Xây dựng bộ công cụ đánh giá mức độ ảnh hưởng của xếp hạng đại học đến hoạt động nghiên cứu khoa học của giảng viên

Các tác giả

  • Đỗ Thị Hoài Vân Trường Đại học Công nghệ Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh

Tóm tắt

In recent years, university rankings have emerged as a growing trend. From another perspective, it has become a tool to ensure the quality of higher education. Vietnam has a number of higher education institutions listed in prestigious world university rankings such as THE, QS, ARWU. This article aims to develop and define a questionnaire to assess the impact of university rankings on scientific research activities of lecturers at higher education institutions in Vietnam. The questionnaire was developed using qualitative methods through expert interviews, document analysis and the reliability of the scale was assessed by EFA factor analysis and Cronbach's Alpha coefficient with a sample of 117 staff and lecturers of higher education institutions. The results have built and standardized the scale of the questionnaire surveying the opinions of staff and lecturers on the impact of university rankings on scientific research activities of lecturers at higher education institutions in Vietnam. This study is a useful reference for further studies in proposing solutions in university ranking activities, contributing to promoting lecturers' research activities.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociological Methods & Research, 17(3), 303-316.

Burchett, S., Collins, A. B., & Collins, D. L. (2001). Intra-institutional that influence accounting research productivity. The Journal of Applied Business Research, 17(2), 17-31.

Chen, Y., Gupta, A., & Hoshower, L. (2006). Factors that motivate business faculty to conduct research: An expectancy theory analysis. Journal of Education for Business, 81, 179-189. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEB.81.4.179-189

Deming, D. J., & Figlio, D. (2016). Accountability in US education: Applying lessons from K-12 experience to higher education. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 33-56. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.3.33

Deming, D. J., & Figlio, D. (2016). Accountability in US education: Applying lessons from K–12 experience to higher education. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(3), 33-56. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.30.3.33

Ding, W.W., Muray, F., & Stuarrt, T.E. (2006). Gender differences in patenting in the academic life sciences. Science, 313(5787), 665-667. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1124832

Đỗ Thị Hoài Vân, Lê Huy Tùng (2022). Xác định các nhân tố ảnh hưởng đến năng lực nghiên cứu khoa học của giảng viên Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 22(13), 51-57.

Hazelkorn, E. (2014). World-class Universities or World-class systems? Rankings and Higher Education Policy Choices. In Hazelkorn, E., Wells, P., Marope, M. (Eds), Rankings and accountability in higher education: Uses and misuses. UNESCO.

Komotar, M. H. (2021). Global university rankings in European higher education policy and practice: Institutional and national responses from Slovenia and the Netherlands. In University-Industry Collaboration Strategies in the Digital Era (pp. 62-83). IGI Global.

Millot, B. (2015). International rankings: Universities vs. higher education systems. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 156-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.10.004

Nguyễn Đình Thọ (2011). Phương pháp nghiên cứu khoa học trong kinh doanh: Thiết kế và thực hiện. NXB Lao động - Xã hội.

Quốc hội (2018). Luật sửa đổi, bổ sung một số điều của Luật Giáo dục đại học. Luật số 34/2018/QH14, ban hành ngày 19/11/2018.

Rauhvargers, A. (2013). Global university rankings and their impact: Report II (pp. 21-23). Brussels: European University Association.

Raykov, T., & Widaman, K. F. (1995). Issues in applied structural equation modeling research. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 2(4), 289-318. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519509540017

Ruel, E., Wagner III, W. E., & Gillespie, B. J. (2015). The practice of survey research: Theory and applications. Sage Publications.

Zhang, X. (2014). Factors that motivate academic staff to conduct research and influence research productivity in Chinese project 211 universities. Doctoral dissertation, University of Canberra.

Tải xuống

Đã Xuất bản

05.11.2024

Cách trích dẫn

Đỗ, T. H. V. (2024). Xây dựng bộ công cụ đánh giá mức độ ảnh hưởng của xếp hạng đại học đến hoạt động nghiên cứu khoa học của giảng viên. Tạp Chí Giáo dục, 24(21), 19–24. Truy vấn từ https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/2518

Số

Chuyên mục

Các bài báo