Mô hình đồng hành liên ngành trong giáo dục đặc biệt ở kỉ nguyên số: Vai trò của trí tuệ nhân tạo trong một cách tiếp cận khẳng định đa dạng thần kinh
Tóm tắt
This study develops a conceptual model for interdisciplinary accompaniment in special education in the digital era and clarifies the appropriate role of artificial intelligence (AI) within that model. An integrative review and concept analysis were conducted across literature on AI in education, disability, neurodiversity, interdisciplinary collaboration, co-regulation, and child data ethics. The synthesis identifies a five-component cycle: jointly defining learner priorities; collecting minimal, contextualized functional data; using AI to organize data and generate reviewable suggestions; interdisciplinary interpretation and decision-making; and implementation, feedback, and adjustment. AI is positioned as a support for pattern detection and workload reduction rather than an autonomous diagnostic or decision-making authority. The model is governed by learner participation, human oversight, data minimization, explainability, fairness, and accountability. The paper also distinguishes evidence-supported claims from conceptual propositions and outlines conditions for small-scale empirical testing in Vietnam. The model offers a framework for future research; it does not establish effectiveness.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Armstrong, T. (2015). The myth of the normal brain: Embracing neurodiversity. AMA Journal of Ethics, 17(4), 348-352. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2015.17.4.msoc1-1504
Basham, J. D., Blackorby, J., & Marino, M. T. (2020). Opportunity in crisis: The role of universal design for learning in educational redesign. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 18(1), 71-91.
Bộ GD-ĐT (2018). Thông tư số 03/2018/TT-BGDĐT ngày 29/01/2018 Quy định về giáo dục hòa nhập đối với người khuyết tật.
Crompton, C. J., Sharp, M., Axbey, H., Fletcher-Watson, S., Flynn, E. G., & Ropar, D. (2020). Neurotype-matching, but not being autistic, influences self and observer ratings of interpersonal rapport. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 586171. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.586171
Cano, S., Cubillos, C., Alfaro, R., Romo, A., García, M., & Moreira, F. (2024). Wearable solutions using physiological signals for stress monitoring on individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD): A systematic literature review. Sensors, 24(24), 8137. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24248137
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Milton, D. E. M. (2012). On the ontological status of autism: The ‘double empathy problem’. Disability & Society, 27(6), 883-887. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2012.710008
Miao, F., Holmes, W., Huang, R., & Zhang, H. (2021). AI and education: Guidance for policy-makers. UNESCO Publishing. https://doi.org/10.54675/PCSP7350
UNICEF (2021). Policy guidance on AI for children (Version 2.0). https://www.unicef.org/innocenti/media/1341/file/UNICEF-Global-Insight-policy-guidance-AI-children-2.0-2021.pdf
Walker, N. (2021). Neuroqueer heresies: Notes on the neurodiversity paradigm, autistic empowerment, and postnormal possibilities. Autonomous Press.
Zhang, L., Carter, R. A., Jr., Liu, Y., & Peng, P. (2026). Let’s CHAT about artificial intelligence for students with disabilities: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 96(1), 215-257. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543241293424
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Bản quyền (c) 2026 Tạp chí Giáo dục
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .









