Động cơ nghiên cứu khoa học của sinh viên tại Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh: Giá trị dự báo của niềm tin năng lực nghiên cứu và tư duy mở chủ động
Tóm tắt
In the context of higher education increasingly emphasizing the development of research competencies, understanding students’ motivations for scientific research is crucial for enhancing the quality of both education and research. This study described university students’ scientific research (SR) motivation and examined the predictive value of research self-efficacy and actively open-minded thinking for each motivational component. A quantitative, cross-sectional survey was conducted with 410 conveniently sampled students from six disciplinary fields in Ho Chi Minh City; data were analysed using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis, repeated-measures ANOVA, t-tests, ANOVA, Pearson correlation and multiple regression. SR motivation was confirmed as a three-component construct with a clear hierarchy: intrinsic motivation (M = 3.74) exceeded extrinsic motivation (M = 3.66) and failure avoidance (M = 3.29). Research self-efficacy positively predicted intrinsic (β = 0.573) and extrinsic (β = 0.465) motivation but not failure avoidance, whereas actively open-minded thinking negatively predicted failure avoidance (β = -0.346) only. The study provides evidence that approach and avoidance motivation in student research operate as two relatively independent systems governed by different psychological factors, together with the first quantitative data on the failure-avoidance dimension among Vietnamese students.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ban Chấp hành Trung ương (2024). Nghị quyết số 57-NQ/TW ngày 22/12/2024 của Bộ Chính trị về đột phá phát triển khoa học, công nghệ, đổi mới sáng tạo và chuyển đổi số quốc gia.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
Bonafé-Pontes, A., Bastos, R. C., & Pilati, R. (2025). Actively Open-Minded Thinking About Evidence (AOT-E) Scale: Adaptation and evidence of validity in a Brazilian sample. Judgment and Decision Making, 20, e3. https://doi.org/10.1017/jdm.2024.37
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185-216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
Büyüköztürk, Ş., Atalay, K., Sozgun, Z., & Kebapçı, Ş. (2011). The development of research self-efficacy scale. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 6(1), 22-29.
Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980-1008. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035661
Chemers, M. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Syed, M., Goza, B. K., & Bearman, S. (2011). The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 469-491. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2011.01710.x
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587
Deemer, E. D., Martens, M. P., & Buboltz, W. C. (2010). Toward a tripartite model of research motivation: Development and initial validation of the Research Motivation Scale. Journal of Career Assessment, 18(3), 292-309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072710364794
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2020). From expectancy-value theory to situated expectancy-value theory: A developmental, social cognitive, and sociocultural perspective on motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101859. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101859
Esteban, R. F. C., Mamani-Benito, O., Huancahuire-Vega, S., & Lingan, S. K. (2022). Design and validation of a Research Motivation Scale for Peruvian university students (MoINV-U). Frontiers in Education, 7, 791102. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.791102
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Hà Đức Sơn, Nông Thị Như Mai (2019). Các nhân tố ảnh hưởng đến sự tham gia nghiên cứu khoa học của sinh viên - Nghiên cứu trường hợp Đại học Tài chính - Marketing. Tạp chí Nghiên cứu Tài chính - Marketing, 49, 13-24. https://doi.org/10.52932/jfm.vi49.92
Haran, U., Ritov, I., & Mellers, B. A. (2013). The role of actively open-minded thinking in information acquisition, accuracy, and calibration. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(3), 188-201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500005921
Howard, J. L., Bureau, J., Guay, F., Chong, J. X. Y., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Student motivation and associated outcomes: A meta-analysis from self-determination theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1300-1323. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966789
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Janssen, E. M., Verkoeijen, P. P. J. L., Heijltjes, A. E. G., Mainhard, T., van Peppen, L. M., & van Gog, T. (2020). Psychometric properties of the Actively Open-minded Thinking scale. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100659
Jones, E. A., Piontek, J., Walden, L. C., & Harrell-Williams, L. M. (2024). Development and validation of the Sources of Research Self-Efficacy Scale. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 42(1), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/07342829231204507
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
Lê Thị Thương, Nguyễn Ngọc Lân (2024). Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến sự tham gia nghiên cứu khoa học của sinh viên Trường Đại học Hà Nội. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 24(14), 47-52. https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/2064
Lopatto, D. (2007). Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 6(4), 297-306. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-06-0039
Nguyễn Văn Bắc (2011). Động cơ nghiên cứu khoa học của sinh viên Đại học Huế. Luận án tiến sĩ Tâm lí học, Viện Khoa học Giáo dục Việt Nam.
Robnett, R. D., Chemers, M. M., & Zurbriggen, E. L. (2015). Longitudinal associations among undergraduates’ research experience, self-efficacy, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(6), 847-867. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21221
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
Sadler, T. D., Burgin, S., McKinney, L., & Ponjuan, L. (2010). Learning science through research apprenticeships: A critical review of the literature. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(3), 235-256. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20326
Stanovich, K. E., & Toplak, M. E. (2023). Actively open-minded thinking and its measurement. Journal of Intelligence, 11(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence11020027
Võ Thị Minh Nho (2023). Nghiên cứu về những yếu tố ảnh hưởng lên động cơ tham gia nghiên cứu khoa học của sinh viên. Tạp chí Khoa học và Công nghệ, Đại học Đà Nẵng, 21(4), 27-33.
Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science, 331(6023), 1447-1451. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1198364
Yusuf, M. (2011). The impact of self-efficacy, achievement motivation, and self-regulated learning strategies on students’ academic achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2623-2626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.158
Tải xuống
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Bản quyền (c) 2026 Tạp chí Giáo dục
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .
