Sử dụng công cụ số trong đánh giá quá trình về kĩ năng đọc tiếng Anh của học sinh tiểu học: từ góc nhìn của giáo viên đến hàm ý sư phạm

Các tác giả

  • Lê Thị Duyên Trường Đại học Quốc tế Sài Gòn
  • Lê Hoàng Dũng Trường Đại học Khoa học Xã hội và Nhân văn - Đại học Quốc gia Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh

Tóm tắt

In international primary schools in Ho Chi Minh City, digital technology has successfully supported formative assessment in reading instruction. The study explores English teachers’ perceptions at an international primary school in Ho Chi Minh City regarding the integration of digital tools for formative assessment in teaching reading skills to fifth-grade students. The study yields three key findings based on semi-structured interviews and thematic analysis: (1) the teachers agreed that online resources supported students with timely feedback and engaged them with authentic tasks; (2) the teachers identified practical challenges in the mainstream context of primary classrooms, including the challenge of managing student distractions and the pedagogical challenge of adapting tools to meet the needs of primary students; (3) the pedagogical component of the model was the overarching factor that demonstrates teachers' integrated technological, pedagogical, and content competencies, and thus is helpful in leveraging the potential of technology in the service of learning. The study confirms that the effective use of technology for formative assessment is determined more by teachers' pedagogical design and less by the availability of tools, which points to clear implications for teacher professional development and policy.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy và Practice, 5(1), 7-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Braun, V., và Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Carless, D. (2005). Prospects for the implementation of assessment for learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy và Practice, 12(1), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594042000333904

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, và M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed., pp. 101-111). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9

Murphy, A., & Arciuli, J. (2024). Digital reading comprehension instruction in English for children with English as an additional language: A systematic review. Journal of Research in Reading, 47(2), 215-237. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12448

Salainti, E., & Neman, M. I. E. (2024). Teachers’ perception of using digital game-based learning in teaching and learning process. EDUKASIA: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 955-962. https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v5i1.904

Shanahan, T. (2020). What constitutes a science of reading instruction? Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S235-S247. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.349

Wiliam, D., & Thompson, M. (2007). Integrating assessment with learning: What will it take to make it work? In C. A. Dwyer (Ed.), The future of assessment: Shaping teaching and learning (pp. 53-82). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Xuan, Q., Cheung, A., & Sun, D. (2022). The effectiveness of formative assessment for enhancing reading achievement in K-12 classrooms: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, Article 990196. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.990196

Zhyhadlo, O. Y. (2022). Application of digital game-based tools for formative assessment at foreign language lessons. Information Technologies and Learning Tools, 87(1), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v87i1.4703

Tải xuống

Đã Xuất bản

05.12.2025

Cách trích dẫn

Lê, T. D., & Lê, H. D. (2025). Sử dụng công cụ số trong đánh giá quá trình về kĩ năng đọc tiếng Anh của học sinh tiểu học: từ góc nhìn của giáo viên đến hàm ý sư phạm. Tạp Chí Giáo dục, 25(23), 35–40. Truy vấn từ https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/4437

Số

Chuyên mục

Các bài báo