Nhận thức của sinh viên năm thứ nhất Khoa Tiếng Anh, Trường Đại học Mở Hà Nội về phản hồi sửa lỗi trực tiếp và gián tiếp trong kĩ năng viết học thuật

Các tác giả

  • Trần Thị Bạch Tuyết Học viên cao học khóa 2021-2023, Trường Đại học Hà Nội
  • Ngô Văn Giang Trường Đại học Hà Nội

Tóm tắt

At the tertiary level, academic writing is an important skill for students. During the process of practicing academic writing, students crave support from instructors through corrective feedback. This research aims to explore first-year Hanoi Open University students' perceptions of written corrective feedback in the context of academic writing, investigating its effectiveness and the preferred types of feedback. The analysis of the collected data revealed positive perceptions of written corrective feedback among the freshmen. The results indicated that those students perceived both direct and indirect feedback to be effective in improving their academic writing skills. However, variations in the students’ preferences for different types of feedback were observed. The research suggests that teachers use a combination of two feedback types, leveraging their strengths for different errors, and includes other recommendations for future research.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Al-Jarrah, R. S. (2016). A suggested model of corrective feedback provision. Ampersand, 3(2), 98-107.

Amrhein, H. R., & Nassaji, H. (2012). Written Corrective Feedback: What do Students and Teachers Think is Right and Why? Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 95-127.

Banat, M. I, Jomaa, N. J., & Shabdin, A. A. (2019). EFL Postgraduate Students' Perspectives towards Teachers' Feedback on L2 Writing. Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 9(2), 537-555.

Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17(2), 102-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004

Ellis, R. (2008). A typology of written corrective feedback types. ELT Journal, 63(2), 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1093/ elt/ccn023

Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Hogue, A. (2007). First steps in academic writing (2nd ed.). Longman.

Hyland, F. (2012). Does error feedback help student writers? New evidence on the short- and long-term effects of written error correction. In Feedback in Second Language Writing (pp. 81-104). Cambridge University Press.

Kruse, O. (2003). Getting Started: Academic Writing in the First Year of a University Education. In Teaching Academic Writing in European Higher Education (pp. 19-28). Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48195-2_2

Lee, I. (2019). Teacher written corrective feedback: Less is more. Language Teaching, 52(4), 524-536.

Qasim, H. S. (2011). The perceptions and practices of first year students' academic writing at the Colleges of Applied Sciences in Oman [Doctoral dissertation]. https://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/2390/

Soe, T. (2022). Corrective Feedback in Language Teaching. Journal of International Cultural Studies, 28, 155-162.

Storch, N. (2018). Written corrective feedback from sociocultural theoretical perspectives: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 51(2), 262-277.

Tải xuống

Đã Xuất bản

20.06.2024

Cách trích dẫn

Trần, T. B. T., & Ngô, V. G. (2024). Nhận thức của sinh viên năm thứ nhất Khoa Tiếng Anh, Trường Đại học Mở Hà Nội về phản hồi sửa lỗi trực tiếp và gián tiếp trong kĩ năng viết học thuật. Tạp Chí Giáo dục, 24(12), 47–52. Truy vấn từ https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/2006

Số

Chuyên mục

Các bài báo