Tự đánh giá tính liên kết và tính mạch lạc trong đoạn văn nghị luận tiếng Anh của sinh viên năm thứ hai chuyên ngành Ngôn ngữ Anh: Một nghiên cứu tại Trường Đại học Công nghiệp Hà Nội

Các tác giả

  • Phạm Phúc Thành Trường Đại học Công nghiệp Hà Nội
  • Phạm Thị Thanh Vân Đại học Bách khoa Hà Nội

Tóm tắt

Cohesion and coherence are two important components that contribute to clear and convincing argumentative essays. However, Vietnamese students majoring in English language often encounter difficulties in organizing ideas and using cohesive devices effectively. The study employs questionnaires to investigate how second-year English majors at a university in Vietnam selfassess the cohesion and coherence of their English argumentative paragraphs. The results indicate that the students have difficulty explaining and evaluating the cohesion and coherence in their English writing. The study contributes to providing practical evidence on students' awareness and self-assessment ability, and suggests directions for improving writing teaching activities to enhance the quality of training coherence and coherence in English argumentative paragraphs.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Andrade, H. L., & Brown, G. T. (2016). Student self-assessment in the classroom. In Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 319-334). Routledge.

Bitchener, J., & Basturkmen, H. (2006). Perceptions of the difficulties of postgraduate L2 thesis students writing the discussion section. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5(1), 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2005.10.002

Botunac, S., & Perinčić Tičić, N. (2020). Cohesion and coherence challenges in argumentative essay writing with secondary school students. Zbornik radova Veleučilišta u Šibeniku, 14(3-4), 147-155.

Brostoff, A. (1981). Coherence: “Next to” is not “connected to”. College Composition & Communication, 32(3), 278-294. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc198115898

Brown, G. T., Andrade, H. L., & Chen, F. (2015). Accuracy in student self-assessment: Directions and cautions for research. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(4), 444-457.

Connor, U. (1984). A study of cohesion and coherence in English as a second language students’ writing. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 17(3), 301-316. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351818409389208

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications.

Chappuis, S., & Stiggins, R. J. (2002). Classroom assessment for learning. Educational Leadership, 60(1), 40-44.

Dang, T. H., Chau, T. H., & Tra, T. Q. (2020). A study on the difficulties in writing argumentative essays of English-majored sophomores at Tay Do University, Vietnam. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(1), 201-240. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v6i1.3389

Fahy, P. J. (2013). Uses of published research: An exploratory case study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(1), 145-166. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i1.1382

Halliday, M. A., & Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford University Press.

Halliday, M., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English (1st Edition). Longman.

Hoey, M. (2013). Textual interaction: An introduction to written discourse analysis. Routledge.

Hughes, R. E., & Duhamel, P. A. (1967). Rhetoric: Principles and usage. Prentice-Hall.

Hyland, K. (2009). Academic discourse. Continuum.

Lee, S., & Schmidgall, J. (2020). The Importance of English Writing Skills in the International Workplace. Research Memorandum. ETS RM-20-07. Educational Testing Service.

Lybbert, E., & Cummings, D. (1969). On repetition and coherence. College Composition & Communication, 20(1), 35-38. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc196920217

McMillan, J. (2018). Classroom Assessment: Principles and Practice that Enhance Student Learning and Motivation. Pearson/Allyn & Bacon, Inc.

Ozfidan, B., & Mitchell, C. (2020). Detected difficulties in argumentative writing. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 15-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/382

Saprina, C. M., Rosyid, A., & Suryanti, Y. (2021). Difficulties in developing idea encountered by students in writing argumentative essay. Journal of English Teaching and Linguistics Studies, 3(1), 48-54.

Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge University Press.

Youn-Hee, K. (2019). Developing and validating empirically-derived diagnostic descriptors in ESL academic writing. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(3), 906-926. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2019.16.3.9.906

Đã Xuất bản

14.01.2026

Cách trích dẫn

Phạm, P. T., & Phạm, T. T. V. (2026). Tự đánh giá tính liên kết và tính mạch lạc trong đoạn văn nghị luận tiếng Anh của sinh viên năm thứ hai chuyên ngành Ngôn ngữ Anh: Một nghiên cứu tại Trường Đại học Công nghiệp Hà Nội. Tạp Chí Giáo dục, 25(đặc biệt 10), 385–391. Truy vấn từ https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/4562

Số

Chuyên mục

Các bài báo