Áp dụng mô hình KAP để khảo sát việc sử dụng AI có trách nhiệm của sinh viên: Nghiên cứu tại Trường Đại học Khoa học Xã hội và Nhân văn - Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội
Tóm tắt
The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) is creating many changes in higher education and raising issues related to academic ethics and students’ dependence on technology. This study investigates the knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding responsible AI use among students at the University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Vietnam National University, Hanoi, based on the KAP model and an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, including a survey of 360 students and semi-structured in-depth interviews. The research findings show that students have relatively positive knowledge and attitudes toward responsible AI use; however, their actual AI usage practices remain inconsistent and are strongly influenced by the learning context. Qualitative data indicate that many students have not clearly identified the boundary between learning support and AI dependence in academic activities. The findings emphasize the role of universities in guiding responsible AI use. Accordingly, the study proposes strengthening academic ethics education and implementing digital competency frameworks for students. At the same time, further studies are needed to more fully explain AI usage behaviors among students.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Abbas, M., Jam, F. A., & Khan, T. I. (2024). Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7
Bittle, K., & El-Gayar, O. (2025). Generative AI and Academic Integrity in Higher Education: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda. Information, 16(4), 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040296
Cotton, D. R., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Đặng Văn Em, Nguyễn Đình Loan Phương, Nguyễn Thị Hảo (2024). Thực trạng ứng dụng ChatGPT trong việc học tập, nghiên cứu của sinh viên Đại học Quốc gia Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 24(1), 36-41. https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/1212
Hair, J. F., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Black, W. C. (2019). Multivariate Data Analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Ivankova, N. V., Creswell, J. W., & Stick, S. L. (2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05282260
Kiều Phương Thùy, Nguyễn Khắc Ân, Vũ Thái Giang (2025). Một số phương pháp ứng dụng tư duy phản biện khi sử dụng AI tạo sinh trong giáo dục phổ thông. Tạp chí Khoa học, Trường Đại học Sư phạm Hà Nội, 70(3), 161-172. https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1075.2025-0060
Lintner, T. (2024). A systematic review of AI literacy scales. npj Science of Learning, 9, 50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00264-4
National Institute of Standards and Technology (2023). Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) (NIST AI 100-1). https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.AI.100-1
OECD (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Society. https://doi.org/10.1787/eedfee77-en
OECD (2024). Explanatory memorandum on the updated OECD definition of an AI system: OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers, No. 8. https://doi.org/10.1787/623da898-en
Qu, Y., Tan, M. X. Y., & Wang, J. (2024). Disciplinary differences in undergraduate students' engagement with generative artificial intelligence. Smart Learning Environments, 11, 51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00341-6
Randall, D. M., & Fernandes, M. F. (1991). The social desirability response bias in ethics research. Journal of
Business Ethics, 10(11), 805-817. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF00383696
Sanchez, J. M. P., Sumalinog, G. G., Mananay, J. A., Goles, C. E., Alejandro, I. M. V., & Fernandez, C. B. (2025). Scale development and validation of knowledge-attitudes-practices (KAP) on artificial intelligence (AI) productivity tools in education. STEM Education, 5(6), 1022-1057. https://doi.org/10.3934/steme.2025045
UNESCO (2021a). Artificial intelligence in education. https://www.unesco.org/en/digital-education/artificial-intelligence
UNESCO (2021b). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137
UNESCO (2024). AI competency framework for students. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391105
World Health Organization (2008). Advocacy, communication and social mobilization for TB control: A guide to developing knowledge, attitude and practice surveys. https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/a08347d2-942d-42ae-9ff3-b1569895a923/content
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education - where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 39. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Tải xuống
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Bản quyền (c) 2026 Tạp chí Giáo dục
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .
