Khai thác công cụ Research Rabbit trong nghiên cứu khoa học giáo dục
Tóm tắt
In the digital era, searching for and managing research documents has become a challenge for scientists. Research support tools like Research Rabbit are increasingly emphasized due to their ability to optimize the processes of searching, discovering, and organizing documents in a visual and efficient manner. This paper employs the document analysis method, in which the author synthesizes, evaluates, and provides guidance on utilizing Research Rabbit in educational scientific research. The research results show that Research Rabbit enhances research productivity through its user-friendly interface, quick document connectivity, and support for discovering new ideas. However, the tool has limitations regarding language support and database coverage. Important considerations include optimizing search keywords, systematically managing document libraries, and verifying the reliability of sources. Expanding the database and improving language integration are necessary to better suit diverse research needs. Users are recommended to combine Research Rabbit with other tools such as Zotero or Mendeley for more effective citation management.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Clark, K. R. (2022). Education for sustainable development, curriculum reform and implications for teacher education in a small island developing state. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 13(1), 145-153.
Cole, V., & Boutet, M. (2023). ResearchRabbit. The Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association, 44(2), 43-47.
Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Cucari, N., Tutore, I., Montera, R., & Profita, S. (2023). A bibliometric performance analysis of publication productivity in the corporate social responsibility field: Outcomes of SciVal analytics. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 30(1), 1-16.
del Carmen Pegalajar-Palomino, M., Burgos-García, A., & Martinez-Valdivia, E. (2021). What does education for sustainable development offer in initial teacher training? A systematic review. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 23(1), 99-114.
Dresbeck, R. (2015). SciVal. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 103(3), 164.
Fischer, D., King, J., Rieckmann, M., Barth, M., Büssing, A., Hemmer, I., & Lindau-Bank, D. (2022). Teacher education for sustainable development: A review of an emerging research field. Journal of Teacher Education, 73(5), 509-524.
Grosseck, G., Țîru, L. G., & Bran, R. A. (2019). Education for sustainable development: Evolution and perspectives: A bibliometric review of research, 1992-2018. Sustainability, 11(21), 6136.
Hallinger, P., & Nguyen, V. T. (2020). Mapping the landscape and structure of research on education for sustainable development: A bibliometric review. Sustainability, 12(5), 1947.
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education: Promises and Implications for Teaching and Learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
Imara, K., & Altinay, F. (2021). Integrating education for sustainable development competencies in teacher education. Sustainability, 13(22), 12555.
Jekabsone, I., & Gudele, I. (2023). Online adult education for sustainable development: the analysis of the consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic in latvia. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 25(1), 155167.
Mokski, E., Leal Filho, W., Sehnem, S., & Andrade Guerra, J. B. S. O. D. (2023). Education for sustainable development in higher education institutions: an approach for effective interdisciplinarity. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 24(1), 96-117.
O’Flaherty, J., & Liddy, M. (2017). The impact of development education and education for sustainable development interventions: a synthesis of the research. Environmental Education Research, 24(7), 1031-1049. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1392484
Phan Văn Kha (2021). Khoa học giáo dục với sự nghiệp đổi mới căn bản và toàn diện nền giáo dục Việt Nam. Tạp chí Khoa học Giáo dục Việt Nam, số đặc biệt tháng 12, 1-9.
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed.). Pearson.
Siraj-Blatchford, J., Smith, K. C., & Samuelsson, I. P. (2010). Education for sustainable development in the early years. Buenos Aires, Argentina: OMEP, World Organization for Early Childhood Education.
Thao, P. T. T., Hiep, P. H., Hai, L. D., Tung, N. T. T., Doan, P., Vu, H. M., … Van Anh, N. T. (2023). 55 năm Khoa học Giáo dục Việt Nam. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/syg7p
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép

Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .