Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến hoạt động tư vấn tâm lí học đường ở trường phổ thông tại tỉnh Nghệ An
Tóm tắt
In the context of the growing demand for school psychological counseling in general education institutions, this study examines the factors influencing school counseling activities in Nghe An province. Adopting an ecological perspective and a comprehensive school counseling approach, the study develops and tests a model comprising six factors using structural equation modeling (SEM). The results indicate that the model demonstrates a high level of goodness of fit and that all measurement scales exhibit satisfactory reliability. Among the examined factors, the quality and professional competence of counseling staff exert the strongest influence on school counseling activities,followed by cultural, communication, and technological factors as well as policy and management mechanisms, whereas students’ psychological difficulties related to learning and career orientation show a negative effect. These findings provide important empirical evidence to inform management strategies and enhance the effectiveness of school psychological counseling in Nghe An province.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
Bộ GD-ĐT (2017). Thông tư số 31/2017/TT-BGDĐT ngày 18/12/2017 về việc hướng dẫn thực hiện công tác tư vấn tâm lí cho học sinh trong trường phổ thông.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Sage.
Collier, J. E. (2020). Applied structural equation modeling using AMOS: Basic to advanced techniques. Routledge.
Gysbers, N. C., & Henderson, P. (2012). Developing and managing your school guidance and counseling program (5th ed.). American Counseling Association.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (5th ed.). Guilford Press.
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K. T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(3), 320-341. https://doi.org/10.1207/
s15328007sem1103_2
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill.
OECD. (2017). Students’ well-being: PISA 2015 results (Volume III). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/
-en
Super, D. E. (1990). A life‐span, life‐space approach to career development. In D. Brown & L. Brooks (Eds.), Career choice and development (2nd ed., pp. 197-261). Jossey-Bass.
Tải xuống
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .
