Tổ chức hoạt động hợp tác giải quyết vấn đề thông qua bài toán kết thúc mở trong dạy học môn Toán lớp 6
Tóm tắt
In the context of competency-based educational reform, organizing learning activities to develop students' collaborative problem-solving skills has gained increased attention. However, current research mainly approaches collaboration and problem-solving as two relatively independent components, while the exploitation of open-ended problems as a means of organizing collaborative problem-solving learning has not been systematically explored. This study uses a theoretical research method to propose a process for organizing collaborative problem-solving activities with open-ended problems, comprising three stages: Designing a differentiated system of open-ended problems; Organizing collaborative problem-solving activities; and Evaluating, reflecting on, and adjusting the learning process. The process is illustrated through teaching the content “Calculating the area and perimeter of a rectangle” (Mathematics 6). Research results contribute to supplementing the theoretical basis and providing reference materials for teachers in organizing collaborative problem-solving activities through open-ended problems in teaching mathematics in secondary schools.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Becker, J. P., & Shimada, S. (Eds.). (1997). The open-ended approach: A new proposal for teaching mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Bingolbali, E., & Bingolbali, F. (2021). An examination of open-ended mathematics questions’ affordances. International Journal of Progressive Education, 17(4), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2021.366.1
Bộ GD-ĐT (2018). Chương trình giáo dục phổ thông môn Toán (ban hành kèm theo Thông tư số 32/2018/TT-BGDĐT, ngày 26/12/2018 của Bộ trưởng Bộ GD-ĐT).
Care, E., & Griffin, P. (2017). Assessment of collaborative problem-solving processes. In B. Csapó & J. Funke (Eds.), The nature of problem solving: Using research to inspire 21st century learning (pp. 227-243). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264273955-16-en
Dillenbourg, P. (Ed.). (1999). Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches. Elsevier.
Fiore, S. M., Smith-Jentsch, K. A., Salas, E., Warner, N., & Letsky, M. (2010). Towards an understanding of macrocognition in teams: Developing and defining complex collaborative processes and products. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 11(4), 250-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/14639221003729128
Funke, J. (2010). Complex problem solving: A case for complex cognition? Cognitive Processing, 11(2), 133-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-009-0345-0
Hesse, F. W., Care, E., Buder, J., Sassenberg, K., & Griffin, P. (2015). A framework for teachable collaborative problem solving skills. In P. Griffin & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills: Methods and approach (pp. 37-56). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9395-7_2
Hiebert, J., Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Fuson, K., Human, P., Murray, H., Olivier, A., & Wearne, D. (1997). Making mathematics problematic: A rejoinder to Prawat and Smith. Educational Researcher, 26(2), 24-26. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X026002024
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2009). An educational psychology success story: Social interdependence theory and cooperative learning. Educational Researcher, 38(5), 365-379. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09339057
Kyllonen, P. C. (2012). Measurement of 21st century skills within the Common Core State Standards [Paper presentation]. Invitational Research Symposium on Technology Enhanced Assessments. Educational Testing Service.
Mayer, R. E. (1998). Cognitive, metacognitive, and motivational aspects of problem solving. Instructional Science, 26, 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003088013286
O’Neil, H. F., Chuang, S. H., & Chung, G. K. W. K. (2003). Issues in the computer-based assessment of collaborative problem solving. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 10(3), 361-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594032000148190
OECD (2017). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: Science, reading, mathematic, financial literacy and collaborative problem solving. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264281820-en
Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1972). The psychology of the child. Basic Books.
Rizos, I., & Gkrekas, N. (2023). Incorporating history of mathematics in open-ended problem solving: An empirical study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 19(3), em2242. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/13025
Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 29(3), 75-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-997-0003-x
Straus, D. A. (2002). How to make collaboration work: Powerful ways to build consensus, solve problems, and make decisions. Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
Trần Vui (2014). Giải quyết vấn đề thực tế trong dạy học Toán. NXB Đại học Huế.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Tải xuống
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Bản quyền (c) 2026 Tạp chí Giáo dục
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .
