Các đặc điểm tâm trắc của thang đo cảm nhận lòng trắc ẩn ở cha mẹ (PPCS)
Tóm tắt
Given the lack of tools to measure parental compassion from the child’s perspective, this study aimed to develop and evaluate the initial psychometric properties of a scale suitable for the Vietnamese cultural context: the Perceived Parental Compassion Scale. A qualitative approach was used to gather input from three psychologists, followed by a quantitative survey of 585 children aged 12-16 in rural Northern Vietnam. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were then conducted to validate the scale. Starting with 24 items organized into three factors, the combined qualitative and quantitative findings resulted in a two-factor structure: “openness to the child’s suffering” and “effort to alleviate the child’s suffering.” The final scale comprises 13 items for fathers and 12 items for mothers. This tool enables the separate assessment of children’s perceptions of their parents’ compassion. The scale demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties regarding reliability and validity; thus, the Perceived Parental Compassion Scale is a promising tool for future research. Practical implications regarding the scale’s application and recommendations for future studies are also discussed.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abdolali, Z., Sepanta, M., & Afshar Zanjani, H. (2020). The Effectiveness of Compassion-Focused Therapy for Parents on Reducing Aggression, Behavioral Problems, and Anxiety in Children. International Journal of Body, Mind and Culture, 7(3), 172-179. https://doi.org/10.22122/ijbmc.v7i3.222
Acar, I. H., & Yalçıntaş, Z. (2026). Dyadic Examination of Children’s Emotion Regulation in Family Context: Contributions of Coparenting and Parents’ Self-Compassion. Early Childhood Education Journal, 54(2), 953-970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-025-01896-w
Erden, Y., Metin, A., Karakurt, N., & Nacak, U. A. (2025). Development and validation of the perceived compassion scale: A reliable tool for assessing patient-centered nursing care. BMC Nursing, 24(1), 635. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-025-03290-8
Fisher, V., Fraser, L., & Taylor, J. (2023). Experiences of fathers of children with a life-limiting condition: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care, 13(1), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003019
Gopika, C., Bhagyashree, H. S., & Shivappa. (2025). The power of parental compassion: Fostering emotional well-being through Samanya-Vishesha Siddhanta. Samvardhini, 7(2), 164-172. https://samvardhini.in/samvardhini-admin/article_files/1768460185.pdf
Gilbert, P., Catarino, F., Duarte, C., Matos, M., Kolts, R., Stubbs, J., Ceresatto, L., Duarte, J., Pinto-Gouveia, J., & Basran, J. (2017). The development of compassionate engagement and action scales for self and others. Journal of Compassionate Health Care, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40639-017-0033-3
Gilbert, P., McEwan, K., Matos, M., & Rivis, A. (2011). Fears of compassion: Development of three self‐report measures. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 84(3), 239-255. https://doi.org/10.1348/147608310X526511
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2019). Multivariate data analysis. Cengage Learning.
Hoàng Trọng, Chu Nguyễn Mộng Ngọc (2008). Phân tích dữ liệu nghiên cứu với SPSS (tập 2). NXB Hồng Đức.
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An Index of Factorial Simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
Kariyawasam, L., Ononaiye, M., Irons, C., Stopa, L., & Kirby, S. E. (2021). Views and experiences of compassion in Sri Lankan students: An exploratory qualitative study. PLoS One, 16(11), e0260475. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0260475
Kirby, J. N. (2025). Compassion as a transdiagnostic target to reduce mental health symptoms and promote well-being. Nature Reviews Psychology, 4(4), 249-263. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44159-025-00422-4
Lown, B. A., Muncer, S. J., & Chadwick, R. (2015). Can compassionate healthcare be measured? The Schwartz center compassionate care scaleTM. Patient Education and Counseling, 98(8), 1005-1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2015.03.019
McDonald, B., & Kanske, P. (2023). Gender differences in empathy, compassion, and prosocial donations, but not theory of mind in a naturalistic social task. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 20748. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-47747-9
Metin, A., Karakurt, N., Erden, Y., & Nacak, U. A. (2025). Perceived Compassion Scale: A Scale Development Study. Archives of Health Science and Research, 12, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.5152/ArcHealthSciRes.2025.24102
Muris, P., Bongers, K., Schenning, C., Meesters, C., & Otgaar, H. (2022). Self-compassion correlates of anxiety and depression symptoms in youth: A comparison of two self-compassion measures. Children, 9(12), 1930. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9121930
Olivari, M. G., Wahn, E. H., Maridaki-Kassotaki, K., Antonopoulou, K., & Confalonieri, E. (2015). Adolescent Perceptions of Parenting Styles in Sweden, Italy and Greece: An Exploratory Study. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 11(2), 244-258. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v11i2.887
Oliveira, S., Rosado, A., Cunha, M., & Ferreira, C. (2022). The compassionate coach scale as perceived by the athlete: Development and initial validation in Portuguese athletes. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 20(3), 794-812. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2021.1907763
Sousa, R., Castilho, P., Vieira, C., Vagos, P., & Rijo, D. (2017). Dimensionality and gender-based measurement invariance of the Compassion Scale in a community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 182-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.06.003
Strauss, C., Taylor, B. L., Gu, J., Kuyken, W., Baer, R., Jones, F., & Cavanagh, K. (2016). What is compassion and how can we measure it? A review of definitions and measures. Clinical Psychology Review, 47, 15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2016.05.004
Tải xuống
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Bản quyền (c) 2026 Tạp chí Giáo dục
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .
