Thực trạng năng lực công nghệ số của sinh viên Việt Nam từ góc nhìn tham chiếu khung DigComp EU và MOET
Tóm tắt
Rapid digital transformation has created increasing demands for students’ ability to adapt their digital competence in modern society. This article analyzes the current state of digital technology literacy among Vietnamese students using the Digital Competency Framework issued by MOET and DigComp EU 2.2 framework, which comprises six competencies. The quantitative study using 1,172 survey respondents shows that students' digital technology literacy is generally at an intermediate to advanced level, with a greater emphasis on communication, collaboration, and AI application skills. However, the capacity for digital content creation and in-depth problem-solving remains limited. Significant differences were observed across academic years, majors, and places of residence, while gender and type of educational institution did not produce statistically significant differences. Students in STEM fields and urban areas tended to achieve higher levels of digital technology literacy. Based on the research findings, the article emphasizes the need to enhance digital skills training and bridge the digital divide in higher education.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bộ GD-ĐT (2025). Thông tư số 02/2025/TT-BGDĐT ngày 24/01/2025 về Quy định Khung năng lực số cho người học.
Chea Phal, S., Sok, S., & Chhem, R. (2023). Digital competency and readiness among university students in Asia: The role of educational technology investment. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 18(7), 45-58.
He, T., & Zhu, C. (2017). Digital informal learning among Chinese university students: The effects of digital competence and personal factors. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0082-x
Jin, K. Y., Reichert, F., Cagasan, L. P., de la Torre, J., & Law, N. (2020). Measuring digital literacy across three age cohorts: Exploring test dimensionality and performance differences. Computers & Education, 157, 103968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103968
López-Meneses, E., Sirignano, F. M., Vázquez-Cano, E., & Ramírez-Hurtado, J. M. (2020). University students’ digital competence in three areas of the DigComp 2.1 model: A comparative study at three European universities. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(3), 69-88. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.5583
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Preston, C. C., & Colman, A. M. (2000). Optimal number of response categories in rating scales: Reliability, validity, discriminating power, and respondent preferences. Acta Psychologica, 104(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(99)00050-5
OECD (2021). Digital education outlook 2021: Pushing the frontiers with artificial intelligence, blockchain and robots. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/589b283f-en
Trần Thị Hoài, Nguyễn Thái Bá (2020). Nghiên cứu các năng lực của sinh viên tốt nghiệp thích ứng với cuộc Cách mạng công nghiệp 4.0. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 36(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1159/vnuer.4363
World Economic Forum (2020). The future of jobs report 2020. World Economic Forum.
Tải xuống
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Bản quyền (c) 2026 Tạp chí Giáo dục
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .









