Sử dụng hướng dẫn chiến lược nhận thức (CSI) hỗ trợ học sinh có khó khăn về học Toán trong môn Toán lớp 2

Các tác giả

  • Vũ Kim Chi Học viên Cao học K35, Trường Đại học Sư phạm Hà Nội
  • Nguyễn Thị Cẩm Hường Trường Đại học Sư phạm Hà Nội
  • Đinh Nguyễn Trang Thu Trường Đại học Sư phạm Hà Nội

Tóm tắt

In inclusive education, Cognitive Strategy Instruction (CSI) is an evidence-based intervention method that has proven highly effective at the secondary level. However, primary students with mathematics difficulties frequently face major barriers in acquiring and applying abstract mathematical concepts. Unlike prior research that relied predominantly on direct teacher-led interventions, this study proposes a pedagogical intervention centered on Cognitive Strategy Instruction (CSI), operationalized through a visually engaging and structured “Grade 2 Math Self-Study Handbook”. The study employed a pedagogical experiment integrated with a situational survey involving three Grade 2 students exhibiting mathematics difficulties, 20 teachers, three parents, and structured classroom observations. The results showed that students’ mean mathematics assessment scores increased from 3.17 at pre-test to 6.33 at post-test following the implementation of the CSI approach. In addition, more than 90% of teachers reported that they would be willing to implement the CSI approach if adequate instructional materials and implementation guidance were available. These results affirm the effectiveness of Cognitive Strategy Instruction (CSI) and the “Self-Study Handbook” in supporting students with mathematics difficulties, thereby contributing to the promotion of differentiated instruction and inclusive education. Based on these findings, it is recommended to expand this model to other grade levels and develop corresponding digital learning tools.

Tài liệu tham khảo

American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders DSM-5 (5th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

Bộ GD-ĐT (2018). Chương trình giáo dục phổ thông: Chương trình tổng thể (ban hành kèm theo Thông tư số 32/2018/TT-BGDĐT ngày 26/12/2018 của Bộ trưởng Bộ GD-ĐT).

Jitendra, A. K., & Xin, Y. P. (1997). Mathematical word-problem-solving instruction for students with mild disabilities and students at risk for math failure: A research synthesis. The Journal of Special Education, 30(4), 412-438. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246699703000404

Kong, J. E., Yan, C., Serceki, A., & Swanson, H. L. (2021). Word-problem-solving interventions for elementary students with learning disabilities: A selective meta-analysis of the literature. Learning Disability Quarterly, 44(4), 248-260. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948721994843

Krawec, J., Huang, J., Montague, M., Kressler, B., & de Alba, A. M. (2013). The effects of cognitive strategy instruction on knowledge of math problem-solving processes of middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 36(2), 80-92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948712463368

Montague, M. (1984). The effect of cognitive strategy training on verbal math problem solving performance of learning disabled adolescents (Publication No. 8415053) (Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona). https://scispace.com/pdf/the-effect-of-cognitive-strategy-training-on-verbal-math-5f77w01oe9.pdf

Montague, M., & Bos, C. S. (1986). The effect of cognitive strategy training on verbal math problem solving performance of learning disabled adolescents. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19(1), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948601900107

Nguyễn Thị Cẩm Hường, Bùi Thế Hợp, Nguyễn Công Khanh, Đỗ Thị Thảo, Nguyễn Nữ Tâm An (2022). Đánh giá khuyết tật học tập: Xu thế hiện nay và định hướng trên phương diện nghiên cứu ở Việt Nam. Tạp chí Khoa học, Trường Đại học Sư phạm Hà Nội, 67(2), 82-91. https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1075.2022-0025

Phan Thanh Long, Phan Thế Hải (2022). Dạy học phép nhân cho học sinh lớp 2 có khó khăn về học Toán bằng phần mềm dạy học. Tạp chí Khoa học, Trường Đại học Sư phạm Hà Nội, 67(2), 58-70. https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1075.2022-0023

Raven, J. (2000). The Raven’s progressive matrices: Change and stability over culture and time. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 1-48. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1999.0735

Swanson, H. L., & Beebe-Frankenberger, M. (2004). The relationship between working memory and mathematical problem solving in children at risk and not at risk for serious math difficulties. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 471-491. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.471

Swanson, H. L., & Hoskyn, M. (1998). Experimental intervention research on students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. Review of Educational Research, 68(3), 277-321. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543068003277

Đã Xuất bản

15.08.2026

Cách trích dẫn

Vũ Kim, C., Nguyễn Thị, C. H., & Đinh Nguyễn, T. T. (2026). Sử dụng hướng dẫn chiến lược nhận thức (CSI) hỗ trợ học sinh có khó khăn về học Toán trong môn Toán lớp 2. Tạp Chí Giáo dục, 26(đặc biệt 11), 130–136. Truy vấn từ https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/7082

Số

Chuyên mục

Các bài báo