Giảng dạy theo nguyên tắc “Tương thích kiến tạo” trong giáo dục nghề nghiệp nhằm nâng cao năng lực của sinh viên
Tóm tắt
In order to meet the requirements of society in providing the labor market with professional and highly qualified human resources, it is necessary for vocational education institutions to enhance the quality of training to equip their graduates with appropriate professional knowledge and skills. One of the solutions to this issue is applying Constructive Alignment (Biggs, 1996) to teaching. Constructive Alignment is one of the most influential ideas in education (Houghton, 2004). The outstanding feature of Constructive Alignment is to establish an alignment of learning outcomes, teaching - learning activities based on Constructivism Theory (Piaget, 1950) and assessment to help students develop competencies to meet job requirements. This article presents the research results at a vocational institution in Ho Chi Minh City and proposes some solutions to promote the role of Constructive Alignment in ensuring and enhancing the quality of training to meet the core requirements of teaching, learning and assessment.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher education, 32(3), 347-364.
Biggs, J. (2014). Constructive alignment in university teaching. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 1, 5-22.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for quality learning at university. Berkshire. England: McGraw-Hill.
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (4th ed). Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press. Maidenhead: UK.
Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does. 1st ed. Philadelphia: Society for Research into Higher Education: Open University Press.
Cross, D. R., & Paris, S. G. (1988). Developmental and instructional analyses of children's metacognition and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(2), 131-142.
Dewey, J. (1923). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. Macmillan.
Houghton, W. (2004). Engineering subject centre guide: Learning and teaching theory for engineering academics. Loughborough University.
Kandlbinder, P. (2014). Theorising teaching and learning in higher education research. In Theory and Method in Higher Education Research II. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Lê Văn Hảo (2020). Một số yếu tố tương thích trong phát triển và thực hiện chương trình đào tạo của giáo dục đại học. Kỉ yếu hội thảo “Nâng cao chất lượng hoạt động đào tạo đại học đáp ứng yêu cầu hội nhập và đổi mới theo cách tiếp cận AUN-QA”. Trường Đại học Khoa học Xã hội và Nhân văn, tr 3-10.
Piaget, J. (1950). The Psychology of Intelligence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Shuell, T. J. (1986). Concepciones cognitivas del aprendizaje. Revisión de la investigación educativa, 56(4), 411-436.
Spady, W. G. (1994). Outcome-Based Education: Critical Issues and Answers. American Association of School Administrators.
Tran, N. D., Nguyen, T. T., & Nguyen, M. T. (2011). The standard of quality for HEIs in Vietnam: A step in the right direction?. Quality Assurance in Education, 19(2), 130-140.
Tyler, R. W. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wang, X., Su, Y., Cheung, S., Wong, E., & Kwong, T. (2013). An exploration of Biggs’ constructive alignment in course design and its impact on students’ learning approaches. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(4), 477-491.
Tải xuống
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .
