Xây dựng khung hệ thống tiêu chí đánh giá thể chế phát triển giáo dục Việt Nam đáp ứng yêu cầu phát triển nhanh và bền vững đất nước
Tóm tắt
In the context of contemporary educational reform, developing a criteria system for evaluating the institutional framework for Vietnam's educational system development in response to the country's rapid and sustainable development represents an issue of considerable significance. Practical experience has demonstrated that the refinement of such an institutional framework is both a necessary and urgent undertaking. The present study aims to examine and propose the development of an evaluation criteria system. Documentary research methods combined with theoretical analysis were employed, in combination with the Delphi method. Consultation with 20 experts indicates that there are 8 core bases for constructing the evaluation criteria system, along with 10 evaluation criteria. The findings of this study provide policymakers and educators with a comprehensive perspective to formulate strategies and plans for developing Vietnam's educational system in accordance with the requirements of rapid and sustainable development. This research may also serve as a foundation for further studies and a reference for interested readers.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Critcher, C., & Gladstone, B. (1998). Utilizing The Delphi Technique In Policy Discussion: A Case Study Of A Privatized Utility In Britain. Public Administration, 76, 431-449. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9299.00110
Chu, H. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2008). A Delphi-based approach to developing expert systems with the cooperation of multiple experts. Expert Systems with Applications, 34(4), 2826-2840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2007.05.034
De Loë, R. C., Melnychuk, N., Murray, D., & Plummer, R. (2016). Advancing the state of policy Delphi practice: A systematic review evaluating methodological evolution, innovation, and opportunities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 104, 78-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.12.009
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160.
Hasson, F., Keeney, S., & McKenna, H. (2000). Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 32(4), 1008-1015. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.t01-1-01567.x
Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69(1), 3-19.
Leal Filho, W., Abubakar, I. R., Mifsud, M. C., Eustachio, J. H. P. P., Albrecht, C. F., Dinis, M. A. P., Borsari, B., Sharifi, A., Levesque, V. R., Ribeiro, P. C. C., LeVasseur, T. J., Pace, P., Trevisan, L. V., & Dibbern, T. A. (2025). Governance in the implementation of the UN sustainable development goals in higher education: Global trends. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 27(9), 20695-20718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03278-x
Lê Khánh Tuấn (2024). Chính sách phát triển giáo dục. NXB Giáo dục Việt Nam.
Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.). (1975). The Delphi method: Techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley.
Mejía Zambrano, F., Escobar-Sierra, M., & Polanco, J.-A. (2026). Validation of a measurement model for university governance in an accredited public higher education institution using PLS-SEM. Education Sciences, 16(3), 455. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16030455
Murry, J. W., Jr., & Hammons, J. O. (1995). Delphi: A versatile methodology for conducting qualitative research. The Review of Higher Education, 18(4), 423-436.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
Nguyen, C. H. (2024). Investigating professional development policy and practice for educational policy-makers in Vietnam: An exploratory study. Vietnam Journal of Education, 8(1), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.52296/vje.2024.359
Nguyễn Thị Mỹ Trinh, Nguyễn Thị Trang (2023). Thể chế hoá Nghị quyết 29-NQ/TW trong xây dựng chính sách pháp luật và đổi mới quản lí nhà nước về giáo dục mầm non. Tạp chí Khoa học Giáo dục Việt Nam, 12(1), 13-19.
Osborne, S. P. (2006). The new public governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377-387.
Roos, N., Sassen, R., & Guenther, E. (2023). Sustainability governance toward an organizational sustainability culture at German higher education institutions. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(3), 553-583. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSHE-09-2021-0396
Sinha, I. P., Smyth, R. L., & Williamson, P. R. (2011). Using the Delphi technique to determine which outcomes to measure in clinical trials: Recommendations for the future based on a systematic review of existing studies. PLOS Medicine, 8(1), Article e1000393. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000393
Tạ Ngọc Tấn, Trần Quốc Toản (2023). Xây dựng, hoàn thiện thể chế phát triển nhanh và bền vững đất nước trong giai đoạn mới. Tạp chí Cộng sản điện tử. https://tapchicongsan.org.vn/web/guest/tin-tieu-diem/-/asset_publisher/s5L7xhQiJeKe/content/xay-dung-hoan-thien-the-che-phat-trien-nhanh-va-ben-vung-dat-nuoc-trong-giai-doan-moi
Trịnh Thị Anh Hoa, Nguyễn Đức Minh, Nguyễn Lê Vân Dung, Phạm Thị Bích Đào, Trịnh Vân Hà (2024). Thực trạng và định hướng nghiên cứu khoa học quản lí giáo dục. Tạp chí Khoa học Giáo dục Việt Nam, 20(2), 1-7.
UNESCO (2015). Education 2030: Incheon declaration and framework for action for the implementation of Sustainable Development Goal 4. UNESCO.
Tải xuống
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Bản quyền (c) 2026 Tạp chí Giáo dục
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .
