across research phases. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.10134
Brin, D., Sorin, V., Konen, E., Nadkarni, G., Glicksberg, B. S., & Klang, E. (2024). How GPT models perform on the United States medical licensing examination: A systematic review. Discover Applied Sciences, 6(10), 500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-024-06194-5
Chan, C. K. Y., & Hu, W. (2023). Students’ voices on generative AI: Perceptions, benefits, and challenges in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00411-8
Chan, K. S., & Zary, N. (2019). Applications and challenges of implementing artificial intelligence in medical education: Integrative review. JMIR Medical Education, 5(1), e13930. https://doi.org/10.2196/13930
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Đặng Hải Đăng, Bùi Thị Nga (2025). AI và liêm chính học thuật trong giáo dục đại học. Tạp chí Khoa học, Trường Đại học Mở Hà Nội, số đặc biệt 6A, 38-48. https://doi.org/10.59266/houjs.2025.662
Gonsalves, C. (2025). Addressing student non-compliance in AI use declarations: implications for academic integrity and assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 50(4), 592-606. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2415654
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Liu, F., Chang, X., Zhu, Q., Huang, Y., Li, Y., & Wang, H. (2024). Assessing clinical medicine students’ acceptance of large language model: Based on technology acceptance model. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1251. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06232-1
Masters, K. (2019). Artificial intelligence in medical education. Medical Teacher, 41(9), 976-980. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2019.1595557
Parasuraman, A., & Colby, C. L. (2015). An Updated and Streamlined Technology Readiness Index: TRI 2.0. Journal of Service Research, 18(1), 59-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670514539730
Phạm Diệu Linh, Nguyễn Thị Lan Anh, Hoàng Thị Thu Hà (2025). Khảo sát ứng dụng AI trong sàng lọc bệnh võng mạc đái tháo đường tại Bệnh viện E năm 2022 - 2024. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Y học, 188(3), 288-299. https://doi.org/10.52852/tcncyh.v188i3.3134
Rao, A., Pang, M., Kim, J., Kamineni, M., Lie, W., Prasad, A. K., ... Succi, M. D. (2023). Assessing the utility of ChatGPT throughout the entire clinical workflow: Development and usability study. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 25, e48659. https://doi.org/10.2196/48659
Sallam, M. (2023). ChatGPT Utility in Healthcare Education, Research, and Practice: Systematic Review on the Promising Perspectives and Valid Concerns. Healthcare, 11(6), 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11060887
Shahzad, M. F., Xu, S., & Javed, I. (2024). ChatGPT awareness, acceptance, and adoption in higher education: The role of trust as a cornerstone. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00478-x
Techasermwattanakul, P., & Suwannatthachote, P. (2025). The application of generative AI in educational research: A systematic literature review. Journal of Education and Innovation, 27(1), 160-174. https://doi.org/10.71185/jeiejournals.v27i1.278408
World Health Organization (2021). Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: WHO guidance. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240029200
World Health Organization (2024). Ethics and governance of artificial intelligence for health: Guidance on large multi-modal models. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240084759
Zhang, J., & Zhang, Z.-m. (2023). Ethics and governance of trustworthy medical artificial intelligence. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 23(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-023-02103-9
Zhang, Y., Xie, X., & Xu, Q. (2025). ChatGPT in Medical Education: Bibliometric and Visual Analysis. JMIR Medical Education, 11, e72356. https://doi.org/10.2196/72356
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Bản quyền (c) 2026 Tạp chí Giáo dục
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .
