Đề xuất mô hình đồng sáng tạo cùng AI và vận dụng trong thiết kế hoạt động dạy học: Nghiên cứu trường hợp dạy học lập trình với sự hỗ trợ của Chatbot AI cho sinh viên đại học

Các tác giả

  • Phạm Kim Chung Trường Đại học Giáo dục - Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội
  • Lê Chí Nguyện Trường Đại học Giáo dục - Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội
  • Hoàng Bảo Long Trường Đại học Khoa học và Công nghệ Hà Nội

Tóm tắt

In the context of artificial intelligence (AI) being increasingly widely applied in education, this study focuses on proposing and testing a teaching model of programming integrated with AI Chatbot in the direction of co-creation to promote students' initiative, critical thinking and creativity. The article uses a case study method combined with a student survey according to the TAM model (Davis, 1989) and SRL (Zimmerman, 2000), and open interviews to assess the effectiveness, initiative and satisfaction of students in the learning process with AI Chatbot. The results show that the co-creation model with artificial intelligence has a positive impact on improving students' programming ability, critical thinking and interest in learning. This study is considered a useful document in designing teaching activities integrating artificial intelligence in the direction of co-creation, developing digital capacity and creative thinking for students in higher education.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.

Bộ GD-ĐT (2025). Thông tư số 02/2025/TT-BGDĐT ngày 24/01/2025 quy định Khung năng lực số cho người học.

Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., ... & Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877-1901. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2005.14165

Daugherty, P. R., & Wilson, H. J. (2018). Human + Machine: Reimagining work in the age of AI. Harvard Business Review Press.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Eco, U. (1992). Die Grenzen der Interpretation. BoD-Books on Demand.

Gunning, D., Stefik, M., Choi, J., Miller, T., Stumpf, S., & Yang, G. Z. (2019). XAI-Explainable artificial intelligence. Science Robotics, 4(37), eaay7120. https://doi.org/10.1126/scirobotics.aay7120

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., ... & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Lubart, T., & Thornhill-Miller, B. (2019). Creativity and artificial intelligence: A conceptual and critical review. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 768. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00768

Luckin, R., Cukurova, M., Kent, C., & Du Boulay, B. (2022). Empowering educators to be AI-ready. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100076

Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence unleashed: An argument for AI in education. Pearson Education.

OpenAI (2023). GPT-4 technical report. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2303.08774

Pleschová, G., & Hýblová, A. (2024). Artificial intelligence and creativity: Anthropological, sociological and pedagogical reflections. Geopolitical, Social Security and Freedom Journal, 7(1), 22-35.

Rudolph, J., Tan, S., & Tan, S. (2023). War of the chatbots: Bard, Bing Chat, ChatGPT, Ernie and beyond. The new AI gold rush and its impact on higher education. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 364-389.

UNESCO (2024). AI competency framework for students. UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54675/JKJB9835

VanLehn, K. (2011). The relative effectiveness of human tutoring, intelligent tutoring systems, and other tutoring systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4), 197-221.

Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education-where are the educators?. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0

Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation: A social cognitive perspective. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 13-39). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50031-7

Đã Xuất bản

20.08.2025

Cách trích dẫn

Phạm, K. C., Lê, C. N., & Hoàng, B. L. (2025). Đề xuất mô hình đồng sáng tạo cùng AI và vận dụng trong thiết kế hoạt động dạy học: Nghiên cứu trường hợp dạy học lập trình với sự hỗ trợ của Chatbot AI cho sinh viên đại học. Tạp Chí Giáo dục, 25(16), 54–59. Truy vấn từ https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/3843

Số

Chuyên mục

Các bài báo