Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến ý định và hành vi sử dụng hệ thống học tập thích ứng của sinh viên đại học: Tiếp cận mô hình UTAUT

Các tác giả

  • Lê Minh Thư Trường Đại học Đồng Tháp
  • Nguyễn Quốc Vũ Trường Đại học Đồng Tháp
  • Trần Văn Hưng Trường Đại học Sư phạm - Đại học Đà Nẵng

Tóm tắt

This study examines university students’ acceptance and use of adaptive learning systems and tests the original UTAUT path from facilitating conditions (FC) to actual use (USE). Data from 387 Vietnamese university students with direct experience of adaptive functions were analyzed using PLS-SEM and 5,000 bootstrap resamples. All five hypotheses were supported. Social influence was the strongest predictor of behavioral intention (BI) (β = 0.389), while BI (β = 0.611) and FC (β = 0.264) predicted USE. The model explained 68.6% of BI and 68.9% of USE; SRMR was 0.060. Discriminant validity was only partially supported because three HTMT values exceeded 0.85. The findings provide context-specific support for parallel BI→USE and FC→USE mechanisms and suggest that universities should combine pedagogical encouragement with infrastructure and technical support. Causal and predictive claims remain limited by the cross-sectional, self-reported design.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Bahari, M., Arpaci, I., Mohd Azmi, N. F., & Shuib, L. (2023). Predicting the intention to use learning analytics for academic advising in higher education. Sustainability, 15(21), Article 15190. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115190

Batucan, G. B., Gonzales, G. G., Balbuena, M. G., Pasaol, K. R. B., Seno, D. N., & Gonzales, R. R. (2022). An extended UTAUT model to explain factors affecting online learning system amidst COVID-19 pandemic: The case of a developing economy. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 5, Article 768831. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2022.768831

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295-336). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

du Plooy, E., Casteleijn, D., & Franzsen, D. (2024). Personalized adaptive learning in higher education: A scoping review of key characteristics and impact on academic performance and engagement. Heliyon, 10(21), Article e39630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39630

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). Sage.

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Mukred, M., Mokhtar, U. A., Hawash, B., AlSalman, H., & Zohaib, M. (2024). The adoption and use of learning analytics tools to improve decision making in higher learning institutions: An extension of technology acceptance model. Heliyon, 10(4), Article e26315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26315

Prasetyo, Y. T., Roque, R. A. C., Chuenyindee, T., Young, M. N., Diaz, J. F. T., Persada, S. F., Miraja, B. A., & Redi, A. A. N. P. (2021). Determining factors affecting the acceptance of medical education eLearning platforms during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines: UTAUT2 approach. Healthcare, 9(7), Article 780. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare9070780

Sobaih, A. E. E., Elshaer, I., & Hasanein, A. M. (2024). Examining students’ acceptance and use of ChatGPT in Saudi Arabian higher education. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 14(3), 709-721. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe14030047

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y. L., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, 36(1), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.2307/41410412

Wang, X., Maeda, Y., & Chang, H.-H. (2025). Development and techniques in learner model in adaptive e-learning system: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 225, Article 105184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105184

Xue, L., Mat Rashid, A., & Ouyang, S. (2024). The unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) in higher education: A systematic review. SAGE Open, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241229570

Zacharis, G., & Nikolopoulou, K. (2022). Factors predicting university students’ behavioral intention to use eLearning platforms in the post-pandemic normal: An UTAUT2 approach with “Learning Value”. Education and Information Technologies, 27(9), 12065-12082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11116-2

Tải xuống

Đã Xuất bản

20.10.2026

Cách trích dẫn

Lê Minh Thư, L. M. T., Nguyễn Quốc Vũ, & Trần Văn Hưng. (2026). Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến ý định và hành vi sử dụng hệ thống học tập thích ứng của sinh viên đại học: Tiếp cận mô hình UTAUT. Tạp Chí Giáo dục, 26(20), 84–91. Truy vấn từ https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/6596

Số

Chuyên mục

Các bài báo