Các thang đo động lực học tập trong giáo dục đại học

Các tác giả

  • Phạm Thị Thanh Hương Trường Đại học Giáo dục - Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội; Trường Đại học VinUni
  • Đặng Thị Thanh Thủy Trường Đại học Giáo dục - Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội

Tóm tắt

Motivation measurement scales, grounded in educational and behavioral psychology, offer valuable insights into the multidimensional nature of student motivation and its link to learning outcomes. In Vietnam, most research has focused on teaching quality, curriculum, and satisfaction, with limited use of standardized motivation scales. This paper reviews four major scales widely applied in educational research: the Academic Motivation Scale (AMS), Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ), Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS), and MUSIC® Model of Academic Motivation. Each scale or model is rooted in well-established psychological theories and has been empirically validated across diverse higher-education settings. AMS distinguishes intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation components; MSLQ integrates motivation and learning strategies; IMMS evaluates the motivational impact of instructional materials; and MUSIC assesses students’ perceptions of empowerment, usefulness, success, interest, and caring. The study also highlights the strengths and limitations of each framework and recommends their adaptation and integration for research and practice in Vietnam’s higher-education context.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Biechler, R., & Snowman, J. (1993). Psychology Applied to Teaching. 7th. Toronto: Houghton Mifften Company.

Brooks, C. F., & Young, S. L. (2011). Are Choice-Making Opportunities Needed in the Classroom? Using Self-Determination Theory to Consider Student Motivation and Learner Empowerment. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(1), 48-59.

Cook, D. A., & Skrupky, L. P. (2025). Validation of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire and instructional materials motivation survey. Medical Teacher, 47(4), 635-645. https://doi.org/10.1080/

x.2024.2357278

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.

Duncan, T. G., & McKeachie, W. J. (2005). The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist, 40(2), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4002_6

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059

Harlen, W., Crick, R. D., Broadfoot, P., Daugherty, R., Gardner, J., James, M., & Stobart, G. (2002). A systematic review of the impact of summative assessment and tests on students’ motivation for learning. EPPI-Centre.

Herpratiwi, H., & Ahmad, T. (2021). Learning interest and discipline on learning motivation. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 10(2), 424-435. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijemst.2290

Hoàng Thị Mỹ Nga, Nguyễn Tuấn Kiệt (2016). Phân tích các nhân tố tác động đến động lực học tập của sinh viên Kinh tế Trường Đại học Cần Thơ. Tạp chí Khoa học, Trường Đại học Cần Thơ, 46, 107-115. https://doi.org/

22144/ctu.jvn.2016.575

Honicke, T., Broadbent, J., & Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. (2020). Learner self-efficacy, goal orientation, and academic achievement: exploring mediating and moderating relationships. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(4), 689-703. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1685941

Jones, B. D. (2009). Motivating students to engage in learning: the MUSIC model of academic motivation. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 21(2), 272-285.

Jones, B. D. (2018). Motivating students by design: Practical strategies for professors. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.

Keller, J. M. (1984). The use of the ARCS model of motivation in teacher training. Aspects of Educational Technology, 17, 140-145.

Kessels, G., Xu, K., Dirkx, K., & Martens, R. (2024). Flexible assessments as a tool to improve student motivation: an explorative study on student motivation for flexible assessments. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/

3389/feduc.2024.1290977

Kew, S. N., Petsangsri, S., Ratanaolarn, T., & Tasir, Z. (2018). Examining the motivation level of students in e-learning in higher education institution in Thailand: A case study. Education and Information Technologies, 23(6), 2947-2967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9753-z

Loorbach, N., Peters, O., Karreman, J., & Steehouder, M. (2015). Validation of the Instructional Materials Motivation Survey (IMMS) in a self‐directed instructional setting aimed at working with technology. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 204-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12138

Mubeen, S., & Reid, N. (2014). The Measurement of Motivation with Science Student. European Journal of Educational Research, 3(3), 129-144. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.3.3.129

Nguyễn Minh Hải, Thân Thị Thùy Linh (2024). Nhân tố ảnh hưởng đến động lực học tập của sinh viên Khoa Du lịch Trường Đại học Khánh Hòa. Tạp chí Khoa học và Kinh tế phát triển, 30, 17-27.

Nguyễn Thị Trâm Anh, Nguyễn Bá Phu (2023). Động cơ và sự trì hoãn trong học tập của sinh viên Trường Đại học Sư phạm - Đại học Huế: Thực trạng và khuyến nghị. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 23(24), 41-45. https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/1135

Perry, S. (2024). Podcasting as a form of assessment: increasing student motivation in academic English-speaking assessment. Language Testing in Asia, 14(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-024-00288-y

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). The Regents of The University of Michigan.

Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(3), 801-813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024

Radovan, M., & Makovec, D. (2015). Relations between students’ motivation, and perceptions of the learning environment. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 5(2), 115-138. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.145

Reeve, J. (2024). Understanding motivation and emotion. John Wiley & Sons.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860

Stover, J. B., de la Iglesia, G., Boubeta, A. R., & Liporace, M. F. (2012). Academic Motivation Scale: adaptation and psychometric analyses for high school and college students. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 5, 71-83. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S33188

Sullivan, A. M. (2002). The nature of student empowerment. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/

_The_Nature_of_Student_Empowerment

Trotter, E. (2006). Student perceptions of continuous summative assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(5), 505-521. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679506

Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Briere, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003-1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025

Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., Senecal, C., & Vallieres, E. F. (1993). On the assessment of intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivation in education: Evidence on the concurrent and construct validity of the Academic Motivation Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53(1), 159-172. https://doi.org/

1177/0013164493053001018

Walker, A., Aguiar, N. R., Soicher, R. N., Kuo, Y.-C., & Resig, J. (2024). Exploring the Relationship between Motivation and Academic Performance among Online and Blended Learners: A Meta-Analytic Review. Online Learning, 28(4), 76-116. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i4.4602

Wentzel, K. R., Wigfield, A., & Miele, D. (2009). Handbook of motivation at school (Vol. 704). Routledge New York, NY.

Yilmaz, E., Sahin, M., & Turgut, M. (2017). Variables affecting student motivation based on academic publications. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(12), 112-120.

Đã Xuất bản

25.05.2026

Cách trích dẫn

Phạm Thị Thanh Hương, P. T. T. H., & Đặng Thị Thanh Thủy Đặng T. T. T. (2026). Các thang đo động lực học tập trong giáo dục đại học. Tạp Chí Giáo dục, 26(đặc biệt 2), 29–36. Truy vấn từ https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/5810

Số

Chuyên mục

Các bài báo