Ảnh hưởng của trí tuệ nhân tạo tạo sinh đến tư duy phản biện của học sinh trung học phổ thông: Nghiên cứu tại các trường trực thuộc Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội
Tóm tắt
In the context of the increasingly widespread use of GenAI in learning, the key issue is not only how frequently students use this tool, but also how they use it. This article examines the relationship between four groups of GenAI use behaviors - frequency of use, level of dependence, learning-support use, and information verification - and the critical thinking of 185 high school students at schools affiliated with Vietnam National University, Hanoi. The data were analyzed using PLS-SEM. The findings show that using GenAI to support learning and verify information is positively associated with several components of critical thinking; conversely, dependence on GenAI is negatively associated with critical thinking skills and dispositions. Frequency of use has no statistically significant relationship with the knowledge component. These findings suggest that the educational value of GenAI depends primarily on the quality of use and learners’ ability to control the tool.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Bùi Lan Hương (2023). Phát triển năng lực tư duy phản biện cho học sinh trung học phổ thông trong quá trình thực hiện Chương trình giáo dục phổ thông 2018. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 23(14), 29-34. https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/824
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlette, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., ... Wright, R. (2023). Opinion paper: “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction (The Delphi Report). California Academic Press.
Guo, Y., & Wang, Y. (2025). Exploring the effects of artificial intelligence application on EFL students’ academic engagement and emotional experiences: A mixed-methods study. European Journal of Education, 60(1), e12812. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12812
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Helal, M. Y. I., Elgendy, I. A., Albashrawi, M. A., Dwivedi, Y. K., Al-Ahmadi, M. S., & Jeon, I. (2025). The impact of generative AI on critical thinking skills: A systematic review, conceptual framework and future research directions. Information Discovery and Delivery. https://doi.org/10.1108/IDD-05-2025-0125
Hou, I., Nguyen, H. V., Man, O., & MacNeil, S. (2024). The evolving usage of GenAI by computing students. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.16453
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., ... Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kock, N. (2015). Common method bias in PLS-SEM: A full collinearity assessment approach. International Journal of e-Collaboration, 11(4), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijec.2015100101
Lau, G. R., Low, W. Y., Tay, L., Guevarra, Y., Gašević, D., & Hartanto, A. (2025). Understanding critical thinking in generative artificial intelligence use: Development, validation, and correlates of the Critical Thinking in AI Use Scale. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.12413
Nguyễn Hải Thanh, Nguyễn Thị Hiền (2021). Rèn luyện tư duy phản biện cho học sinh trung học phổ thông đáp ứng yêu cầu đổi mới giáo dục. Tạp chí Khoa học, Trường Đại học Sư phạm Hà Nội, 66(1), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.18173/2354-1075.2021-0005
Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). ChatGPT: Bullshit spewer or the end of traditional assessments in higher education? Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 342-363. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.9
Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learning Environments, 10, Article 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Bản quyền (c) 2026 Tạp chí Giáo dục
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .









