Một số yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến sự hài lòng trong công việc của giáo viên tiểu học trong bối cảnh thực hiện Chương trình Giáo dục phổ thông 2018
Tóm tắt
Teacher job satisfaction is one of the critical factors determining the effectiveness of schools, especially in the context of fundamental changes such as curriculum reform. In the implementation of the General Education Curriculum 2018 in Vietnam, teacher job satisfaction has emerged as a key concern to ensure that the curriculum reform achieves its intended goals. To enhance teacher satisfaction during the implementation of this new curriculum, this study presents findings from research that explores four potential influencing factors and identifies which of them significantly affect teacher job satisfaction in the context of the new curriculum. Data was collected in July 2023, resulting in a final dataset of 302 valid responses. The study employed Partial Least Squares-Structural Equation Modeling (PLSSEM) to analyze the data. The results revealed that among the four factors examined, two had a statistically significant impact on the job satisfaction of primary school teachers during the implementation of the new curriculum: teachers’ professional development and school manager support. These findings provide valuable insights for educational policymakers and school administrators aiming to improve teacher motivation and ensure the successful implementation of educational reform.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Âu Quang Hiếu, Trần Thị Thu Hương (2023). Đánh giá các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến sự hài lòng trong công việc của giáo viên tiểu học tại Hà Nội. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 23(16), 40-45.
Bernard, H. R. (2017). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Rowman & Littlefield.
Boyd, C. M., Bakker, A. B., Pignata, S., Winefield, A. H., Gillespie, N., & Stough, C. (2011). A longitudinal test of the job demands-resources model among Australian university academics. Applied Psychology, 60(1), 112-140.
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2012). School climate and social--emotional learning: Predicting teacher stress, job satisfaction, and teaching efficacy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1189.
Dinham, S., & Scott, C. (2000). Moving into the third, outer domain of teacher satisfaction. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(4), 379-396. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578230010373633
Dorozynska, A. (2017). Teacher job satisfaction in primary schools: The relation to work environment. Department of Education and Special Education.
Ertürk, R. (2021). The relationship between school administrators’ supportive behaviors and teachers’ job satisfaction and subjective well-being. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(4), 184-195.
Evans, L. (2002). What is teacher development? Oxford Review of Education, 28(1), 123-137.
Gonzales, G., Gonzales, R., Costan, F., & Himang, C. (2020). Dimensions of motivation in teaching: Relations with social support climate, teacher efficacy, emotional exhaustion, and job satisfaction. Education Research International, 2020, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8820259
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook. Springer Nature.
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C., & Sarstedt, M. (2016). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). California: Sage Publications.
Hair, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123.
Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2013). Partial least squares structural equation modeling: Rigorous applications, better results and higher acceptance. Long Range Planning, 46(1-2), 1-12.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43, 115-135.
Hertzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. (1959). The motivation to work. New York.
Hoppock, R. (1935). Job Satisfaction. New York: Harpers Brothers.
Nguyen, V. H., Nguyen, V. B. H., Vu, T. M. H., Hoang, T. K. H., Nguyen, T. M. N. (2020). Vietnamese education system and teacher training: Focusing on science education. Asia-Pacific Science Education, 6(1), 179-206.
Nyamubi, G. J. (2017). Determinants of secondary school teachers’ job satisfaction in Tanzania. Education Research International, 2017(1), 7282614. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7282614
Özer, N., & Beycioglu, K. (2010). The relationship between teacher professional development and burnout. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 4928-4932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.797
Pham, K. T., Ha, X. Van, Tran, N. H., & Nguyen, Y. T. X. (2023). Curriculum reform in Vietnam: primary teachers’ views, experiences, and challenges. Education 3-13, 51(3), 440-451.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.55.1.68
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2009). Does school context matter? Relations with teacher burnout and job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(3), 518-524.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2011). Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(6), 1029-1038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.001
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2014). Teacher self-efficacy and perceived autonomy: Relations with teacher engagement, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. Psychological Reports, 114(1), 68-77.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2016). Teacher stress and teacher self-efficacy as predictors of engagement, emotional exhaustion, and motivation to leave the teaching profession. Creative Education, 7(13), 1785.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2017). Motivated for teaching? Associations with school goal structure, teacher self-efficacy, job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 152-160.
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2020). Teacher burnout: relations between dimensions of burnout, perceived school context, job satisfaction and motivation for teaching. A longitudinal study. Teachers and Teaching, 26(7-8), 602-616. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2021.1913404
Smet, M. (2021). Professional development and teacher job satisfaction: Evidence from a multilevel model. Mathematics, 10(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10010051
OECD (2020). Teachers and school leaders as valued professionals: Status, working conditions and satisfaction. In Teachers and School Leaders as Valued Professionals: OECD Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 Results (Volume II) (pp. 39-71). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19cf08df-en
Timperley, H., Ell, F., Le Fevre, D., & Twyford, K. (2019). Leading professional learning: Practical strategies for impact in schools. Acer Press.
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .
