Tư duy mở chủ động của sinh viên các trường đại học ở Việt Nam: Một nghiên cứu định lượng
Tóm tắt
Actively open-minded thinking (AOT) is considered a cognitive disposition that enables students to adapt more effectively and make informed decisions in complex learning and social environments characterized by overwhelming amounts of information. This study was conducted to examine the status of this thinking style among Vietnamese university students. A questionnaire comprising 13 items was administered to a sample of 675 students. The analysis revealed that students’ AOT levels were only moderate (M = 2.89/5), with evident signs of cognitive conservatism and confirmation bias. No statistically significant differences in AOT were found across demographic and academic groups, including gender, university, year of study, major, and entrepreneurial experience. Based on these findings, the study recommends that universities integrate AOT development into academic programs, promote an open academic culture, and enhance students’ reflective experiences through practical and interdisciplinary learning opportunities.
Tài liệu tham khảo
An Le, D. T. B., & Hockey, J. (2022). Critical thinking in the higher education classroom: knowledge, power, control and identities. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 43(1), 140-158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.
2003182
Baron, J. (2005). Rationality and intelligence. Cambridge University Press.
Baron, J. (2019). Actively open-minded thinking in politics. Cognition, 188, 8-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.cognition.2018.10.004
Beckett, C., Eriksson, L., Johansson, E., & Wikström, C. (2018). Multivariate Data Analysis (MVDA). In W. S. Schlindwein & M. Gibson, Pharmaceutical Quality by Design (pp. 201-225). John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118895238.ch8
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2012). Research methods in education. In Professional Development in Education (6th ed., Vol. 38, Issue 3). Routledge.
Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25-42. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732
Mellers, B., Hertwig, R., & Kahneman, D. (2001). Do frequency representations eliminate conjunction effects? An exercise in adversarial collaboration. Psychological Science, 12(4), 269-275. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00350
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.cognition.2018.06.011
Stanovich, K. E., & Toplak, M. E. (2023). Actively open-minded thinking and its measurement. Journal of Intelligence, 11(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11020027
Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1997). Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 342-357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.342
Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M., & Lindeman, M. (2018). Actively open-minded thinking: Development of a shortened scale and disentangling attitudes towards knowledge and people. Thinking & Reasoning, 24(1), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2017.1378723
Tinh, N. T., Hung, D. M., Quy, V. Van, & Bach, N. T. (2024). Research on the Current Situation and Proposal of Some Basic Solutions to Develop Open- Minded Thinking for Medical Students in Hanoi City. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 9(3), 2528-2535. https://doi.org/10.38124/ijisrt/
IJISRT24MAR1826
Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2011). The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory & Cognition, 39(7), 1275-1289. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-011-0104-1
Tải xuống
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .
