Xu hướng ứng dụng công nghệ thông tin và truyền thông trong nghiên cứu khoa học: một phân tích tổng quan trong bối cảnh chuyển đổi số

Các tác giả

  • Ngô Văn Định Trường Văn hóa, Cục Đào tạo - Bộ Công an
  • Trịnh Thị Phương Thảo Trường Đại học Sư phạm - Đại học Thái Nguyên
  • Nguyễn Thị Thu Hằng Trường Đại học Nông lâm - Đại học Thái Nguyên
  • Nguyễn Trường Giang Trường Đại học Sư phạm - Đại học Thái Nguyên

Tóm tắt

Nowadays, ICT is applied in most of the research activities of scientists. This article presents an overview of the application of information and communication technology (ICT) in scientific research worldwide. Using a systematic review approach, the study selected documents related to the research topic from the online scientific databases Scopus, Science Direct, Springer Nature, SAGE Publications. The content analysis results show that ICT is applied in most activities of the research process. Scholars have studied this application activity in many different directions, such as research on the role, meaning and impact of ICT in scientific research; analysing the current situation of using ICT in research on many different subjects; using online library databases to collect materials; various aspects of online surveys; use software tools to analyze qualitative and quantitative data; the use of the Internet in research; the ability to use social networks to recruit research participants; using social media as a research tool; research on academic social networking in academic communication of scholars; application of ICT tools in writing research reports, automatic citation of references and research collaboration... Some typical authors on the research direction of ICT application in scientific research with many publications in this field are Nader Ale Ebrahim, Guillén-Gámez and Markauskaite. The article also points out some research gaps that need to be filled in the near future.

Tài liệu tham khảo

Ahmad, N., & Fatima, N. (2009). Usage of ICT Products and Services for Research in Social Sciences at Aligarh Muslim University. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 29(2), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.14429/djlit.29.238

Ankamah, S., Akussah, H., & Adams, M. (2019). Postgraduate students’ perception towards the use of ICT in research in Ghanaian public universities. In Library Philosophy and Practice (Vol. 2019). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilp rac/1737

Bala, R., & Rani, R. (2018). Role of ICT in research. International Conference on Recent Researches and Innovations in Sciences, Management, Education and Technology (ICRRISMET-18), 361-365.

Benson, A. O., & Amina. A. B. (2005). The Impact of ICT (Internet) on Research and Studies: The Experience of Delta State University Students in Abraka, Nigeria. Library Hi Tech News, 22(10), 17-21. https://doi.org/10.1108/07419050510644347

Bhuyan, D. J., & Borthakur, P. P. (2019). Effects of information and communication technology in social science research: Probability and usefulness. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(8), 2724-2730.

Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2021). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(6), 641-654. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550

Casler, K., Bickel, L., & Hackett, E. (2013). Separate but equal? A comparison of participants and data gathered via Amazon’s MTurk, social media, and face-to-face behavioral testing. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(6), 2156-2160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009

Coomber, R. (1997). Using the Internet for Survey Research. Sociological Research Online, 2(2), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.73

Dawson, S. (2008). A study of the relationship between student social networks and sense of community. Educational Technology and Society, 11(3), 224-238.

Ebrahim, N. A. (2018). Collecting , Writing , and Publishing via “Research Tools.” 12. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7471988.v1

Ebrahim, N. A. (2019). Introduction to “Research Tools”: Tools for Collecting , Writing, Publishing, and Improving Research Visibility. https://works.bepress.com/aleebrahim/244/

Ebrahim, N. A., Salehi, H., Amin Embi, M., Habibi Tanha, F., Gholizadeh, H., Motahar, S. M., & Ordi, A. (2013). Effective Strategies for Increasing Citation Frequency. International Education Studies, 6(11), 93-99. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n11p93

Eynon, R. (2013). The rise of Big Data: what does it mean for education, technology, and media research? Learning, Media and Technology, 38(3), 237-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2013.771783

Gilbert, L. S., Jackson, K., & di Gregorio, S. (2014). Tools for Analyzing Qualitative Data: The History and Relevance of Qualitative Data Analysis Software. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 221-236). Springer New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_18

Guillén-Gámez, F. D., & Mayorga-Fernández, M. J. (2020a). Design and validation of an instrument of self-perception regarding the lecturers’ use of ICT resources: To teach, evaluate and research. Education and Information Technologies, 26(2), 1627-1646. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-020-10321-1

Guillén-Gámez, F. D., & Mayorga-Fernández, M. J. (2020b). Identification of variables that predict teachers’ attitudes toward ict in higher education for teaching and research: A study with regression. Sustainability, 12(4), 1-14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041312

Guillén-Gámez, F. D., Ruiz-Palmero, J., Sánchez-Rivas, E., & Colomo-Magaña, E. (2020). ICT resources for research: An ANOVA analysis on the digital research skills of higher education teachers comparing the areas of knowledge within each gender. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 4575-4589. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10176-6

Harley, D., Acord, S. K., Earl-Novell, S., Lawrence, S., & King, C. J. (2010). Assessing the future landscape of scholarly communication: An exploration of faculty values and needs in seven disciplines.

Hey, T. (2012). The Fourth Paradigm - Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Microsoft Research, Redmond: Washington. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33299-9_1

Huamani-Navarro, M., Alegria-Delgado, D., López-Sánchez, M., Tarqui-Mamani, C. B., & Ormeño-Caisafana, L. (2011). Know-how, practicals and skills concerning bibliographical searches and students’ perception of university training in research, in the case of students of obstetrics. Educacion Medica, 25, 235-240.

Illingworth, N. (2001). The Internet Matters: Exploring the Use of the Internet as a Research Tool. Sociological Research, 6(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.600

Knezek, G. A., & Christensen, R. (2014). Tools for analyzing quantitative data. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 203-220). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_17

Kosinski, M., Matz, S. C., Gosling, S. D., & Stillwell, V. P. and D. (2015). Facebook as a Research Tool in the Social and Computer Sciences. American Psychologist, 70(6), 543-556. https://doi.org/10.1037/a00392105/9781473983847.n37

Kramer, B., & Bosman, J. (2016). Innovations in scholarly communication - global survey on research tool usage. F1000Research, 5, 692. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.8414.1

Kunda, D., Chembe, C., & Mukupa, G. (2018). Factors that influence Zambian higher education lecturer’s attitude towards integrating ICTs in teaching and research. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8(4), 360. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.338

MacDonald Morah, E. I. (2017). Social media as a research tool for the social and behavioural sciences: Opportunities and methodological challenges. In B. A. P. Lawlor K. (Ed.), Proceedings of the European Conference on Research Methods in Business and Management Studies (pp. 242-249). Academic Conferences Limited.

MacMillan, D. (2012). Mendeley: Teaching scholarly communication and collaboration through social networking. Library Management, 33(8), 561-569. https://doi.org/10.1108/01435121211279902

Mann, C., & Stewart, F. (2000). Internet communication and qualitative research: A handbook for researching online. Sage.

Markauskaite, L. (2010). Digital media, technologies and scholarship: Some shapes of eResearch in educational inquiry. The Australian Educational Researcher, 37(4), 79-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03216938

Markauskaite, L., & Reimann, P. (2014). Editorial: e-Research for education: Applied, methodological and critical perspectives. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 385-391. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12154

Markauskaite, L., & Wardak, D. (2015). Research students’ conceptions of the role of information and communication technologies in educational technology research. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 421-438. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1419

Marmat, G. (2013). Role of ICT in Sustainability of Research: A Conceptual Framework. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 2(4), 548-550.

Mason, S. (2020). Adoption and usage of Academic Social Networks: A Japan case study. Scientometrics, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03345-4

Míguez-González, M. I., Puentes-Rivera, I., & Dafonte-Gómez, A. (2017). Academic social networks and communication researchers from universities in the north of Portugal: An analysis of Academia.edu and ResearchGate. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, 503, 405-411. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46068-0_53

Miller, D., & Slater, D. (2020). The Internet: an ethnographic approach. Routledge.

Mobo, F. (2017). Information Technology Research. American Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 05(02), 100004. https://doi.org/10.21767/2349-3917.100004

Naibei, P. (2015). Role of ICT, ethical issues and challenges facing social science research. ICT And Social Science Research, 1-8.

Nguyen-trung, K., Saeri, A. K., & Kaufman, S. (2023). Applying ChatGPT and AI-powered tools to accelerate evidence reviews. OSF Preprints, 20, 1-30. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/pcrqf

Nguyễn Thị Mỹ Lộc, Trần Trung, Nguyễn Tiến Trung (2020). Công bố khoa học giáo dục theo hướng tiếp cận quốc tế. NXB Giáo dục Việt Nam.

Rife, S. C., Cate, K. L., Kosinski, M., & Stillwell, D. (2016). Participant recruitment and data collection through Facebook: the role of personality factors. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(1), 69-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2014.957069

Roberts, K. A., & Wilson, R. W. (2002). ICT and the research process: Issues around the compatibility of technology with qualitative data analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 3(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-3.2.862

Sarkar, S. (2012). The Role of Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs) in Higher Education. The Science Probe, 1(1), 30-40.

Sim, K. N., & Stein, S. (2016). Reaching the unreached: de-mystifying the role of ICT in the process of doctoral research. Research in Learning Technology, 24(1), 30717. https://doi.org/10.3402/rlt.v24.30717

Singh, V., & Mayer, P. (2014). Scientific writing: Strategies and tools for students and advisors. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 42(5), 405-413. https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20815

Snee, H. (2008). Web 2.0 as a Social Science Research Tool. ESRC Government Placement Scheme The British Library, 1-47.

Stephen, G., & Thanuskodi, S. (2014). Use of ICT by Research Scholars: A Survey of Alagappa University, Karaikudi, Tamilnadu. International Journal of Library and Information Studies, 4(1), 75-84.

Strutynska, O., & Umryk, M. (2017). Ict Tools and Trends in Research, Education and Science: Local Survey. Open Educational E-Environment of Modern University, 3(3), 150-160. https://doi.org/10.28925/2414-0325.2017.3.15016

Sugimoto, C. R., Work, S., Larivière, V., & Haustein, S. (2017). Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(9), 2037-2062. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23833

Tang, J., & Zhang, J. (2008). ArnetMiner: Extraction and Mining of Academic Social Networks. Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 990-998.

Trần Trung, Nguyễn Chí Thành, Ngô Văn Định. (2020). Khai thác phần mềm Mendeley trong phát triển một số kĩ năng nghiên cứu khoa học cho sinh viên sư phạm. Tạp chí Giáo dục, 489, 9-13.

Van Noorden, R. (2014). Online collaboration: Scientists and the social network. Nature, 512(7513), 126-129. https://doi.org/10.1038/512126a

Vehora, V., & Manfreda Lozar, K. (2017). Overview: Online Surveys. In N. G. Fielding, R. M. Lee, & G. Blank (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods (2nd, pp. 143-161). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Wu, M. M., & Lee, L. A. (2012). An Empirical Study on the Research and Critical Evaluation Skills of Law Students. Legal Reference Services Quarterly, 31(3-4), 205-238. https://doi.org/10.1080/0270319X.2012.723571

Zaugg, H., West, R. E., Tateishi, I., & Randall, D. L. (2011). Mendeley: Creating communities of scholarly inquiry through research collaboration. TechTrends, 55(1), 32-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-011-0467-y

Đã Xuất bản


Cách trích dẫn

Ngô , V. Định, Trịnh , T. P. T., Nguyễn , T. T. H., & Nguyễn , T. G. (2024). Xu hướng ứng dụng công nghệ thông tin và truyền thông trong nghiên cứu khoa học: một phân tích tổng quan trong bối cảnh chuyển đổi số. Tạp Chí Giáo dục, 23(đặc biệt 9), 325–332. Truy vấn từ https://tcgd.tapchigiaoduc.edu.vn/index.php/tapchi/article/view/1238


Chuyên mục

Các bài báo

Các bài báo được đọc nhiều nhất của cùng tác giả

1 2 > >>