Đánh giá kết quả học tập trong xu thế chuyển đổi số giáo dục đại học: Một nghiên cứu tổng quan
Tóm tắt
Digital transformation has comprehensively transformed school activities from goals, content, management methods and organization of the teaching and learning process to the relationships and roles of stakeholders in teaching and learning activities. Assessment is placed at the heart of the teaching and learning process, as the way learners are assessed would help shape their competences and determine their ability to progress. The research results underscore that the trend of learning assessment is shifting towards diversifying assessment methods and increasing learners' participation in the assessment process amidst the digital transformation of higher education, thereby highlighting issues for considerations for higher education institutions. It is essential that higher education institutions acknowledge the need for major changes in assessing learning outcomes, especially in the context of strong digital transformation, to adapt, thereby contributing to improving the quality of education and training.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., Dollinger, M., Dawson, P., Boud, D., & Bearman, M. (2023). From authentic assessment to authenticity in assessment: Broadening perspectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(4), 499-510. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2271193
Anh, H., & Kha, P. V. (2023). Business process management and digital transformation in higher education - Lessons learned from Hanoi University of Industry. Vietnam Journal of Educational Sciences, C1(1), 254-263.
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2015). Formative assessment - An optimistic but incomplete vision. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2014.999643
Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2015). Rethinking assessment in higher education: Learning for the longer term. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315692913
Brown, M. (2017). Evaluating technology to prevent academic integrity violations in online assessments. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 20(1). https://www.ojdla.com/archive/spring211/brown211.pdf
Bùi Thị Ngọc Linh, Khưu Thuận Vũ, Lê Thị Lành, Châu Minh Hùng (2022). Đánh giá năng lực người học và một số vấn đề cần lưu ý khi vận dụng tại trường đại học Quy Nhơn, Tạp chí Khoa học, Trường Đại học Sư phạm Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, 19(5), 769-782. http://dx.doi.org/10.54607/hcmue.js.19.5.3366(2022)
Bulut, O., Beiting-Parrish, M., Casabianca, J. M., Slater, S. C., Jiao, H., Song, D.,... & Morilova, P. (2024). The rise of artificial intelligence in educational measurement: Opportunities and ethical challenges. Chinese/English Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation, 5(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.59863/MIQL7785
Capocci, O., O'Leary, M., & Costello, E. (2022). Towards a framework to support the implementation of digital formative assessment in higher education. Research in Learning Technology, 30. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v30.2712
Cochrane, T. (2020). A guide to designing authentic online collaboration. Melbourne CSHE Teaching and Learning Short Guide Series, University of Melbourne.
Cumhur, F., & Çam, S. S. (2021). Research Article Digital transformation in assessment and evaluation course: The effects of Web 2.0 tools. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(3), 15-39. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021370559
Dawson, P. (2020). Defending assessment security in a digital world: Preventing e-cheating and supporting academic integrity in higher education. Routledge.
Dochy, F., Segers, M., Gijbels, D., & Struyven, K. (2018). Assessment engineering: Breaking down barriers between teaching and assessment. In F. Dochy, M. Segers, D. Gijbels, & K. Struyven (Eds.), Assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 1-17). Routledge.
Fawzi, H. (2018). Using technology for formative assessment to improve students' learning. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 14(1), 232-246. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1176157.pdf
Gikandi, J. W., & Morrow, D. (2016). Formative assessment in higher education: A critical review of the literature. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 41(7), 1010-1026.
Groeneveld, W., Vennekens, J., & Aerts, K. (2020). Engaging software engineering students in grading: The effects of peer assessment on self-evaluation, motivation, and study time. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2012.03521
Heil, C., & Ifenthaler, D. (2023). Online assessment in higher education: A systematic review. Online Learning Journal, 27(1), 1-20. https://olj.onlinelearningconsortium.org/index.php/olj/article/view/3398
Holden, O. L., Norris, M. E., & Kuhlmeier, V. A. (2021). Academic integrity in online assessment: A research review. Frontiers in Education, 6, 639814. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.639814
Hurix (2025). Formative assessment: Shaping higher education's future. Hurix Digital. https://www.hurix.com/blogs/the-role-of-data-analytics-formative-assessments-in-shaping-the-future-of-higher-education/
Inspera (2024). Authentic assessment online: The benefits, challenges, and examples. Inspera. https://www.inspera.com/online-assessments/authentic-assessment-benefits-challenges-examples/
Ismail, S. M., Rahul, D. R., Patra, I., & Rezvani, E. (2022). Formative vs. summative assessment: Impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self-regulation skill. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), 40.
JISC (2017). Effective assessment in a digital age: A guide to technology-enhanced assessment and feedback. London, UK.
JISC (2020). The future of assessment: Five principles, five targets for 2025. London, UK.
Jurāne-Brēmane, A. (2021). The digital transformation of assessment: Challenges and opportunities. In Human, Technologies and Quality of Education (pp. 352-363). University of Latvia Press. https://doi.org/10.22364/ htqe.2021.25
Mahlberg, J. (2022). Formative assessment helps students learn over time. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 12(1), 45-60.
McGuire, R. (2022). Using formative assessment in supporting student-directed learning. Every Learner Everywhere. https://www.everylearnereverywhere.org/blog/using-formative-assessment-in-supporting-student-directed-learning/
Messier, N. (2022). Authentic assessments. Center for the Advancement of Teaching Excellence, University of Illinois Chicago.
Nhi, N. (2023). What is authentic assessment? A full guide for educators. FeedbackFruits. https://feedbackfruits.com/ blog/what-is-authentic-assessment-a-full-guide-for-educators
Novak, M., & Kermek, D. (2024). Assessment automation of complex student programming assignments. Education Sciences, 14(1), 54. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14010054
OECD (2020). Learning remotely when schools close: How well are students and schools prepared? Insights from PISA. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/3bfda1f7-en
Perkins, M., Furze, L., Roe, J., & MacVaugh, J. (2023). The AI Assessment Scale (AIAS): A framework for ethical integration of generative AI in educational assessment. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2012.03521
Sabrina, F., Azad, S., Sohail, S., & Thakur, S. (2022). Ensuring academic integrity in online assessments: A literature review and recommendations. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(1), 60-66. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.1.1587
Sajja, R., Sermet, Y., Cikmaz, M., Cwiertny, D., & Demir, I. (2023). Artificial intelligence-enabled intelligent assistant for personalized and adaptive learning in higher education. Information, 15(10), 596. https://www.mdpi.com/2078-2489/15/10/596
Sangwin, C., & Köcher, N. (2015). Automation of mathematics examinations. Computers & Education, 94, 215-227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.014
Singh, V. V. (2021). Advantages and downsides of authentic assessments. LinkedIn. https://www.linkedin.com/ pulse/advantages-downsides-authentic-assessments-vijay-vardhan-singh
Son, N. T. K., Huong, B. T. T., Tho, C. C., Anh, P. T., Tri, N. Q. (2021). The applications of machine learning in education science research. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 37(4), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.25073/ 2588-1159/vnuer.4562
Tai, J., Ajjawi, R., Bearman, M., Boud, D., Dawson, P., & Jorre de St Jorre, T. (2022). Assessment for inclusion: Rethinking contemporary strategies in assessment design. Higher Education Research & Development, 41(6), 1234-1248. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2057451
Thủ tướng Chính phủ (2020). Quyết định số 749/QĐ-TTg ngày 03/6/2020 phê duyệt “Chương trình Chuyển đổi số quốc gia đến năm 2025, định hướng đến năm 2030”.
Togni, J. (2025). Development of an inclusive educational platform using open technologies and machine learning: A case study on accessibility enhancement. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.15501
Traoré, I., Nakkabi, Y., Saad, S., & Sayed, B. (2017). Ensuring online exam integrity through continuous biometric authentication. In Information Security Practices (pp. 73-81). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48947-6_6
UNESCO (2021). Digital learning and transformation of assessment systems. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380132
Yang, C., & Taele, P. (2025). AI for accessible education: Personalized audio-based learning for blind students. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2504.17117
Zafar, M. B., Valera, I., Gomez Rodriguez, M., & Gummadi, K. P. (2015). Fairness constraints: Mechanisms for fair classification. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1507.05259
Zhang, Y., & Zheng, L. (2024). Peer assessment to promote self-regulated learning with technology in higher education: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1376505. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024. 1376505
Tải xuống
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .
