Nghiên cứu xây dựng tiêu chí đánh giá năng lực hành nghề cho sinh viên đại học ngành Ngôn ngữ Anh
Tóm tắt
An employability assessment tool based on the Employability Capital Growth Model was constructed by Pham et al. (2025). However, this tool remains in its preliminary stage, and expert feedback has not yet been solicited to examine its content validity as guided by Carpenter (2018). This paper presents the process of collecting feedback from 20 experts to refine the assessment tool through two steps: an online survey and focus group interviews. Twenty experts who participated in the study were divided into four groups: lecturers, employers, alumni, and students. These experts evaluated the suitability of the assessment tool via a Google Forms before taking part in group interviews, which were conducted face-to-face for the student group and online for the other three groups. The survey results indicated that 19 items were deemed appropriate, while 31 items required modification. Following the interviews, the assessment tool was revised to enhance its initial content validity and practical applicability. In the next stage, a large-scale survey involving students can be conducted for further refinement and finalization of the assessment tool in line with the steps suggested by Carpenter (2018).
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bridgstock, R., & Jackson, D. (2019). Strategic institutional approaches to graduate employability: navigating meanings, measurements and what really matters. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 41(5), 468-484. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2019.1646378
Carpenter, S. (2018). Ten Steps in Scale Development and Reporting: A Guide for Researchers. Communication Methods and Measures, 12(1), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2017.1396583
Churchill, G. A. (1979). A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, XVI, 64-73.
Donald, W. E. (2025). Developing Employability Capital in University Students: A Practical Guide. In Developing Employability Capital in University Students: A Practical Guide. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003562429
Donald, W. E., Baruch, Y., & Ashleigh, M. (2019). The undergraduate self-perception of employability: human capital, careers advice, and career ownership. Studies in Higher Education, 44(4), 599-614. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1387107
Donald, W. E., Baruch, Y., & Ashleigh, M. J. (2023). Introducing the employability capital growth model (ECGM). Career Matters, 11(4), 38-39.
Donald, W. E., Baruch, Y., & Ashleigh, M. J. (2024). Construction and operationalisation of an Employability Capital Growth Model (ECGM) via a systematic literature review (2016-2022). Studies in Higher Education, 49(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2219270
Elangovan, N., & Sundaravel, E. (2021). Method of preparing a document for survey instrument validation by experts. MethodsX, 8, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101326
Hinkin, T. R., Tracey, J. B., & Enz, C. A. (1997). Scale construction: Developing reliable and valid measurement instruments. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 21(1), 100-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/
Hsu, C. C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 12(10), 1-8.
Keeney, S., Hasson, F., & McKenna, H. P. (2006). Consulting the oracle: Ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 53(2), 205-212. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2006.03716.x
Phạm Đức Long, Nguyễn Thúy Nga, Dương Gia Hân, Nguyễn Gia Linh (2025). Xây dựng tiêu chí đánh giá năng lực hành nghề cho sinh viên đại học dựa trên mô hình phát triển vốn năng lực hành nghề (Employability Capital Growth Model). Tạp chí Giáo dục, 25(23), 1-5. https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/
Pham, H., Le, K., Nguyen, H., Nguyen, T., & Donald, W. E. (2025). Operationalisation and exploration of the Employability Capital Growth Model (ECGM): insights from university students in Vietnam. Education + Training, 1-18. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-02-2025-0067
Sanchez, C., & Dunning, D. (2023). Are experts overconfident?: An interdisciplinary review. In Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 43). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2023.100195
Von Soest, C. (2023). Why Do We Speak to Experts? Reviving the Strength of the Expert Interview Method. Perspectives on Politics, 21(1), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592722001116
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Bản quyền (c) 2026 Tạp chí Giáo dục
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .
