Hành vi bắt nạt học đường của học sinh có kiểu nhân cách khác nhau: nghiên cứu thực trạng tại một số trường trung học cơ sở trên địa bàn Thành phố Hà Nội

Các tác giả

  • Đỗ Thị Hiền Trường Đại học Thủ đô Hà Nội
  • Nguyễn Văn Kiên Học viện Chính trị - Bộ Quốc phòng

Tóm tắt

School bullying is a matter of concern worldwide and in Viet Nam. This study aims to describe the current situation of school bullying behaviours among lower secondary school students according to different personality types based on the Five-Factor Model. A survey was conducted with 817 students from five lower secondary schools in Hanoi representing urban, peri-urban, and rural areas using the Big Five Questionnaire for Children (BFQ-C) and the Bullying Questionnaire (BQ), which covers four groups of behaviours: physical, verbal, social, and property-related bullying. Teacher interviews and descriptive and correlational statistical analyses were also employed. Findings show that overall levels of bullying were very low across all personality groups; verbal bullying was more common than physical, social, and property-related forms. Students with high sensitivity scored highest in overall bullying, while those with high openness scored lowest, although the differences between groups were small. Correlations between personality traits and bullying behaviours were minimal; sensitivity showed a slight positive association, whereas conscientiousness had a slight negative association with bullying. Based on these results, the article proposes several psychological-educational measures, including personality-responsive social skills education, school counselling, personality-based group interventions, and the development of a positive school environment, to reduce and prevent school bullying among lower secondary students.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation.

Barbaranelli, C., Caprara, G. V., Rabasca, A., & Pastorelli, C. (2003). A questionnaire for measuring the Big Five in late childhood. Personality and Individual Differences, 34(4), 645-664. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00051-X

Cervone, D., & Pervin, L. A. (2022). Personality: Theory and research. John Wiley & Sons.

Coolidge, F. L., DenBoer, J. W., & Segal, D. L. (2004). Personality and neuropsychological correlates of bullying behavior. Personality and Individual differences, 36(7), 1559-1569.

Crick, N. R., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender, and social‐psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66(3), 710-722.

Donnellan, M. B., Trzesniewski, K. H., Robins, R. W., Moffitt, T. E., & Caspi, A. (2005). Low self-esteem is related to aggression, antisocial behavior, and delinquency. Psychological Science, 16(4), 328-335.

Fossati, A., Borroni, S., & Maffei, C. (2012). Bullying as a style of personal relating: Personality characteristics and interpersonal aspects of self‐reports of bullying behaviours among Italian adolescent high school students. Personality and Mental Health, 6(4), 325-339.

Fossati, A., Borroni, S., Eisenberg, N., & Maffei, C. (2010). Relations of proactive and reactive dimensions of aggression to overt and covert narcissism in nonclinical adolescents. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 36(1), 21-27.

Gaffney, H., Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2019). Evaluating the effectiveness of school-bullying prevention programs: An updated meta-analytical review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 45, 111-133.

Goldberg, L. R. (2013). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. In Personality and personality disorders (pp. 34-47). Routledge.

Greenberg, Jerald & Baron, R. A. (2003). Behavior in Organizations, Understanding and Managing the Human Side of the Work, 8th Edition. Prentice Hall.

Hawker, D. S., & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years' research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41(4), 441-455.

John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. Guilford Press.

McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2008). Empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment: Volume 1 - Personality theories and models (pp. 273-294). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200462.n13

Mitsopoulou, E., & Giovazolias, T. (2015). Personality traits, empathy and bullying behavior: A meta-analytic approach. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 21, 61-72.

Nasti, C., Intra, F. S., Palmiero, M., & Brighi, A. (2023). The relationship between personality and bullying among primary school children: the mediation role of trait emotion intelligence and empathy. International Journal of Clinical And Health Psychology, 23(2), 100359.

Nguyễn Mai Hương, Thành Ngọc Minh, Trần Bình Nguyên, Nguyễn Minh Quyết, Trần Thị Ngọc Hồi, Nguyễn Hoài Anh (2023). Bắt nạt học đường và sức khỏe tâm thần của học sinh trung học cơ sở tại Hà Nội. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, 532(2), 259-262.

Nguyễn Thạc, Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Liên (2005). Xu hướng chọn nghề của học sinh trung học phổ thông có kiểu nhân cách khác nhau. Tạp chí Tâm lí học, 6(75), 48-51.

Olweus, D. (1994). Bullying at school: basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 35(7), 1171-1190.

Tani, F., Greenman, P. S., Schneider, B. H., & Fregoso, M. (2003). Bullying and the Big Five: A study of childhood personality and participant roles in bullying incidents. School Psychology International, 24(2), 131-146.

Trần Văn Công, Bahr Weiss, David Cole (2009). Bị bắt nạt bởi bạn cùng lứa và mối liên hệ tới nhận thức bản thân và trầm cảm ở học sinh phổ thông. Tạp chí Tâm lí học, 11(128), 50-59.

Wolke, D., & Lereya, S. T. (2015). Long-term effects of bullying. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 100(9), 879-885.

Đã Xuất bản

31.12.2025

Cách trích dẫn

Đỗ Thị Hiền, Đỗ T. H., & Nguyễn Văn Kiên, N. V. K. (2025). Hành vi bắt nạt học đường của học sinh có kiểu nhân cách khác nhau: nghiên cứu thực trạng tại một số trường trung học cơ sở trên địa bàn Thành phố Hà Nội. Tạp Chí Giáo dục, 26(đặc biệt 11), 313–320. Truy vấn từ https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/4974

Số

Chuyên mục

Các bài báo