Tổng quan nghiên cứu về mối liên hệ giữa thiên kiến giới và thể hiện giới ở sinh viên sư phạm

Các tác giả

  • Trần Bảo Ngọc Hà Trường Khoa học Giáo dục - Trường Đại học Sư phạm Hà Nội
  • Khúc Năng Toàn Trường Khoa học Giáo dục - Trường Đại học Sư phạm Hà Nội

Tóm tắt

This study employed a thematic integrative literature review to synthesise Vietnamese and international evidence on gender bias, gender expression, and the relationship between these two constructs among pre-service teachers. The literature search and updating process was conducted from December 2025 to June 2026. Following screening and classification, 22 publications were included in the synthesis, comprising 11 theoretical, conceptual, or review sources and 11 empirical studies or reports. The findings indicate that research on gender bias has predominantly focused on stereotypes, expectations, and evaluative judgements, whereas studies of gender expression have placed greater emphasis on the negotiation of masculinity, femininity, and professional identity. Bridging evidence suggests that gendered expectations and norms may shape how pre-service teachers regulate their professional demeanour, emotional expression, authority, caregiving practices, and professional self-presentation. However, no study was identified that directly examined gender bias and gender expression simultaneously within the same sample of pre-service teachers. Accordingly, the relationship between the two constructs is currently supported mainly by indirect evidence and remains insufficiently established to warrant causal conclusions. The review highlights the need for clearer conceptual boundaries, contextually appropriate measurement tools, and greater use of mixed-methods research in Vietnamese teacher education.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

American Psychological Association (2015). Guidelines for psychological practice with transgender and gender nonconforming people. American Psychologist, 70(9), 832-864. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039906

Beijaard, D., Meijer, P. C., & Verloop, N. (2004). Reconsidering research on teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(2), 107-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.07.001

Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88(4), 354-364. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354

Bùi, T. L., Phan, Y. N., Sùng, T. N., & Cứ, T. P. (2024). Current status of gender prejudice of teachers at some preschools in Hanoi City. HNUE Journal of Science: Educational Sciences, 69(4A), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1075.2024-0078

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203824979

Denessen, E., Hornstra, L., van den Bergh, L., & Bijlstra, G. (2022). Implicit measures of teachers’ attitudes and stereotypes, and their effects on teacher practice and student outcomes: A review. Learning and Instruction, 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101437

Doornkamp, L., Van der Pol, L. D., Groeneveld, S., Mesman, J., Endendijk, J. J., & Groeneveld, M. G. (2022). Understanding gender bias in teachers’ grading: The role of gender stereotypical beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103826

Fink, K., Weiß, H., McGuire, L., Mulvey, K. L., & Beißert, H. (2025). Teachers’ and pre-service teachers’ (stereotypical) expectations regarding children’s competencies in different STEM fields. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 28(5), 1103-1122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-025-01352-w

Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4-27. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.4

Gullberg, A., Andersson, K., Danielsson, A., Scantlebury, K., & Hussénius, A. (2018). Pre-service teachers’ views of the child—Reproducing or challenging gender stereotypes in science in preschool. Research in Science Education, 48(4), 691-715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9593-z

Hoang Yen, N., Xuan, B., Mai Ha, N., Diep, B., Chien, N., Long, N., … Jones, T. (2016). Reaching out: Preventing and addressing SOGIE-related school violence in Viet Nam. UNESCO, Paris; Ha Noi; Bangkok. https://doi.org/10.54675/XICP3981

Hong, Q. N., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., Dagenais, P., … Pluye, P. (2018). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers. Education for Information, 34(4), 285-291. https://doi.org/10.3233/EFI-180221

Hong, Q. N., Pluye, P., Fàbregues, S., Bartlett, G., Boardman, F., Cargo, M., … Vedel, I. (2019). Improving the content validity of the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool: A modified e-Delphi study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 111, 49-59.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.03.008

Mai Thi Thuy Dung, & Brundrett, M. (2021). The efficacy of the SECI model for the training of high school teachers in relation to gender equality in Vietnam. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 37(4), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1159/vnuer.4530

Miralles-Cardona, C. (2025). Teaching gender equality in teacher education: Does existing practice actually support gender mainstreaming implementation? Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1570115

Moosa, S., & Bhana, D. (2023). Men who teach early childhood education: Mediating masculinity, authority and sexuality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103959

Nguyen, T. B. P., & Pham, K. L. (2025). The teacher within: Shaping preservice teacher identity through private tutoring. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 41(1S), 135-151. https://doi.org/10.63023/2525-2445/jfs.ulis.5427

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Pearse, R. (2017). Gender bias. In F. M. Moghaddam, & F. M. Moghaddam (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Political Behavior (1 ed., Vol. 1, pp. 319-322). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483391144.n147

Phan, A. N., & Pham, T. X. (2021). Gender stereotypes as hidden curriculum: A case of Vietnamese English textbooks. International Journal of Education, 14(1), 30-38. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v14i1.30553

Ridgeway, C. L. (2011). Framed by gender: How gender inequality persists in the modern world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199755776.001.0001

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8, 45. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-8-45

Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404-428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606

West, C., & Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125-151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002

Whittemore, R., & Knafl, K. (2005). The integrative review: Updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 52(5), 546-553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03621.x

Xu, H. (2025). From male pre-service teachers to pre-service male teachers: Constructing masculinity in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 160, Article 105036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2025.105036

Zhang, Y. E., & Darvin, R. (2025). Negotiating gender ideologies and investing in teacher identities: The motivation and investment of EFL pre-service teachers. System, 133, Article 103669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103669

Đã Xuất bản

15.08.2026

Cách trích dẫn

Trần, B. N. H., & Khúc, N. T. (2026). Tổng quan nghiên cứu về mối liên hệ giữa thiên kiến giới và thể hiện giới ở sinh viên sư phạm. Tạp Chí Giáo dục, 26(đặc biệt 11), 518–527. Truy vấn từ https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/6889

Số

Chuyên mục

Các bài báo