Phát triển và áp dụng bộ công cụ đánh giá năng lực giao tiếp, hợp tác và trách nhiệm nghề nghiệp của sinh viên y khoa theo chuẩn đầu ra

Các tác giả

  • Vũ Thị Thu Hằng Trường Đại học Giáo dục - Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội; Trường Đại học Y Dược Hải Phòng
  • Nguyễn Hữu Cương Trường Đại học Phương Đông
  • Kim Bảo Giang Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội

Tóm tắt

Competency-based medical education (CBME) requires the assessment of program learning outcomes (PLOs) to be strictly aligned with clinical practice using appropriate measurement tools. This study aims to develop, apply, and evaluate the feasibility of a standardized tool for assessing PLO. Communication, collaboration, autonomy, and professional responsibility competencies among medical students at Hai Phong University of Medicine and Pharmacy. The assessment revealed that 100% of the participating students successfully achieved the PLO benchmarks. However, a distinct stratification in proficiency levels emerged: 190 students (68.35%) achieved an excellent level, 83 students (29.86%) reached a good-to-very-good level, and 5 students (1.79%) performed at an average level, with no students falling into the unsatisfactory category. Students demonstrated strong performance in basic communication with patients and relatives, as well as effective teamwork with peers. Qualitative analysis elucidated that this variation in competency was primarily driven by individual attributes, prior practical experience, and the degree of active participation in clinical rotations. This study confirms that the standardized behavioral checklist is a feasible and highly discriminative instrument for evaluating soft skills and professional attitudes in medical students. The findings indicate that the current learning and clinical practice environments provide supportive conditions for cultivating competencies required by PLO. To further improve training quality, the curriculum should continue integrating contemporary competency assessment frameworks and track student progress through longitudinal tracking.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Aspegren, K. (1999). BEME Guide No. 2: Teaching and learning communication skills in medicine-a review with quality grading of articles. Medical Teacher, 21(6), 563-570.

Baboolal, S. O., & Singaram, V. S. (2023). Specialist training: workplace-based assessments impact on teaching, learning and feedback to support competency-based postgraduate programs. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 941.

Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (1994). Principles of biomedical ethics. Edicoes Loyola.

Bộ Y tế (2015). Quyết định số 1854/QĐ-BYT về việc phê duyệt tài liệu “Chuẩn năng lực cơ bản của bác sĩ đa khoa”.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Council, G. M. (2018). Outcomes for graduates. General Medical Council.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.

Frank, J. R., Snell, L., Sherbino, J., & Boucher, A. (2015). CanMEDS 2015. Physician competency framework series I.

Frank, J. R., Snell, L. S., Cate, O. T., Holmboe, E. S., Carraccio, C., Swing, S. R., Harris, P., Glasgow, N. J., Campbell, C., & Dath, D. (2010). Competency-based medical education: theory to practice. Medical Teacher, 32(8), 638-645.

Harden, R. M. (2015). Misconceptions and the OSCE. Medical Teacher, 37(7), 608-610.

Hodges, B. (2003). Validity and the OSCE. Medical Teacher, 25(3), 250-254.

Kurtz, S., Draper, J., & Silverman, J. (2017). Teaching and learning communication skills in medicine. CRC press.

Kurtz, S., Silverman, J., Benson, J., & Draper, J. (2003). Marrying content and process in clinical method teaching: enhancing the Calgary-Cambridge guides. Academic Medicine, 78(8), 802-809.

World Health Organization (2024). Universal health coverage.

World Federation for Medical Education (2024). WFME global standards for quality improvement of medical education. https://wfme.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/WFME-Standards-for-Continuing-Professional-Development_2024_

final.pdf

Đã Xuất bản

30.06.2026

Cách trích dẫn

Vũ Thị Thu Hằng, V. T. T. H., Nguyễn Hữu Cương, N. H. C., & Kim Bảo Giang, K. B. G. (2026). Phát triển và áp dụng bộ công cụ đánh giá năng lực giao tiếp, hợp tác và trách nhiệm nghề nghiệp của sinh viên y khoa theo chuẩn đầu ra. Tạp Chí Giáo dục, 26(đặc biệt 7), 1–8. Truy vấn từ https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/6133

Số

Chuyên mục

Các bài báo

Các bài báo được đọc nhiều nhất của cùng tác giả