Giải pháp lồng ghép bình đẳng giới trong đào tạo giáo viên STEM đáp ứng Chương trình Giáo dục phổ thông 2018
Tóm tắt
In the context of implementing the 2018 General Education Program and the need to promote gender equality in education, training STEM teachers capable of organizing equitable and inclusive teaching is becoming an urgent requirement in Vietnam. However, gender equality content in current STEM teacher training programs has not yet been systematically integrated. This study aims to analyze the theoretical basis of gender-sensitive STEM education, clarify the requirements for STEM teacher training, and propose solutions for integrating gender equality into teacher training institutions. The study uses a method of document analysis, synthesis, and comparison of educational policies, UNESCO and OECD documents, and international experiences on STEM teacher training that meet gender equality standards. The research results propose seven groups of solutions: integrating gender equality into learning outcomes; integrating it into training programs; developing the capacity of teacher trainers; innovating training methods; developing gender-sensitive STEM learning materials; innovating the assessment of STEM teacher competencies; and establishing a network to support female STEM professionals. These solutions support innovation in teacher training, promote gender equality in STEM education, and meet the requirements for developing high-quality human resources in the context of digital transformation.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bộ GD-ĐT (2018). Chương trình giáo dục phổ thông - Chương trình tổng thể. NXB Giáo dục Việt Nam.
Breda, T., Jouini, E., Napp, C., & Thebault, G. (2020). Gender stereotypes can explain the gender-equality paradox. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(49), 31063-31069. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2008704117
Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
European Commission (2024). Supporting teacher competence development for inclusive and equitable education. Publications Office of the European Union.
Herrmann, S. D., Adelman, R. M., Bodford, J. E., Graudejus, O., Okun, M. A., & Kwan, V. S. Y. (2016). The effects of a female role model on academic performance and persistence of women in STEM courses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 38(5), 258-268. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2016.1209757
Kerkhoven, A. H., Russo, P., Land-Zandstra, A. M., Saxena, A., & Rodenburg, F. J. (2016). Gender stereotypes in science education resources: A visual content analysis. PLOS ONE, 11(11), e0165037. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165037
Makarova, E., Aeschlimann, B., & Herzog, W. (2019, July). The gender gap in STEM fields: The impact of the gender stereotype of math and science on secondary students' career aspirations. In Frontiers in education (Vol. 4, p. 60). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00060
Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
Marginson, Simon, Tytler, Russell, Freeman, Brigid and Roberts, Kelly (2013), STEM: country comparisons: international comparisons of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education. Final report. Australian Council of Learned Academies, Melbourne, Vic. http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30059041
Master, A., Meltzoff, A. N., & Cheryan, S. (2024). Gender stereotypes and equity in STEM education: New evidence and implications for practice. Educational Research Review, 42, 100610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100610
OECD. (2024). Education at a glance 2024: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c00cad36-en
Shin, J. E. L., Levy, S. R., & London, B. (2016). Effects of role model exposure on STEM and non-STEM student engagement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(7), 410-427. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12371
Tan, A.-L. (2018). Journey of science teacher education in Singapore: past, present and future. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41029-017-0018-8
Thibaut, L., Ceuppens, S., De Loof, H., De Meester, J., Goovaerts, L., Struyf, A., Pauw, J. B., Dehaene, W., Deprez, J., De Cock, M., Hellinckx, L., Knipprath, H., Langie, G., Struyven, K., Van de Velde, D., Van Petegem, P., & Depaepe, F. (2018). Integrated STEM education: A systematic review of instructional practices in secondary education. European Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.20897/ejsteme/85525
Trust, T., Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016). “Together we are better”: Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & Education, 102, 15-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.06.007
UN Women (2024). Gender equality in education: Global progress and remaining challenges. United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women.
UNESCO (2017). Cracking the code: Girls’ and women’s education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000253479
UNESCO (2024). Global education monitoring report 2024: Gender equality and STEM education. UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO International Bureau of Education. (2017). A resource pack for gender-responsive STEM education. UNESCO International Bureau of Education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000250567
Unterhalter, E. (2024). Gender equality, education and social justice: Contemporary perspectives and challenges. International Journal of Educational Development, 104, 102941. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102941
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Bản quyền (c) 2026 Tạp chí Giáo dục
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .
