Thiết kế hoạt động dạy học vi mô trong lớp học song ngữ theo mô hình CLIL
Tóm tắt
In the context of educational innovation and the growing demand for developing foreign language competence as a tool for learning, bilingual education based on the Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) model has attracted increasing attention. However, requiring learners to simultaneously process academic content and use a foreign language may increase information-processing demands and affect learning effectiveness. On this basis, the present study aims to propose an approach to designing microteaching activities in bilingual classrooms. The study employed document analysis and synthesis combined with an instructional design approach to develop a pedagogical model and activity design process. The findings propose a design framework that organizes learning into short, clearly structured, and highly interactive learning units, thereby supporting learners in approaching academic content and using a foreign language step by step, enhancing learner engagement, and creating conditions for the simultaneous development of subject knowledge and language competence. The proposed design process was illustrated through the topic “The Water Cycle in Nature” (Grade 6 Natural Science), helping to clarify the potential application of the model in designing bilingual learning activities. The study contributes to strengthening the theoretical foundation for CLIL implementation while suggesting an instructional design approach that is appropriate for contemporary educational contexts.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Allen, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1969). Microteaching. Addison-Wesley.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.
Ball, P., Clegg, J., & Kelly, K. (2015). Putting CLIL into practice. Oxford University Press.
Cenoz, J. (2015). Content-based instruction and content and language integrated learning: The same or different? Language, Culture and Curriculum, 28(1), 8-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2014.1000922
Coyle, D. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543-562. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0
Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge University Press.
Cummins, J. (2008). BICS and CALP: Empirical and theoretical status of the distinction. In B. Street & N. H. Hornberger (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education (2nd ed., pp. 71-83). Springer.
Gabrielli, S., Kimani, S., & Catarci, T. (2006). The design of microlearning experiences: A research agenda. In T. Hug, M. Lindner, & P. A. Bruck (Eds.), Microlearning: Emerging concepts, practices and technologies after e-learning (pp. 45-53). Innsbruck University Press.
Giurgiu, L. (2017). Microlearning: An evolving elearning trend. Scientific Bulletin, 22(1), 18-23.
Hesse, A., Ospina, P. A., Wieland, M., Yepes, F. L., Nguyen, B., & Heuwieser, W. (2019). Short communication: Microlearning courses are effective at increasing the feelings of confidence and accuracy in the work of dairy personnel. Journal of Dairy Science, 102(10), 9505-9511. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2018-15927
Hug, T. (2005). Micro learning and narration: Exploring possibilities of utilization of narrations and storytelling for the designing of micro units and didactical micro-learning arrangements. In Proceedings of Media in Transition 4. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Kao, Y. T. (2023). Exploring translanguaging in Taiwanese CLIL classes: An analysis of teachers’ perceptions and practices. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 36(1), 100-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2022.2033762
Kim, H., & Graham, K. M. (2022). CLIL teachers’ needs and professional development: A systematic review. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 15(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.5294/laclil.2022.15.1.5
Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. Longman.
Leong, K., Sung, A., Au, D., & Blanchard, C. (2020). A review of the trend of microlearning. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 13(1), 88-102. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-10-2020-0044
Llinares, A., & McCabe, A. (2020). Systemic functional linguistics: The perfect match for content and language integrated learning. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 26(3), 245-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1635985
Lu, C., Gu, M. M., & Lee, J. C.-K. (2023). A systematic review of research on translanguaging in EMI and CLIL classrooms. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2023.2256775
Nguyen, H. T. M., Nguyen, H. T. T., Gao, X., Hoang, T. H., & Starfield, S. (2024). Developing professional capacity for content language integrated learning (CLIL) teaching in Vietnam: Tensions and responses. Language and Education, 38(1), 118-138. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2023.2260374
Nikou, S. A., & Economides, A. A. (2018). Mobile-based microlearning and assessment: Impact on learning performance and motivation of high school students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34(3), 269-278. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12240
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_1
Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. In J. P. Mestre & B. H. Ross (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 55, pp. 37-76). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8
van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Sweller, J. (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: Recent developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 17, 147-177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-005-3951-0
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Yin, J., Goh, T. T., Yang, B., & Xiaobin, Y. (2021). Conversation technology with micro-learning: The impact of chatbot-based learning on students’ learning motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(1), 154-177.
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Bản quyền (c) 2026 Tạp chí Giáo dục
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .









