Tổng quan các yếu tố ảnh hưởng và định hướng tổ chức đào tạo phát triển năng lực giáo dục STEM cho sinh viên ngành Giáo dục tiểu học theo tiếp cận CDIO
Tóm tắt
Developing STEM education competencies in pre-service primary school teachers has become a critical requirement in the context of competency-based teacher education reforms. However, existing studies have primarily focused on describing competency frameworks or evaluating the effectiveness of specific training models, while insufficient attention has been paid to the factors influencing competency development and their implications for teacher education. This study employed theoretical analysis and a literature review to identify the factors influencing the development of STEM education competencies using the CDIO approach. The findings identified four major groups of influencing factors: curriculum structure, learning organization methods, the learning environment and training ecosystem, and learners' individual characteristics. Based on these findings, this study proposes implications for organizing teacher education through the CDIO approach to foster STEM education competencies in pre-service primary school teachers. The findings contribute to the theoretical foundation of STEM teacher education and provide a useful reference for innovating teacher education programs to meet the demands of STEM education in contemporary educational contexts.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bybee, R. W. (2010). Advancing STEM education: A 2020 vision. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(1), 30-35.
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., & Brodeur, D. R. (2007). Rethinking engineering education: The CDIO approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-38290-6
Crawley, E. F., Malmqvist, J., Östlund, S., & Brodeur, D. R. (2014). Rethinking engineering education: The CDIO approach (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05561-9
English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1
Hà Thị Lan Hương (2020). Giáo dục STEM ở nhà trường phổ thông và vấn đề xây dựng khung năng lực cho sinh viên sư phạm. Tạp chí Khoa học, Trường Đại học Sư phạm Hà Nội, 65(4C), 196-203. https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1075.2020-0040
Hansen, G., & Sindre, G. (2023, June). Assessment and feedback across various outcomes in project-courses: A department-wide study. In Proceedings of the 19th International CDIO Conference (pp. 913-922). NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Hofer M., & Grandgenett, N. (2012). TPACK development in teacher education, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(1), 83-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2012.10782598
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3, Article 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z
Klassen, R. M., Tze, V. M. C., Betts, S. M., & Gordon, K. A. (2011). Teacher efficacy research 1998-2009: Signs of progress or unfulfilled promise? Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 21-43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-010-9141-8
Malmqvist, J., Hugo, R., & Kjellberg, M. (2015, June 8-11). A survey of CDIO implementation globally: Effects on educational quality, barriers to implementation, and factors leading to success. In Proceedings of the 11th International CDIO Conference, Chengdu, China.
Malmqvist, J., Lundqvist, U., Rosén, A., & Edström, K. (2022). The CDIO syllabus 3.0: An updated statement of goals. In Proceedings of the 18th International CDIO Conference (pp. 1-12). Reykjavik, Iceland.
Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
Moore, T. J., Stohlmann, M. S., Wang, H.-H., Tank, K. M., Glancy, A. W., & Roehrig, G. H. (2015). Implementation and integration of engineering in K-12 STEM education. In Ş. Purzer, J. Strobel, & M. Cardella (Eds.), Engineering in pre-college settings: Research into practice (pp. 35-60). Purdue University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt6wq7bh.7
Ngô Thị Liên (2024). Đề xuất khung năng lực giáo dục STEM của giáo viên tiểu học. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 24(21), 7-12. https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/2515
Nguyễn Chiến Thắng,Trần Lê Huyền,Trương Hùng Phương, Nguyễn Bùi Hậu (2024). Đề xuất khung năng lực giáo dục STEM của giáo viên tin học. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 24(19), 25-29. https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/2476
Nguyen, B., Hoang, P., Tran, Y., Nguyen, V., & Hoang, D. (2022). CDIO-based syllabus design in the context of teacher education. In Proceedings of the 18th International CDIO Conference (pp. 240-250). Worldwide CDIO Initiative.
Nguyen, N. T. P., & Tran, L. H. (2024). Uncovering the challenges and requirements of elementary school teachers in implementing STEM educational activities in Vietnam. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(6), 373-390. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.6.17
Nguyen, N. T., Thai, T. V., Pham, H. T., & Nguyen, G. C. T. (2020). CDIO approach in developing teacher training programs. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(18), 108-123. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i18.15517
Nguyen, T. H. N., Nguyen, T. P. N., Pham, T. H., & Truong, T. T. M. (2026). The use of the CDIO-STEM model to develop competencies among Vietnamese pre-service primary teachers. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 8(9), 2026581. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2026581
Nguyen, T. P. N. (2025). Proposal for STEM education competency framework for primary education university students according to CDIO approach. Vinh University Journal of Science: Educational Science and Technology, 54(2C), 72-82. https://doi.org/10.56824/vujs.2025c056c
O’Connor, S., Power, J., & Blom, N. (2023). A systematic review of CDIO Knowledge Library publications (2010-2020): An overview of trends and recommendations for future research. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/22054952.2023.2220265
Park, H., Byun, S., Sim, J., Han, H., & Baek, Y. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions and practices of STEAM education in Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(7), 1739-1753. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1531a
Pham, H. T., Nguyen, G. C. T., Nguyen, M. T., Nguyen, Q. A. T., & Che, L. H. (2021). The implementation of the CDIO approach in teacher training programs: The Vietnamese case. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 11(5), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2021-0109
Phan, T. H. (2024). Phát triển năng lực giáo dục STEM cho giáo viên tiểu học đáp ứng Chương trình giáo dục phổ thông 2018. Vinh University Journal of Science, 53(1C), 48-60. https://doi.org/10.56824/vujs.2023c09
Ramírez de Dampierre, M., Gaya-López, M. C., & Lara-Bercial, P. J. (2024). Evaluation of the implementation of project-based learning in engineering programs: A review of the literature. Education Sciences, 14, 1107. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14101107
Shernoff, D. J., Sinha, S., Bressler, D. M., & Ginsburg, L. (2017). Assessing teacher education and professional development for STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0068-1
Thibaut, L., Knipprath, H., Dehaene, W., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 02. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525
Thornhill-Miller, B., Camarda, A., Mercier, M., Burkhardt, J.-M., Morisseau, T., Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Vinchon, F., El Hayek, S., Augereau-Landais, M., Mourey, F., & Lubart, T. (2023). Creativity, critical thinking, communication, and collaboration: Assessment, certification, and promotion of 21st century skills for the future of work and education. Journal of Intelligence, 11(3), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11030054
Tien Ba Tran, Thu Phan Hung (2022). Development of CDIO-Based Programs from the Teacher Training Perspective. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(5), 204-219. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.5.11
Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299-321. https://doi.org/10. 1080/00220272.2012.668938
Yuan, X., Wan, J., An, D., Lu, J., & Yuan, P. (2024). Multi-method integrated experimental teaching reform of a programming course based on the OBE-CDIO model under the background of engineering education. Scientific Reports, 14, 16623. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-67667-6
Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes and student outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981-1015. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626801
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Bản quyền (c) 2026 Tạp chí Giáo dục
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .
