Hoạt động sở hữu trí tuệ trong các cơ sở giáo dục đại học từ góc nhìn của giảng viên: Thực trạng và tương quan giữa các thành tố cấu trúc
Tóm tắt
This study examines intellectual property (IP) activities in Vietnamese higher education as a multi-component system, applying a 10-part framework to analyse interconnections among components from faculty’s perspectives. Using a cross-sectional quantitative design, a survey of 1,551 lecturers from over 50 institutions was analysed with descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and correlation analysis. The instrument comprised 10 components and 41 variables derived from the literature, with reliability assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Findings indicate that IP implementation is moderate, with variation across components. Notably, higher levels appear in natural sciences, engineering, technology, and multidisciplinary institutions, particularly in collaboration, technology transfer, and output-related activities. While most components show no significant gender differences, these findings collectively provide empirical evidence to inform policy improvements and enhance IP management in higher education. It should be acknowledged, however, that the cross-sectional design and convenience sampling may limit generalisability.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abdulai, A.-F., Murphy, L., Thomas, A., & Thomas, B. (2022). Technology transfer offices and their role with information mechanisms for innovation performance in firms: The case of Ghana. Knowledge, 2(4), 719-734. https://doi.org/10.3390/knowledge2040041
Bộ GD-ĐT (2008). Quyết định số 78/2008/QĐ-BGDĐT ngày 29/12/2008 về việc ban hành Quy định quản lí hoạt động sở hữu trí tuệ trong các cơ sở giáo dục đại học.
Cục Sở hữu trí tuệ Việt Nam (2024). Báo cáo thường niên hoạt động sở hữu trí tuệ 2024. NXB Hà Nội.
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Social Science Information, 42(3), 293-337.
Global Innovation Index (2023). Global Innovation Index 2023: Innovation in the face of uncertainty. World Intellectual Property Organization. https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo-pub-2000-2023-en-main-report-global-innovation-index-2023-16th-edition.pdf
Leonidio, U. C., Cardoso, D. O., & Souza, C. G. (2023). Universities patent quality indicators (UPQI): A bibliometric and systematic review. Journal of Scientometric Research, 12(2), 285-304. https://doi.org/10.5530/jscires. 12.2.027
Maskus, K. E. (2000). Intellectual property rights in the global economy. Peterson Institute for International Economics. https://www.piie.com/bookstore/intellectual-property-rights-global-economy
Meyer, M.S., Tang, P. (2007). Exploring the “value” of academic patents: IP management practices in UK universities and their implications for Third-Stream indicators. Scientometrics, 70, 415-440. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0210-9
Mowery, D. C., & Sampat, B. N. (2005). Universities in national innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg, D. C. Mowery, & R. R. Nelson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 209-239). Oxford University Press.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Nguyen, H. X., Tran, L. H., & Nguyen, T. L. H. (2020). Solutions to promote commercialization of research results in Vietnamese universities. Journal of Business and Economic Development, 5(2), 82-89. https://doi.org/
11648/j.jbed.20200502.14
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2022). Valuation and exploitation of intellectual property. OECD Publishing.
Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A., & Sobrero, M. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university-industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
Phạm Thị Thuý Hằng (2020). Thực trạng hoạt động sở hữu trí tuệ ở các trường đại học khu vực miền Trung Việt Nam. Tạp chí Khoa học, Trường Đại học Sư phạm Hà Nội, 65(4C), 255-266.
Quốc hội (2022). Luật sửa đổi, bổ sung một số điều của Luật Sở hữu trí tuệ. Luật số 07/2022/QH15, ban hành ngày 16/6/2022.
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2003b). Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: Improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 14(1), 111-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(03)00007-5
Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. N. (2003a). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27-48.
Tavakol, M., & Dennick, R. (2011). Making sense of Cronbach’s alpha. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 53-55. https://doi.org/10.5116/ijme.4dfb.8dfd
Thủ tướng Chính phủ (2019). Quyết định số 1068/QĐ-TTg ngày 22/8/2019 phê duyệt Chiến lược Sở hữu trí tuệ đến năm 2030.
WIPO - World Intellectual Property Organization (2021). Intellectual property policy template for universities and research institutions. WIPO.
WIPO - World Intellectual Property Organization (2023). Universities and intellectual property. https://www.wipo.
int/en/web/universities
Yang, J., Hamdan-Livramento, I., Le Feuvre, B., Wunsch-Vincent, S., & Zhou, H. (2021). Measuring global patenting of universities and public research institutes. In A. Arundel, S. Athreye, & S. Wunsch-Vincent (Eds.), Harnessing public research for innovation in the 21st century: An international assessment of knowledge transfer policies (pp. 80-138). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108904230.012
Tải xuống
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .
