Các yếu tố ảnh hưởng đến hoạt động phục vụ cộng đồng của giảng viên trường đại học
Tóm tắt
Given higher education’s increasingly essential role in community service, this paper presents factors influencing faculty participation in these activities. Through an analysis of relevant literature and theories, the study identifies four main groups of factors: organizational factors (policies, structures, leadership, and organizational culture) with direct influence on the level of commitment and participation; personal motivation (need for self-actualization, desire for recognition and promotion opportunities) which promotes active participation; faculty perceptions (understanding and views on the importance of community service) determining the level of commitment; and workload (pressure from teaching, research and other duties), which limits the time and energy available for these activities. Based on the findings, the paper proposes a comprehensive model, providing a scientific foundation for developing policies and strategies to encourage faculty participation, thereby improving the quality of education and strengthening the role of universities in societal development.
Tài liệu tham khảo
Akbar, Z., Tahir, S. Z. B., Chamidah, D., & Siregar, R. (2021). The effect of workload on performance through time management and work stress of educators. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (pp. 1-6). São Paulo, Brazil.
Beere, C. A., Votruba, J. C., & Wells, G. W. (2011). Becoming an engaged campus: A practical guide for institutionalizing public engagement. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bergquist, W. H., & Pawlak, K. (2008). Engaging the six cultures of the academy: Revised and expanded edition of the four cultures of the academy. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Bộ GD-ĐT (2020). Thông tư số 20/2020/TT-BGDĐT ngày 27/7/2020 quy định chế độ làm việc của giảng viên cơ sở giáo dục đại học.
Boyer, E. L. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. Princeton, NJ: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
Boyer, E. L. (1996). The scholarship of engagement. Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 49(7), 18-33.
Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (2002). Campus-community partnerships: The terms of engagement. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), 503-516.
Escrigas, C., Sánchez, J. G., Hall, B., & Tandon, R. (2014). Introduction: Knowledge and higher education contributing to social change. Global University Network for Innovation, 5, 1-9.
K. (2019). Institutionalizing community engagement in higher education: A case study of processes toward engagement. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 23(2), 147-152.
Glassick, C. E., Huber, M. T., & Maeroff, G. I. (1997). Scholarship assessed: Evaluation of the professoriate. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Hinck, S. S., & Brandell, M. E. (2000). The relationship between institutional support and campus acceptance of academic service learning. American Behavioral Scientist, 43(5), 868-881.
Holland, B. A. (1999). Factors and strategies that influence faculty involvement in public service. Journal of Public Service and Outreach, 4(1), 37-43.
Horowitz, C. R., Robinson, M., & Seifer, S. (2009). Community-based participatory research from the margin to the mainstream: Are researchers prepared? Circulation, 119(19), 2633-2642.
Inman, P., & Schütze, H. G. (2010). The community engagement and service mission of universities. Leicester, UK: NIACE.
Kouritzin, S. (2019). Extent and consequences of faculty members’ workload creep in three Canadian faculties of education. Journal of Higher Education, 73(4), 582-602.
Langseth, M. N., & Plater, W. M. (2004). Public work and the academy: An academic administrator's guide to civic engagement and service-learning. Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370-396.
McCollough, C. J. (2020). Cultivating a civic mindset: Assessing public relations student perceptions of service learning and community involvement beyond the course. Journal of Community Engagement and Higher Education, 12(2), 6-16.
Molas-Gallart, J., Salter, A., Patel, P., Scott, A., Duran, X., & Patel, A. (2012). Measuring third stream activities. Final Report to the Higher Education Funding Council for England.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
O’Meara, K. A. (2002). Scholarship unbound: Assessing service as scholarship for promotion and tenure. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
O’Meara, K. A. (2003). Reframing incentives and rewards for community service-learning and academic outreach. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 8(2), 201-220.
O’Meara, K. A. (2008). Motivation for public scholarship and engagement: Listening to exemplars. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 12(1), 7-29.
O’Meara, K. A., Sandmann, L. R., Saltmarsh, J., & Giles, D. E. (2011). Studying the professional lives and work of faculty involved in community engagement. Innovative Higher Education, 36, 83-96.
Quốc hội (2018). Luật sửa đổi, bổ sung một số điều của Luật Giáo dục đại học. Luật số 34/2018/QH14, ban hành ngày 19/11/2018.
Saltmarsh, J., Hartley, M., & Clayton, P. H. (2009). Democratic engagement white paper. Boston, MA: New England Resource Center for Higher Education.
Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Vogelgesang, L., Denson, N., & Jayakumar, U. (2005). Does institutional support for engaged scholarship matter? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Study of Higher Education, Philadelphia, PA.
Ward, K. (2003). Faculty service roles and the scholarship of engagement. In ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 29(5). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Tải xuống
Đã Xuất bản
Cách trích dẫn
Số
Chuyên mục
Giấy phép
Tác phẩm này được cấp phép theo Ghi nhận tác giả của Creative Commons Giấy phép quốc tế 4.0 .
