Mô hình dạy học trong giáo dục đại học: Tổng quan lí luận và hàm ý đối với Việt Nam
Tóm tắt
In the context of higher education reform and digital transformation, examining teaching models is essential for informing instructional innovation in Vietnamese universities. This paper employs a literature review approach to synthesize the theoretical foundations of teaching models in higher education and derive implications for the Vietnamese context. The reviewed sources include peer-reviewed journal articles, academic books, and national and international policy documents related to higher education teaching models. The literature was selected based on topical relevance, academic quality, and full-text accessibility. The 27 selected documents were analyzed through thematic coding and qualitative content synthesis. The review identifies several teaching models frequently discussed in the literature, including traditional teaching, blended learning, flipped classroom, project-based learning, and problem-based learning. The findings also indicate a shift from knowledge transmission toward learner-centered approaches, greater integration of digital technologies, and competency-based education. Based on the synthesized evidence, the paper discusses key conditions and challenges associated with implementing these teaching models in Vietnamese higher education. It further proposes implications for enhancing digital pedagogical competencies of faculty members, strengthening technological infrastructure, developing digital learning resources, and reforming assessment practices to align with competency-based education.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Al-Mekhlafi, A. G., Zaneldin, E., Ahmed, W., Kazim, H. Y., & Jadhav, M. D. (2025). The effectiveness of using blended learning in higher education: Students’ perception. Cogent Education, 12(1), Article 2455228. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2455228
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, Article 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x
Bond, M., Buntins, K., Bedenlier, S., Zawacki-Richter, O., & Kerres, M. (2020). Mapping research in student engagement and educational technology in higher education: A systematic evidence map. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0176-8
Drugova, E., Zhuravleva, I., Zakharova, U., & Latipov, A. (2024). Learning analytics driven improvements in learning design in higher education: A systematic literature review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(2), 510-524. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12894
Garrison, D. R., & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001
Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. J. Bonk & C. R. Graham (Eds.), The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs (pp. 3-21). Pfeiffer.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2015). Models of teaching (9th ed.). Pearson.
Khor, E. T., & Mutthulakshmi, K. (2024). A systematic review of the role of learning analytics in supporting personalized learning. Education Sciences, 14(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010051
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733
Le, H. D., & Le, T. C. (2021). Pivotal roles of teachers and students in enhancing an active learning environment. Ho Chi Minh City Open University Journal of Science - Social Sciences, 11(2), 18-37. https://doi.org/10.46223/HCMCOUJS.soci.en.11.2.1985.2021
Le, T. N., Allen, B., & Johnson, N. F. (2022). Blended learning: Barriers and drawbacks for English language lecturers at Vietnamese universities. E-Learning and Digital Media, 19(2), 225-239. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530211048235
Le, V. T., & Ho, H. T. (2021). Integrating project-based learning into English for specific purposes classes at tertiary level: Perceived challenges and benefits. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 37(4), 128-148. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4642
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education, 115(3), 1-47.
Nguyễn Văn Cường, Bernd Meier (2014). Lí luận dạy học hiện đại: Cơ sở đổi mới mục tiêu, nội dung và phương pháp dạy học. NXB Đại học Sư phạm.
Nguyen, T. M. T. (2018). Using problem-based learning to promote students’ use of higher-order thinking skills and facilitate their learning. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 34(2), 90-110. https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4249
Nguyen, T. T. (2021). The implementation of flipped classroom approach in an academic English course. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.25073/2525-2445/vnufs.4649
Nguyen, T. T. (2025). Evaluation of a project-based learning model in EFL learning at tertiary level: Undergraduates’ voices. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 41(3), 157-169. https://doi.org/10.63023/2525-2445/jfs.ulis.5518
Nguyen, T. T. M. (2024). Learners’ attitudes towards blended learning at Nguyen Tat Thanh University. Journal of Science and Technology, 7(4), 144-150. https://doi.org/10.55401/5nrm6q71
OECD (2023). OECD digital education outlook 2023: Towards an effective digital education ecosystem. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/c74f03de-en
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Strelan, P., Osborn, A., & Palmer, E. (2020). The flipped classroom: A meta-analysis of effects on student performance across disciplines and education levels. Educational Research Review, 30, Article 100314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100314
Thủ tướng Chính phủ (2022). Quyết định số 131/QĐ-TTg ngày 25/01/2022 phê duyệt Đề án “Tăng cường ứng dụng công nghệ thông tin và chuyển đổi số trong giáo dục và đào tạo giai đoạn 2022-2025, định hướng đến năm 2030”.
Thủ tướng Chính phủ (2024). Quyết định số 1705/QĐ-TTg ngày 31/12/2024 phê duyệt Chiến lược phát triển giáo dục đến năm 2030, tầm nhìn đến năm 2045.
Trần Thị Thanh Hà, Phùng Trần Gia Bảo (2025). Mức độ sẵn sàng học tập tự định hướng của sinh viên trong môi trường Blended Learning: Trường hợp nghiên cứu tại Đại học Bách khoa Hà Nội. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 25(15), 47-52. https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/3710
Trinh, N. M. T., & Trinh, N. B. (2023). Undergraduates’ Perceptions of Online Assessment in Tertiary Education: A Case Study at Tra Vinh University, Vietnam. Vietnam Journal of Education, 7(3), 357-364. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2023.340
Vu Thi Mai Huong, Nguyen Thi Thanh Tung, & Tieu Thi My Hong (2023). Teaching and learning in large classes at universities during the Covid-19 pandemic: A view of Vietnamese students. International Journal of Instruction, 16(3), 307-324. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.16317a
Tải xuống
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Bản quyền (c) 2026 Tạp chí Giáo dục
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .









