Mô hình ra quyết định chiến lược với sự hỗ trợ của trí tuệ nhân tạo theo quan điểm của nhà quản lí giáo dục
Tóm tắt
All over the world, many higher education institutions have successfully implemented strategic decision-support models to optimize management processes, meeting labor market demands, and enhancing teaching quality. This paper explores strategic decision-support models for educational managers in higher education, focusing on the challenges and opportunities associated with implementing these models. A systematic review following the PRISMA methodology was employed to select and analyze relevant studies from the Scopus database. Additionally, the VOSviewer software was used to perform a keyword network analysis, identifying key themes and research trends in the field. The results of the study indicate that decision-support models based on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and big data analytics have been successfully implemented in many higher education institutions worldwide. Key success factors include robust technological infrastructure, the technological proficiency of educational leaders, and the flexibility of the models. However, the study also highlights the challenges educational managers face also discusses international experiences in implementing decision-support systems and proposes solutions for adapting these models to the Vietnamese educational context.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Arnold, K. E., & Pistilli, M. D. (2012). Course signals at Purdue: Using learning analytics to increase student success. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 267-270).
Arredondo-Soto, K. C., Serrano-Manrrique, J. P., Blanco-Fernandez, J., Hernandez-Escobedo, G., Miranda-Ackerman, M. A., & García-Alcaraz, J. L. (2020). Modeling of the Factors of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) Influencing the Strategic Linking Decisions with the Industrial Sector: Whole-Institution Approach. Sustainability, 12(8), 3089. https://doi.org/10.3390/SU12083089
Askar, M. (2019). Faculty target-based engagement assessment statistical model for enhancing performance and education quality. The International Academic Forum (IAFOR). https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.7.2.02
Batinga, S. M., & Finger, A. (2023). Information management in electronic trading processes in a Federal Institution of Higher Education. RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, 21, e023014. https://doi.org/10.20396/RDBCI.V21I00.8672845
Campos-García, I., & Zúñiga-Vicente, J. Á. (2022). Strategic decision-making in secondary schools: The impact of a principal’s demographic profile. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 21(3), 543-564. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15700763.2020.1802653
Elken, M., Hovdhaugen, E., & Stensaker, B. (2016). Global rankings in the Nordic region: Challenging the identity of research-intensive universities?. Higher Education, 72(6), 781-795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015-9975-6
Evidence Synthesis Hackathon (2020). PRISMA202 R package and ShinyApp for making PRISMA2020 flow diagrams. https://www.eshackathon.org/software/PRISMA2020.html
Fahim, A., Tan, Q., Naz, B., Ain, Q. U., & Bazai, S. U. (2021). Sustainable higher education reform quality assessment using SWOT analysis with integration of AHP and entropy models: A case study of Morocco. Sustainability, 13(8), 4312. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13084312
García, E. M. C. (2021). Management decisions through the neuro management in the universities of zone 3 of Ecuador. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education and Research, 11(3), 88-94. https://doi.org/10.51847/ PhndjOgcbf
Gokak, A. J. H., Mehendale, S., & Bhāle, S. M. (2023). Modelling and analysis for higher education shadow institutions in Indian context: An ISM approach. Quality & Quantity, 57(4), 3425-3451. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11135-022-01514-6
Gürkut, C., Elçi, A., & Nat, M. (2023). An enriched decision-making satisfaction model for student information management systems. International Journal of Information Management Data Insights, 3(2), 100195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjimei.2023.100195
Keikha, A., Hoveida, R., & Yaghoubi, N. M. (2017). The development of an intelligent leadership model for state universities. Форсайт, 11(1), 66-74. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2017.1.66.74
Kuang, Y., & Li, Z. (2022). Personal Value Orientation, Expectation Confirmation and Choice Behavior: A Perspective of Sustainable Higher Vocational Development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & Planning, 17(7), 2263-2270. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.170727
Labib, A., Read, M., Gladstone-Millar, C., Tonge, R., & Smith, D. (2014). Formulation of higher education institutional strategy using operational research approaches. Studies in Higher Education, 39(5), 885-904. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2012.754868
Maini, E., De Rosa, M., & Vecchio, Y. (2021). The role of education in the transition towards sustainable agriculture: A family farm learning perspective. Sustainability, 13(14), 8099. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148099
Makki, A. A., & Al-Filali, I. Y. (2024). Modeling the strategic enablers of financial sustainability in Saudi higher education institutions using an integrated decision-making trial and Evaluation Laboratory–Interpretive Structural Modeling Approach. Sustainability, 16(2), 685. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020685
Mamites, I., Almerino Jr, P., Sitoy, R., Atibing, N. M., Almerino, J. G., Cebe, D., ... & Ocampo, L. (2022). Factors influencing teaching quality in universities: analyzing causal relationships based on neutrosophic DEMATEL. Education Research International, 1, 9475254. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9475254
Molavi, H. (2024). Exploring stakeholder perceptions and policy implications for strategic managment of large‐size classes: A systematic literature review. Review of Education, 12(2), e3481. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3481
Ngwenya, V. C., & Phuthi, N. (2022). Academic leadership and decision-making in institutions of higher learning in Zimbabwe: Trends and tribulations. SA Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 11. https://doi.org/ 10.4102/sajhrm.v20i0.1982
Odlin, D., Benson-Rea, M., & Sullivan-Taylor, B. (2022). Student internships and work placements: approaches to risk management in higher education. Higher Education, 83(6), 1409-1429. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-11-2021-0956
Okoye, K., Arrona-Palacios, A., Camacho-Zuñiga, C., Hammout, N., Nakamura, E. L., Escamilla, J., & Hosseini, S. (2020). Impact of students evaluation of teaching: A text analysis of the teachers qualities by gender. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00224-z
Øvrelid, E. (2022). Exploring the Alignment between Digital Strategies and Educational Practices in Higher Education Infrastructures. Education Sciences, 12(10), 711. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100711
Pacheco-Velazquez, E., Rodes-Paragarino, V., & Marquez-Uribe, A. (2024). Exploring educational simulation platform features for addressing complexity in Industry 4.0: A qualitative analysis of insights from logistics experts. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 9, p. 1331911). Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/ feduc.2024.1331911
Ren, Q., & Wareewanich, T. (2023). Research on performance evaluation of higher vocational education informatization based on data envelopment analysis. STEM Education, 3(3), 230-250. https://doi.org/ 10.3934/steme.2023014
Sachmpazidi, D., Olmstead, A., Thompson, A. N., Henderson, C., & Beach, A. (2021). Team-based instructional change in undergraduate STEM: characterizing effective faculty collaboration. International Journal of STEM Education, 8, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00273-4
Shen, B., & Zhang, S. (2022). Determinants of workplace choice: how important is the city’s ecological environment in attracting jobseekers in china. Sustainability, 14(5), 2624. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14052624
Siemens, G., & Long, P. (2011). Penetrating the Fog: Analytics in Learning and Education. EDUCAUSE Review, 46(5), 30.
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .
