Bồi dưỡng tư duy đại số cho học sinh trung học cơ sở: Quan niệm, cấu trúc và biện pháp
Tóm tắt
Algebraic thinking plays an important role in secondary school math programs, especially in the current context of education reform to improve teaching quality. However, the methods used to develop students’ algebraic thinking are still limited and not as effective as expected. This study reviews and summarizes international research articles indexed in the Scopus, ERIC, and the Journal of Education over the past two decades. The goal is to identify teaching strategies that are both effective and practical. Through this review, six key strategies have been identified: (1) Helping students recognize patterns and make generalizations; (2) Using different ways to represent and model math ideas; (3) Improving students’ ability to use math language and algebraic symbols; (4) Teaching problem-solving through real-life situations; (5) Using cross-subject (interdisciplinary) teaching to support algebraic thinking and (6) Combining assessment with professional development for teachers. This study offers useful information for teaching algebraic thinking and highlights the importance of improving teacher competence and continuing further research in real classroom settings.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
Azizah, N., Usodo, B., & Saputro, D. R. S. (2020). The written mathematical communication ability of junior high school students in solving set problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1538(1), 012103.
Baldinger, E. E., Staats, S., Covington Clarkson, L. M., Gullickson, E. C., Norman, F., & Akoto, B. (2020). A review of conceptions of secondary mathematics in integrated STEM education: Returning voice to the silent M. Integrated approaches to STEM education: An international perspective, 67-90.
Basista, B., & Mathews, S. (2002). Integrated science and mathematics professional development programs. School Science and Mathematics, 102(7), 359-370.
Bills, L., Ainley, J., & Wilson, K. (2006). Modes of algebraic communication - Moving from spreadsheets to standard notation. For the Learning of Mathematics, 26(1), 41-46.
Bognar, B., Jukić Matić, L., & Sablić, M. (2024). Professional development interventions for mathematics teachers: A systematic review. Mathematics Teaching Research Journal, 15(6), 39-58.
Bouck, E. C., Anderson, R. D., Long, H., & Sprick, J. (2021). Manipulative-Based Instructional Sequences in Mathematics for Students With Disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 54(3), 226-234.
Esuong, U. U., Owan, V. J., Edoho, E. A., & Eni, B. E. (2023). Mathematics symbol instruction and senior secondary students’ achievement in word problems: A quasi-experimental study. Pedagogical Research, 8(1), Article em0142. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/12595
Fainstein, R., & Rothstein, S. (2022). 3 Strategies to Get Students Talking in Math Classrooms. Edutopia.
Goos, M., & Kaya, S. (2020). Understanding and promoting students’ mathematical thinking: A review of research published in ESM. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 103(1), 7-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09921-7
Hajizah, M. N., Wijayanti, D. A., & Darhim, D. (2021). Realistic mathematics education on teaching functions to develop algebraic thinking skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1869(1), 012130. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1869/1/012130
Hodgen, J., Oldenburg, R., & Strømskag, H. (2018). Algebraic thinking. In L. D. English & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Developing research in mathematics education (pp. 32-45). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315113562-4
Jacobs, J., Assaf, L. C., & Lee, K. S. (2007). Professional development for teacher educators: Conflicts between critical reflection and instructional-based strategies. Professional Development in Education, 33(3), 345-360. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415250701604794
Kaput, J. J. (2008). What is algebra? What is algebraic reasoning? In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 5-17). Lawrence Erlbaum.
Kaput, J. J., Carraher, D. W., & Blanton, M. L. (Eds.). (2008). Algebra in the early grades (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315097435
Kelley, T. R., & Knowles, J. G. (2016). A conceptual framework for integrated STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 11.
Kieran, C. (2004). Algebraic thinking in the early grades: What is it? The Mathematics Educator, 8(1), 139-151.
Kusumaningsih, W., Darhim, D., Herman, T., & Turmudi, T. (2018). Improvement algebraic thinking ability using multiple representation strategy on realistic mathematics education. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 281-290. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5404.281-290
Lee, K., Ng, S. F., Bull, R., Pe, M. L., & Ho, R. H. M. (2011). Are patterns important? An investigation of the relationships between proficiencies in patterns, computation, executive functioning, and algebraic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 269-281. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023068
Liadiani, A. M., Widayati, A. K., & Lestari, G. K. (2020). How to develop the algebraic thinking of students in mathematics learning. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 3, 310-316.
Nguyen, P. C., Ngo, T. T. Q., & Nguyen, T. H. P. (2018). Teaching mathematics at the high school level in an integrated way. Vietnam Journal of Education, 5, 21-27.
Nguyễn Thị Nga (2019). Sự liên môn Toán-Vật lí trong dạy học chủ đề vectơ ở trường phổ thông: Nghiên cứu quan hệ cá nhân của giáo viên Toán và Vật lí. Tạp chí Khoa học, Trường Đại học Sư phạm Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh, 15(1), 40-47.
Nguyễn Hữu Nhanh Tiến, Nguyễn Thị Duyến (2019). Quan sát tư duy đại số của học sinh từ góc nhìn của giáo viên Toán tương lai. Tạp chí Khoa học và Giáo dục, Trường Đại học Sư phạm - Đại học Huế, 2(50), 48-59.
Nguyễn Ngọc Giang (2019). Tích hợp Toán học, Tin học và Vật lí. NXB Đại học Quốc gia Hà Nội.
Nguyễn Ngọc Giang, Nguyễn Ái Quốc, Phạm Huyền Trang, Huỳnh Thị Tuyết Mai (2025). Bồi dưỡng tư duy đại số trong dạy học bài toán thực tiễn chủ đề “Hàm số 2y=ax, a≠0 và phương trình bậc hai một ẩn” (Toán 9). Tạp chí Giáo dục, 25(5), 24-29.
Nguyễn Tiến Trung, Bùi Minh Đức, Nguyễn Văn Thái Bình, Nguyễn Chiến Thắng (2024). Mối quan hệ giữa kiến thức, niềm tin và thực hành dạy học của giáo viên Toán: Một nghiên cứu tổng quan. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 24(24), 38-46.
Odondi, A., & Aje, C. T. (2025). Leveraging algebraic thinking in STEM education to equip the next generation of problem solvers. Proceedings of the Institute for STEM Education Research Conference.
Radford, L. (2000). Signs and meanings in students’ emergent algebraic thinking: A semiotic analysis. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 42, 237-268. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017530828058
Radford, L. (2008). Iconicity and contraction: A semiotic investigation of forms of algebraic generalizations of patterns in different contexts. ZDM - International Journal on Mathematics Education, 40(1), 83-96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-007-0061-0
Rohid, N., Suryaman, & Rusmawati, R. D. (2019). Students’ Mathematical Communication Skills (MCS) in Solving Mathematics Problems: A Case in Indonesian Context. Anatolian Journal of Education, 4(2), 19-30. https://doi.org/10.29333/aje.2019.423a
Rupasinghe, D. D., Vitharana, P. R. K. A., & Amarasinghe, A. (2023). Professional development of mathematics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in teaching basic algebra. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 7(7), 469-479. https://dx.doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2023.70735
Sibgatullin, I. R., Korzhuev, A. V., Khairullina, E. R., Sadykova, A. R., Baturina, R. V., & Chauzova, V. (2022). A systematic review on algebraic thinking in education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11486
Sproesser, U., Vogel, M., Dörfler, E., & Eichler, A. (2022). Changing between representations of elementary functions: Students’ competencies and differences with a specific perspective on school track and gender. International Journal of STEM Education, 9(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-022-00350-8
Van Eerde, H. A. A., & Hajer, M. (2009). The integration of mathematics and language learning in multiethnic schools. In M. Cesar & K. Kompulainen (Eds.), Social Interactions in Multicultural Settings (pp. 269-296). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Walkington, C., Clinton, V., Ritter, S., & Nathan, M. J. (2018). Personalizing algebra to students’ individual interests in an intelligent tutoring system: Moderators of impact. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 28(4), 497-523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-018-0160-9
Wettergren, S. (2022). Identifying and promoting young students’ early algebraic thinking. LUMAT, 10(2), 190-214. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.10.2.1617
Windsor, W. (2010). Algebraic thinking: A problem solving approach. In L. Sparrow, B. Kissane, & C. Hurst (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 665-672). MERGA.
Zazkis, R., & Liljedahl, P. (2002). Generalization of patterns: The tension between algebraic thinking and algebraic notation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(3), 361-378.
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .
