Khảo sát quan niệm sai lầm về chủ đề “Công, năng lượng và công suất” của học sinh Việt Nam với bài kiểm tra ba bậc

Các tác giả

  • Ngô Thanh Huyền Trường Đại học Sư phạm Hà Nội
  • Nguyễn Văn Biên Trường Đại học Sư phạm Hà Nội
  • Vũ Ngọc Huyền Trường Đại học Sư phạm Hà Nội
  • Nguyễn Đức Đạt Trường Đại học Sư phạm Hà Nội

Tóm tắt

Many studies worldwide have identified students’ common misconceptions when learning the topics “Work, energy, and power”; however, no research has pinpointed the misconceptions of Vietnamese students. Therefore, to investigate the misconceptions of Vietnamese students, our research team utilized a three-tier test while teaching the topic “Work, Energy, and Power”, which is the Work, Energy, and Power Concept Test (WPECT), developed and validated by Turkish educational experts. The objectives of this study are (1) To assess the validity of the WPECT in evaluating the misconceptions of Vietnamese students regarding the topic of “Work, Energy, and Power” and (2) To examine the misconceptions of Vietnamese students through the test. The WPECT test was administered to 199 students from 10 schools. The results indicate that the WPECT test is suitable with Vietnamese students, and Vietnamese students still hold certain misconceptions even after learning this topic in class. From a solution-oriented perspective, the research findings suggest that students who have been taught with STEM approaches tend to have fewer misconceptions.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Arslan, H. O., Cigdemoglu, C., & Moseley, C. (2012). A Three-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Pre-Service Teachers’ Misconceptions about Global Warming, Greenhouse Effect, Ozone Layer Depletion, and Acid Rain. International Journal of Science Education, 34(11), 1667-1686. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2012.680618

Bộ GD-ĐT (2018). Chương trình giáo dục phổ thông môn Vật lí (ban hành kèm theo Thông tư số 32/2018/TT-BGDĐT ngày 26/12/2018).

Cataloglu, E. (2002). Development and Validation of an Achievement Test in Introductory Quantum Mechanics: the Quantum Mechanics Visualization Instrument (Qmvi). May, 196.

Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989-1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a

Hestenes, D., & Halloun, I. (1995). Interpreting the force concept inventory: A response to March 1995 critique by Huffman and Heller. The Physics Teacher, 33(8), 502-502. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.2344278

Irmak, M., Inaltun, H., Ercan-Dursun, J., Yaniş-Kelleci, H., & Yürük, N. (2023). Development and Application of a Three-Tier Diagnostic Test to Assess Pre-service Science Teachers’ Understanding on Work-Power and Energy Concepts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 21(1), 159-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10242-6

Kirbulut, Z. D., & Geban, O. (2014). Using three-tier diagnostic test to assess students’ misconceptions of states of matter. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5), 509-521. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2014.1128a

Peşman, H., & Eryilmaz, A. (2010). Development of a three-tier test to assess misconceptions about simple electric circuits. Journal of Educational Research, 103(3), 208-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383002

Phạm Thị Phương Anh, Phan Đức Duy, Nguyễn Thị Diệu Phương (2023). Sử dụng bài kiểm tra chẩn đoán ba bậc để xác định các ngộ nhận của học sinh trong dạy học phần “Di truyền học” cấp trung học phổ thông. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 23(7), 24-29.

Plotz, T. (2017). Students’ conceptions of radiation and what to do about them. Physics Education, 52(1), 14004. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/52/1/014004

Saglam-Arslan, A. (2010). Cross-Grade comparison of students’ Understanding of energy concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(3), 303-313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-009-9201-3

Suprapto, N. (2020). Do We Experience Misconceptions?: An Ontological Review of Misconceptions in Science. Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education, 1(2), 50-55. https://doi.org/10.46627/sipose.v1i2.24

Taslidere, E. (2016). Development and use of a three-tier diagnostic test to assess high school students’ misconceptions about the photoelectric effect. Research in Science and Technological Education, 34(2), 164-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2015.1124409

Treagust, D. (1986). Evaluating students’ misconceptions by means of diagnostic multiple choice items. Research in Science Education, 16(1), 199-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356835

Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1987). Theories of Knowledge Restructuring in Development. Review of Educational Research, 57(1), 51-67. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543057001051

Warren, J. W. (1986). At what stage should energy be taught? Physics Education, 21(3), 154-156. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9120/21/3/307

Tải xuống

Đã Xuất bản

05.07.2024

Cách trích dẫn

Ngô, T. H., Nguyễn, V. B., Vũ, N. H., & Nguyễn, Đức Đạt. (2024). Khảo sát quan niệm sai lầm về chủ đề “Công, năng lượng và công suất” của học sinh Việt Nam với bài kiểm tra ba bậc. Tạp Chí Giáo dục, 24(13), 29–35. Truy vấn từ https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/2040

Số

Chuyên mục

Các bài báo